About 19,500,000 animals in total are killed in scientific research every year. This means that about twenty percent of the animals tested on each year die, which may not seem like a large percentage; however, if it is taken into account that this happens to the same species in an endless cycle, the numbers can begin to build. Although, through this process of testing, many lifesaving medicines have been created for all types of animals including humans. So, the issue the world is experiencing right now is even if animal testing helps many people and animals, is it still ethical to use living creatures to do this. There are currently problems regarding this all around the globe, for example, the European Union recently banned testing …show more content…
In addition, there are clinical trials which are tests run on human volunteers. Some groups that are on the supporting side of animal testing are Understanding Animal Research and Speaking of Research. In Understanding Animal Research, there are people like Wendy Jerrett, the Chief Executive, who has been working in health communications for almost 30 years. One of their main arguments is that “ while non-animal methods play an important part of biomedical research, they cannot replace all use of animals.” This statement does make sense, however, through research I have not found anything that cannot be altered to replace animal testing. Despite this, Speaking of Research brings up a good argument that can support the former one. People in Speaking of Research include Christine Archer, who is a registered veterinary technician. One of their arguments is that “ The success of many animal rights groups’ campaigns depend heavily upon the poor public understanding of animal research, uncountered misrepresentations of scientists and their work, and exploitation of the misconceptions and negative perceptions that many people have of the use of animals in the biomedical and behavioral sciences.” So, by their way of thinking, all the negative opinions about animal experimentation are only because of misunderstandings and the uneducated public. Moving on to the creditability of these organizations, I question
Throughout history, animal experimentation has played an important role in leading to new discoveries and human benefits. However, what many people tend to forget are the millions of animals that are tortured or killed during the process of these painful, deadly experiments. Many people seem to misunderstand animal nature and the laboratory procedures and techniques that are executed on the animals. The procedures are cruel, unreliable, and harmful. Luckily there are more humane alternatives that have also proved to be less expensive.
Animals can be burned, crippled, poisoned, and abused as a result of testing. And the list could go on forever. The way animals are being mistreated and tested on should be against the law. There is a different ways to do research other than killing and abusing animals. There are many alternate test that scientist can use to do there research without harming animals. Alternative test are defined as test that use the three “R’s”, a test that replaces a procedure that uses animals with one that doesn’t, a test that reduces the number of animals used in a procedure, and test that refine a procedure to cause less pain to the animal.(11 Facts about…)
Isolated, "confined in small, bare cages", alone, their "dull and blank" eyes showed the loss of hope. Do these animals deserve this? Do they deserve to be torn away from their families just to be "locked away, innocent of crime, into solitary confinement" and tested on just so we can have all of these new cosmetic products that we already have a sufficient amount of. Do we need more shampoos or do we have enough? I am aware there are tests used to advance in medical research and I believe that this is acceptable but, the tests performed should be effectuated only if it will make progress. However, the tests being done for cosmetic usage are unnecessary, capitalistic, and inhumane.
Imagine, you are in an animal lab and there are scientists all around you. Now these people are not your friends. They put you in cages where you stay. Now they have shots that they give you every day. You never know what is going to happen to you next. You could throw up, get a disease, a horrible rash, and much more.
Is testing products on animals really worth animal abuse? The FDA is testing drugs on animals that can potentially harm them. The FDA keeps these animals locked up in cages so they can see effects of drugs on them. To make sure the drugs are safe for humans. The FDA should test drugs on something other than animals to develop better drugs. The FDA should test drugs on something other than animals because it is less costly, it avoids animal abuse, and the FDA will get more accurate results using updated information. To conclude, drug testing should be done on something other than animals.
When most people go to the store to buy their day-to-day groceries, cosmetics, and other necessities, they do not consider how those items were manufactured. They pick up their perfume, makeup, dish soap, floor cleaner, yet they never stop to contemplate the countless, defenseless animals that perished due to these products. Human don’t want to consider the horrific background behind their cosmetics and cleaning supplies; they don’t want to face the reality of the situation. But for the millions of animals that are being tested on every year, they can’t ignore the reality, because it’s their reality every day.
“The question is not, can they reason? Not, can they talk? But, can they suffer?” - Jeremy Bentham. Testing on animals was never the humane way to test new products or drugs on animals. The fact that there are companies out there that choose to test on animals is disappointing because those companies have options to replace such cruelty. Animal experimentation is not the only option; there is always an option.
