[HW9] Hypothesis Testing and Regression Analysis

.xlsx

School

Bloomsburg University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

101

Subject

Statistics

Date

Apr 3, 2024

Type

xlsx

Pages

17

Uploaded by PresidentGrouse4378

Report
SUMMARY OUTPUT Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.8973275062 R Square 0.8051966534 Adjusted R Square 0.7917619398 Standard Error 2.2781474488 Observations 32 ANOVA df SS MS F Significance F Regression 2 622.110031848 311.05501592 59.93403952 5.0020496E-11 Residual 29 150.508718152 5.1899557983 Total 31 772.61875 Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95% Intercept -13.365770151 7.65113640121 -1.7468999964 0.0912393677 -29.014101115 Yards/Game 0.1220941466 0.0123093957 9.9187766456 7.938703E-11 0.0969186056 Opponent Yards/Game -0.0142907103 0.01617121466 -0.8837128587 0.3841190458 -0.0473645579 Seeing as our yards/game p-value is lower than our alpha, we can say that our yards/game predictor is a However, our opponent yards/game is not a signifigant estimate as its p-value is far larger than our alph So changes in yard/game are associated with points/game, but changes with opponent yards/game are The intercept coefficient shows us that if yards/game and opponent yards/game are zero, then the pred The yards/game coefficient means that as our yards per game increases by one unit while holding all oth Even though our opponent yards/game is not signifigant, we can still explain it. The opponent yards/gam
Upper 95% Lower 95.0% Upper 95.0% 2.2825608123 -29.014101115 2.2825608123 0.1472696876 0.0969186056 0.1472696876 0.0187831372 -0.0473645579 0.0187831372 a signifigant estimate ha value not associated with points/game dicted points/game is -13.365 her variables constant, our points per game increases by 0.122 me coefficient means that as our oppoenent yards per game increases by one unit while holding all other variab
bles constant, our points per game decreases by 0.014
SUMMARY OUTPUT Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.7563284474 R Square 0.5720327203 Adjusted R Square 0.5577671443 Standard Error 3.3199173918 Observations 32 ANOVA df SS MS F Significance F Regression 1 441.963205342 441.96320534 40.098816955 5.5278694E-07 Residual 30 330.655544658 11.021851489 Total 31 772.61875 Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95% Intercept -0.616076942 3.57169120526 -0.1724888594 0.8642116413 -7.9104435129 Passing Yards/Game 0.1041010312 0.0164395245 6.3323626676 5.527869E-07 0.0705270432 Since as our p-value is less than 1% for our passing yards per game coefficient, we can say that passin Now looking at our intercept, we can say that with 0 passing yards per game, our points per game wil This may seem ridiculuous since it would be impossible to have negative points in a game, but we are Now our passing yards per game coefficient means that if we passing yards per game increases by on With this information, we can say changes in passing yards per game impact our points per game 10 15 20 25 30 35 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Passing Yards/Game vs Points/Game Points/Game Passing Yeards/Game
Upper 95% Lower 95.0% Upper 95.0% 6.6782896289 -7.9104435129 6.6782896289 0.1376750193 0.0705270432 0.1376750193 ng yards is a signifigant estimator for points per game ll be -0.61608 e using linear regression so this is just where our intercept happens to fall and it is almost impossible to have ze ne, the points per game will increase by 0.104101 The graph shows a strong positive relationship between these two variables. In other words, as passing yards per game increases, so does points per game (in general). 5 40
ero passing yards in a game
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help