Lab 5 and 6
.pdf
keyboard_arrow_up
School
University of Illinois, Urbana Champaign *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
300
Subject
Industrial Engineering
Date
Apr 3, 2024
Type
Pages
12
Uploaded by Tega777
CEE 300/TAM 324: Lab 5&6 Impact testing and Fracture toughness Lab section: Student name: General note: Use space as needed. The answer length is not suggested by the space. All equation numbers listed are from the respective lab in the lab manual. Q1. (6 pts) Complete Table 1. Impact testing Plate penetration Table 1—Plate-penetration data (Polymers)
Measurement or property
Material
Name
Symbol
Units
PMMA
ABS
Specimen dimensions and impact parameters
Specimen shape
—
—
Plate
Plate
Clamp diameter
2
a
mm
76
76
Specimen thickness
h
mm
2.89
3.08
Crosshead height
H
m
760
930
Crosshead weight
W
N
61.8
61.8
Avail. energy (theor.)
WH
J
46968
57474
Measurements of time to failure, maximum load, and energy absorbed
Environment
Tim
e t
fail (mse
c)
Max
. load
P (kN)
Total energ
y
Γ
(J)
Tim
e t
fail (mse
c)
Max
. load
P (kN)
Total energ
y
Γ
(J)
Freezing water (0 °C)
Impact data
1.6
0.532
1.56
5.78
1.16
14.3
Description of fracture surface
Cracks on fracture surface, completely shattered
Cracks on fracture surface, Room temperature ( °C)
Impact data
2.9
0.640
3.91
5.44
1.12
12.9
Description of fracture surface
Cracks on fracture surface
Cracks on fracture surface
Boiling water (100 °C)
Impact data
8.88
3.03
43.7
7.52
2.15
34.1
Description of fracture surface
Plastic deformation before failure
Plastic deformation before failure
Q2. (9 pts) For each polymer tested, plot the values of maximum load and total absorbed energy as functions of test temperature. Then extrapolate the plot to -50 and 150 ºC and show the probable dependence of maximum load and total absorbed energy on temperature. The extrapolation should reflect the observed changes in energy and the expected glass transition behavior of the material. Keep in mind that the minimum value of energy that can be absorbed is zero, and the maximum value is the initial potential energy WH of the impactor, which can be calculated from the data in the header file. When extrapolating to -50 and 150 ºC, the energy should be within these bounds. PMMA: Figure 1. Maximum Load vs Temperature (Plate Penetration): PMMA Figure 2. Total Absorbed Energy vs Temperature (Plate Penetration): PMMA
ABS: Figure 3. Maximum Load vs Temperature (Plate Penetration): ABS Figure 4. Total Absorbed Energy vs Temperature (Plate Penetration): ABS
Charpy impact Q3. (6 pts) Complete Table 2. Table 2—Charpy impact data
Measurement or property
Material
Name
Symbol
Units
1045 HR Steel
6061 Aluminum
Specimen dimensions and impact parameters
Anvil Spacing
L
mm
40
40
Depth
D
mm
9.37
9.44
Width
w
mm
7.62
8.39
Notch depth
d
mm
7.06
7.06
Notch root radius
r
mm
0.095
0.095
Crosshead height
H
m
738
758
Crosshead weight
W
N
125
125.2
Avail. energy (theor.)
WH
J
92250
94901.6
Measurements of maximum load and energy absorbed
Temperature
T
Max. load
(kN)
Energy
(J)
Max. load
(kN)
Energy
(J)
Freezing water (0 °C)
Impact data
12.1
5.12
7.10
13.5
Description of fracture surface
Shear lip at fracture surface
Shear lip at fracture surface
Room temperature ( °C)
Impact data
16.7
8.41
6.78
12.6
Description of fracture surface
Shear lip at fracture surface
Boiling water (100 °C)
Impact data
13.1
23.4
6.79
11.2
Description of fracture surface
Shear lip at fracture surface
Shear lip at fracture surface
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help