Do you think about what happens to the animals in laboratories that are being tested on? Would you want to have an ear on your back or be trapped to a table still alive, but are getting cut into without anesthesia? Would you like to be forcibly killed by carbon dioxide asphyxiation, neck breaking, decapitation and other horrible acts? I know you wouldn’t want to go through pain and suffering so why should the animals have to do it. Which side are you on, the people that says it is animal suffering or the side that says it is experimentation that uses animals to benefit humans?
Antibiotics for infections, chemotherapy for cancer, and insulin for diabetes have been made possible through testing and research performed on animals. Through extensive research and time, scientists have provided people with new diagnostics, treatments, and even cures. The world would be living without these medical advancements if it weren’t for animal testing. Furthermore, animal testing is the most popular and sufficient way for scientists to progress in their research. Human testing is unethical and risky with new treatments and drugs. That’s why it’s important for experimenting to be continued on animals. Animal testing research provides necessary experiments to modify treatments and advancements in healthcare for
It is estimated that 25 million animals are used to conduct product testing for human use. These product testing’s can range from the shampoo we use to our medicine. There are many alternatives to inhumane and cruel tests done on defenseless animals. Banning the testing of products on animals in the U.S. would end the suffering and wrongfulness towards animals.
On the other hand, animal testing has been extremely important and has saved many lives, and continue to do so. “The California Biomedical Research Association states that nearly every medical breakthrough in the last 100 years has resulted directly from research using animals.” (California Biomedical Research Association). The benefits of animal testing far out way the costs. If saving humans from disease and death means that there will be some loss in animal lives, then that is a sacrifice medical research should be willing to
Animal testing is morally wrong. Tests are done on monkeys, guinea pigs, mice, rabbits, cats, dogs, and many other animals. These animals are exposed to chemicals and are sometimes purposefully injured to observe recovery (if there is any). “9 out of 10 candidates that appear safe and effective in animal studies fail when given to humans”(About Animal Testing). These animals are put through terrible tests and awful living conditions, and despite the efforts, some are inaccurate. Scientists still conduct experiments partially because they get better pay that way (Starer). Using animals lives for human benefit and profit is cruel and cold-hearted.
Animal Research is another name for animal testing, where an estimated twenty-six (26) million animals are being tested on for medical, commercial, and biomedical purposes. Many people stand behind the use of animals, as it furthers scientific research. “The California Biomedical Research Association states that nearly every medical breakthrough in the last 100 years has resulted directly from research using animals” (). They increase functionality as certain animals, such as chimpanzees who share 99% of their DNA with humans, are genetically similar to humans (); making it “acceptable” to test on animals, as researching on humans is unethical. Research on animals has been around for at least 500 BC, but does all of this reasoning justify animal testing?
Although, animal testing may have saved people from diseases, but at what cost. “All procedures, even those classified as ‘mild,’ have the potential to cause the animals physical as well as psychological distress and suffering. Often the procedures can cause a great deal of suffering” (Humane Society International, 2017). Humane Society International (2017) also listed out common procedures used in animal testing: forced chemical exposure in toxicity testing, exposure to diseases, genetic manipulation, ear-notching, tail-clipping, periods of physical restraint, food and water deprivation, surgical procedures, infliction of pain to study its effects, behavioural experiments designed to cause distress, and killing by carbon dioxide asphyxiation, neck-breaking, decapitation, and other means. Not to mention, all of these procedures are cruel, and the animals can feel pain that has been inflicted upon it. In fact, a majority of these procedures is considered animal cruelty. According to the NDAA (2016), animal cruelty constitutes as “physical harm or killing,” and animal neglect is considered when failure to provide food and water. Practically all of the common procedures fit into these categories. Despite how animal testing aligns with animal cruelty, almost all state laws exempts animals in research (NDAA, 2016). So, it continues. Another negative aspect is how animal testing is unreliable; Humane
According to the Laboratory Animal Resource Center, “more than 100 million animals are killed in experiments each year in the United States” (qtd. in Technology). Animal experimentation is a scientific process that tests chemical substances on animal subjects versus human subjects to see how they react with the different body systems. This process has been used all over the world, but today, it is used in very few places around the world. Animal experimentation can be used for cosmetic research to see how makeup products, soaps, or moisturizers will react on the skin. This process can also be used for medical research to find cures or vaccines for various diseases. Animal experimentation is made to sound like a good thing, but in