Solutions Sample Final Exam 8AM (1)
.xlsx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
New York University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
103
Subject
Industrial Engineering
Date
Jan 9, 2024
Type
xlsx
Pages
13
Uploaded by BailiffNewtMaster1012
Problem 1. (42 points) A dataset contains 93 observations (93 cars) of City Fuel Efficiency (y) vs Hi
xbar = 29.183
r_xy
0.94045
SST
2897.172
SSE
334.7799
R^2
0.884446
SSR
2562.392
MSE
3.6789
alpha =.05
H0: Beta1 =0
HA: Beta1 neq 0
RR: |Z| > 1.96 since we have 91 df
test stat: t = b1/sb1
Since |26.39148| > 1.96, at alpha =.05, we have evidence that Beta1 neq 0.
.9867 +/- 1.645*(.037387)
We are 90% confident Beta1 is in the above calculated interval. This is because if we w
intervals would include Beta1. Beta1 is the slope of the true regression City Fuel Eff = we expect coty fuel eff to change by Beta1 units.
xbar
29.183
29.183 +/- 1.645*(5.3486/sqrt(93))
s_x
5.348645
93
S
2
x
= 28.608
S
2
y
= 31.491
b
0
= -6.32 b
1
= .9867
A.
Find r
x,y
, R
2
, s
b1
, s
e
, SSR, SSE, SST, MSE. (16 points)
B.
Is there evidence that Beta1 is not equal to 0? Use alpha =.05. (8 points)
C.
Construct a 90% CI for Beta1 and interpret it within the context of this problem. (9
D.
Construct a 90% CI for mu
x
, the true population mean of the x values (Highway M
ighway Fuel Efficiency (x). s_e
1.918046
sb1
0.037387
SS_xx
2631.936
tc
26.39148
were to repeat the process many times, approx 90% of the resulting
Beta0 + Beta1*Hwy eff + epsilon. As Hwy eff increases by 1 unit
9 points)
MPG). (9 points)
Problem 2. (20 points)
Consider the following regression of Household rating (a rating that measures the popularity of tv sh
Coefficients
Term
Coef
SE Coef
T-Value
P-Value
VIF
Constant
4.096
0.397
10.32
0
1.453
0.539
2.7
0.008
1.37
0.759
0.561
1.35
0.18
1.37
Model Summary
S
R-sq
2.24578
6.84%
4.96%
1.13%
Analysis of Variance
Source
DF
Adj SS
Adj MS
F-Value
P-Value
Regression
2
36.679
18.34
3.64
0.03
Error
99
499.311
5.044
Total
101
535.99
alpha = .025
H0: Beta1 = Beta2 =0
HA: At least one such Beta neq 0
test stat: F = MSR/MSE and its p-value is .03. Since .03 is not less than .025, at alpha =.025, we do not have sufficient evidence that T
4.096 +/- 1.645*.397
We are 90% confident that Beta0 is the above interval. This is because if we were to repeat the pr
would include Beta0. Beta0 is the true mean Household rating for Comedy shows.
estimate for Drama
5.549
estimate for Reality
4.855
Estimate for difference in avg rating between Drama and Reality
0.694
Type_Dra
ma
Type_Reali
ty/
Participatio
n
R-
sq(adj)
R-
sq(pred)
A.
Is there evidence that Type is an important predictor Household Rating? Use alpha
B.
Construct a 90% CI for the average Household Rating for Comedy shows and inter
C.
Provide an estimate for the difference in average rating between Drama and Reality
hows by household) versus Show Type (Comedy, Drama, or Reality/Participation).
Type is an important predictor of Household Rating.
rocess many times, approx 90% of the resulting intervals a =.025. Explain your answer. (8 points) rpret the CI? (8 points)
y shows. (4 points)
Problem 3. (24 points)
Consider the following regression of Household rating (a rating that measures the popularity of tv shows
Coefficients
Term
Coef
SE Coef
T-Value
P-Value
VIF
Constant
4.008
0.409
9.8
0
1.229
0.441
2.79
0.006
1.38
1.283
0.464
2.76
0.007
1.41
1.893
0.461
4.11
0
1.31
-1.464
0.433
-3.38
0.001
1.31
Model Summary
S
R-sq R-sq(adj)
1.83362
39.15%
36.64%
32.68%
Analysis of Variance
Source
DF
Adj SS
Adj MS
F-Value
P-Value
Regression
4 209.840085 52.46002125 15.60209532
0
Error
97
326.149915 3.362370258
Total
101
535.99
alpha =.01
H0: Beta1=Beta2=Beta3=Beta4=0
HA: At least one such Beta neq 0
test stat: F = MSR/MSE
p-value is 0. Since 0 < .01, at alpha = .01, we have evidence that at least one such Be
for describing Household Rating.
-1.464 +/- 1.96*.433. We are 95% confident that Beta4 is in the above calculated interval. This is because if Beta4 is the expected difference in Household rating for NBC network and ABC Networ
The above calculated interval has both endpoints negative, thus, there is evidence tha
This model is the complete one and Prob 2 model is the reduced one.
Type_Dra
ma
Type_Reali
ty/
Participatio
n
Network_C
BS
Network_N
BC
R-
sq(pred)
A.
Is there evidence of model utility for describing/explaining Household Rating? Use alp
B.
Construct a 95% CI for the coefficient in front of NBC and interpret it in the context of
C.
Compare this regression model to the one from problem 2. Use alpha = .05. (7 points
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help