OSH 2301 Unit VIII Final Exam

.docx

School

Columbia Southern University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

2301

Subject

Mechanical Engineering

Date

Dec 6, 2023

Type

docx

Pages

2

Uploaded by ChancellorOstrich1673

Report
The core elements of a safety management system are first to have a clear and understandable written plan. This includes policies, procedures, and written processes that include all at risk tasks to be conducted in the normal and emergency scope of a job. The system must include comprehensive training from start of employment and continuing, refresher training periodically thereafter. The program must be monitored for effectiveness and modified when gaps are discovered, and changes are needed. Though the program needs to be supported from all levels it is imperative that supervision enforce and coach their subordinates in safe techniques and mitigation methods. A good program will have a robust reporting system to capture all incidents including root causes, near miss reporting, and mitigation actions taken that will help the program move forward and help repeating mistakes. The hierarchy of control is a step-by-step approach to eliminating or reducing risks and it ranks risk controls from the highest level of protection and reliability through to the lowest and least reliable protection. It consists of five controls and those are: Elimination, Substitution, Engineering, Administrative, and Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). An example of elimination would be loading hazardous products on a railcar. To eliminate this, you would stop loading the hazardous products on the railcar. An example of substitution would be if a company is using cleaning materials that are toxic you would substitute the cleaning materials for something that is less harmful and more user friendly. An example of engineering control would be installing vent hoods for a process that creates lots of lead. An administrative control is to have policies in place that show how to conduct a task from start to finish. And Personal Protective Equipment or PPE is to ensure that you are wearing what is needed for the task at hand. The three sources of ignition that I see primarily in my workplace are electrical boxes, hot work, and equipment maintenance. We just had an MSHA Inspection last week at our site and the main thing we got cited on was electrical. We had spare spots in the on position and holes not covered with caps on top and bottom of the electrical boxes. The way we can control and eliminate this is when doing the work ensure that it is done correctly. Have a checklist so that you can go step by step and not forget to label the box that was a spare or cover the holes that should have caps. Equipment maintenance is another source of ignition. We tend to run equipment until failure to ensure we get the most bang for our buck. This can cause mechanical issues which could eventually lead to a spark of some sort or even a fire. Equipment should be regularly maintained and inspected for mechanical integrity. Any hazard that is identified in the inspection should be immediately corrected. The third source is hot work. Welding can carry a significant risk because fuel is always looking for an ignition source. A way to control and eliminate these sources is through safe work plans, proper lock out tag out procedures, and tests before and after the process.
Leading indicators are proactive and preventative measures that help measure the effectiveness of a process or program. Lagging indicators measure evets and frequency of occurrence of things that have occurred so that you know where your system or process is failing. While both leading and lagging indicators are good tools in adjusting a safety program or process, leading indicators can reveal potential problems before they occur. Being proactive is always the preferred action regarding safety. Lagging indicators focus on system failures that have occurred which is reactive and can result in injury, illness, or death. When leading indicators such as near misses are reported, the management system will direct those responsible for change to make corrections before an event occurs. When lagging indicators are reviewed many times the loss has occurred, and the system should still react to prevent reoccurrence, but the damage has already been done. Both are still a valuable part of the safety management system. They show trends and provide important data on how to keep something moving in the right direction to adjust or mitigate something from reoccurring. Even without a formal safety program both leading and lagging indicators can shed light on the direction of the company needs to go to prevent, reduce, improve, and increase performance throughout the organization.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help