Table of content
1. Introduction 2
2. Annotated Bibliography 2
3. Analysis 9
4. Recommendations for practice 12
5. Conclusion 12
References 13
1. Introduction
Employee engagement (EE) is an essential part of organizational life and of paramount interest to human resource management (HRM) professionals in the banking industry due to its influence on the organizational outcomes.
This paper therefore examines the topic with the aim of defining EE and identifying the use of, value and benefits of EE to be obtained from industry surveys. This paper begins with the annotated bibliographies of 12 journal articles, followed by an analysis of the relationship between these key findings. The researcher
…show more content…
The main limitation of this article is that the study does not include foreign banks, thus the authors indicate that further research needs to incorporate banks of foreign origin including more variables under the theoretical framework as well as multiple measurement methods enhancing the justifiability of the theoretical model like focus group interviews, nominal group technique, etc. This article will not form the basis of my research; however it will be useful supplementary information for my research on EE within the banking industry.
Wefald, A. J. & Downey, R. G. (2009). Job engagement in organizations: fad, fashion, or folderol? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 141-145.
In this A*-rated article Wefald and Downey review recent literature on EE answering the question if job engagement in organizations is a fad, fashion, or folderol. Their research focuses on the differences between the academic and organizational view of engagement, identifying that the organizational view focuses on macro issues versus researchers focus on the micro view which might influence measurement and other methods. The article is useful for my research topic as Wefald and Downey explore how organizations are using engagement. The main limitation of this article is that the literature review could have been further analysed in order to explain how EE could be influenced by HR practices. The authors
Employee engagement is today’s leadership priority. However, the catchphrase goes a long way back in the beginning of the 21st century. It has gained interest to this date, which can be credited to Gallup’s first version of the Q12 in the 1990s commonly termed as the Gallup Workplace Audit (Gallup Consulting, 2006). Subsequently, Gallup has continuously refined and expanded their Q12 for current business challenges. Furthermore, several literatures, surveys and evidence-based studies abound that exhibited positive results with employee engagement such as increased performance, safety, retention and profits among others.
Crim and Seijts (2006, p.1) define employee engagement as “a person who is fully involved in, and enthusiastic about, his or her work”. Employees that are engaged are inspired and go above and beyond their job functions to support the company and help the company achieve its goals. The lack of engaged employees are a major problem in the United States. According to Gallup, in 2014 only 31.5% of employees were engaged (Adkins, 2015). Even though this sounds low, it is actually the most engaged the United States workforce has been since 2000. The author’s research is important because if there is a link between leader’s
Employee Engagement essentially depicts our connection to our work, our organization, our customers, our effects and to results. In any study involving employee engagement the three aspects which are studied are: i.Employees as unique entities in terms of their skills, abilities, attitudes and aspirations., ii.Employee in their role to create conditions of engagement and iii.Relationship, trust and communication between employees across levels. The challenge is not only to attract the best talent but also to engage the employees like, raising opportunities for carrier development, life style decisions, job changing and unbalanced work life which influence an individual’s decision to continue or quite.
“Employee engagement” concept has been found in all organizations in present scenario and it plays a vital role in organization performance. Employee engagement is the mode by which an organization can develop a strong relationship between the organization and its employees. Employees should fully
The CIPD (2014) factsheet states that Employee Engagement is a concept that ‘is generally seen as an internal state of being – physical, mental and emotional – that brings together earlier concepts of work effort, organisational commitment, job satisfaction and ‘flow’ (or optimal experience)’. An engaged workforce willingly demonstrates discretionary effort within their roles; their goals and values reflect that of their employers/organisation; they express a passion for work, feel valued and that their work has meaning.
According to Aon Hewitt (2012), employee engagement refers to the “state of emotional and intellectual involvement that motivates employees to do their best work through examination of employees’ level of engagement relative to the organisation’s
1.3 Compare and contrast employee engagement with other related concepts; ‘flow’, organisational commitment, job involvement and job satisfaction.
Employee Engagement is a measurable degree of an employee's positive or negative emotional attachment to their job, colleagues and organisation which profoundly influences their willingness to learn and perform at work. Thus engagement is distinctively different from employee satisfaction, motivation and organisational culture.
Employee Engagement: It’s a known perception that an engaged workforce provides many intangible benefits that is linked directly to retention. HR policies should focus on employee engagement initiatives that stimulate motivation levels of employees to perform better and bond with organisation. This process should be initiated right from induction and continue throughout their tenure by opening channels of continuous communication and encouraging interpersonal relations. HR is responsible to incorporate methods to measure engagement and at regular intervals track engagement contribution to company’s success.
Engagement is a sign of satisfaction and loyalty to the firm which can be incurred by increasing job resources
Vorhauser-Smith, S. (2013, August 14). How the best places to work are nailing employee engagement. Retrieved 11 June 2013 from
Employee engagement, which reflects the emotional commitment an employee has to an organization is not just an organizational nicety but a business necessity due to direct ties to a number of performance outcomes, such as profitability,
Employee engagement has been a trend of management since 2004.(CMI 2015) ‘Some people may believe that engagement is just about employees ‘going the extra mile’, but it is much more.’(CMI 2014) Within globalization, how to apply employee engagement is significant for an organization to achieve their performance. A key aspect of employee engagement concerns how employees manage their position, performance and development in relationship to the company’s strategies. Therefore, according to Moenguc (2013), employee engagement has been personalized as a“persistent, positive affective-motivational state of fulfillment.” To demonstrate how this process affects the overall performance of an organization, John Lewis has been selected as the case study
Blessing white from the division of GP strategy defines employee engagement as “ the intersection of maximum contribution for the organization and maximum satisfactory for the individual,” (Blessingwhite.com,
Companies that have higher levels of engaged employees have higher earnings per share (EPS) than companies that have lower engagement levels (Kelleher, 2011). Engaged employees are more productive, have higher levels of customer loyalty and help their employers become more profitable. An engaged employee is less likely to leave their current position. This saves their company money because there is no need to spend money to hire and train new personal. These saving can be passed along to the employees for increased wages, bonuses, and benefits. All of these items help in motivating employees, to attempt to engage the disengaged.