Using Designed Experiments for Cake Mix
.docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Lawrence Technological University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
6753
Subject
Industrial Engineering
Date
Dec 6, 2023
Type
docx
Pages
11
Uploaded by BrigadierClover826
Using Designed Experiments (DOE) to Minimize
Moisture Loss
Marilyn Wheatley
20 February, 2017
11
11 Comments
As a person who loves baking (and eating) cakes, I find it bothersome to go through all the effort of
baking a cake when the end result is too dry for my taste. For that reason, I decided to use a
designed experiment in Minitab to help me reduce the moisture loss in baked chocolate cakes, and
find the optimal settings of my input factors to produce a moist baked chocolate cake. I’ll share the
details of the design and the results in this post.
Choosing Input Factors for the Designed
Experiment
Because I like to use premixed chocolate cake mixes, I decided to use two of my favorite cake mix
brands for the experiment. For the purpose of this post, I’ll call the brands A and B. Thinking about
what could impact the loss of moisture, it is likely that the baking time and the oven temperature will
affect the results. Therefore, the factors or inputs that I decided to use for the experiment are:
1.
Cake mix brand: A or B (categorical data)
2.
Oven temperature: 350 or 380 degrees Fahrenheit (continuous data)
3.
Baking time: 38 or 46 minutes (continuous data)
Measuring the Response
Next, I needed a way to measure the moisture loss. For this experiment, I used an electronic food
scale to weigh each cake (in the same baking pan) before and after baking, and then used those
weights in conjunction with the formula below to calculate the percent of moisture lost for each cake:
% Moisture Loss = 100 x initial weight – final weight
initial weight
Designing the Experiment
For this experiment, I decided to construct a 2
3
full factorial design with
center points
to detect any
possible curvature in the response surface. Since the cake mix brand is categorical and therefore
has no center point between brand A and brand B, the number of center points will be doubled for
that factor. Because of this, I’d have to bake 10 cakes which, even for me, is too many in a single
day. Therefore, I decided to run the experiment over two days. Because differences between the
days on which the data was collected could potentially introduce additional variation, I decided to add
a block to the design to account for any potential variation due to the day.
To create my design in Minitab, I use
Stat
>
DOE
>
Factorial
>
Create Factorial Design
:
Minitab makes it easy to enter the details of the design. First, I selected 3 as the number of factors:
Next, I clicked on the
Designs
button above. In the Designs window, I can tell Minitab what type of
design I’d like to use with my 3 factors:
In the window above, I’ve selected a full 2
3
design, and also added 2 blocks (to account for variation
between days), and 1 center point per block. After making the selections and clicking
OK
in the
above window, I clicked on the
Factors
button in the main window to enter the details about each of
my factors:
Because center points are doubled for categorical factors, and because this design has two blocks,
the final design will have a total of 4 center points. After clicking
OK
in the window above, I ended
up with the design shown below with 12 runs:
Performing the Experiment and Analyzing the
Data
After spending an entire weekend baking cakes and calculating the moisture loss for each one, I
entered the data into Minitab for the analysis. I also brought in a lot of cake to share with my
colleagues at Minitab!
With the moisture loss for each of my 12 cakes recorded in column C8 in the experiment worksheet,
I’m ready to analyze the results.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help