Getting ready to implement the strategy: the planning process Assumption: (가정) * Single planning process can be followed for both a distributive and an integrative process. * Concentrate on distributive and integrative processes and the differences between them. * Both sides are individual negotiator. 1. Defining the issues. This step itself usually begins with an analysis of what is to be discussed in the negotiation. a. An analysis of all the possible issues that need to be decided. b. Previous experience in similar negotiations. c. Research conducted to gather information. d. Consultation with experts in that industry (real estate agents, mortgage lenders, attorneys, accountants, or friends who have …show more content…
The negotiator needs to know how the other party’s organization makes decisions to support or ratify an agreement. f. The other party’s reputation and negotiation style. How the other party’s predecessors have negotiated with you in the past. How the other party has negotiated with you in the past, either in the same or in different contexts. How the other party has negotiated with others in the past. g. The other party’s strategy and tactics. 9. Presenting issues to the other party Plan the process by which I will present and “sell” my ideas to the other party (and perhaps to my own constituency). a. What facts support my point of view? How can I validate this information as credible? b. Whom may I consult or talk with to help me elaborate or clarify the facts? What records, files, or data sources exist that support my arguments? Can I enlist experts to support my argument? c. Have these issues been negotiated before by others under similar circumstances? Can I consult those negotiators to determine what major arguments they used, which ones where successful, and which were not? d. What is the other party’s point of view likely to be? What are her or his interests? What arguments is she or he likely to make? How can I respond to those arguments and seek more creative positions that go further in addressing both sides’ issues and interests? e. How can I develop and present the facts
4. The final argument should be the strongest and the one backed up the most. It should be based not only on your personal views, as they could be a bit skewed, but also on the reader’s point of view.
Part 5: Connect the argument with facts that prove your points. Note the areas of objections and offer concessions if needed.
Negotiations are a part of daily life whether we are aware of them occurring or not. In everything that we do there are preferred end results and the end results are likely to affect more than one person. The goal in this however, is to ensure that all parties are equally benefited from the actions and reactions that occur to create that end result. While some dealings are done in a more subtle manner without a great deal of negotiation per say there are other situations that would warrant more vocalized mutually acceptable compromises. The purpose of this paper will be to effectively explain a situation of which required negotiation on the part of both parties that almost all of us have endured and that would be the process of buying a
Negotiation is a fundamental form of dispute resolution involving two or more parties (Michelle, M.2003). Negotiations can also take place in order to avoid any future disputes. It can be either an interpersonal or inter-group process. Negotiations can occur at international or corporate level and also at a personal level. Negotiations often involve give and take acknowledging that there is interdependence between the disputants to some extent to achieve the goal. This means that negotiations only arise when the goals cannot be achieved independently (Lewicki and Saunders et al., 1997). Interdependence means the both parties can influence the outcome for the other party and vice versa. The negotiations can be win-lose or win-win in nature.
1. How did you plan for the negotiation? Explain how you decided on a strategy?
Consequently, negotiation is a process that can be approached in many ways. No matter what strategy we choose, success lies in how well we prepared. The key to negotiating a beneficial outcome is the negotiators’ ability to consider all the elements of the situation carefully and to identify and think through the options. At the same time, negotiators must be able to keep events in perspective and be as fair and honest as circumstance allows. Because a common ground or interest has brought the parties to the negotiating table, a negotiator can benefit by trying to capitalize on this common
Pre-negotiation preparation is essential for the optimal outcome of a negotiation, as it allows one to design a strategy and plan that can increase the probability of a beneficial agreement. Good preparation means thorough understanding of one’s own and the other party’s relevant information, including interests, constraints, and tradable resources. An effective negotiator should know one’s own best
The first step to prepare for my negotiation is to outline the actual problem. While at
Once both sides have established a clear agenda and talking points now the can start the negotiation process. Each side will begin their arguments or persuasion points with each side taking turns listening before objecting the opposing side’s talking points. A good negotiator of any contract will or should poses one major important factor and that is confidence. Confidence is key to having a good chance of winning what you want in a negotiation. According to Oliver, D, How to Negotiate Effectively, (2011), Confidence is a key. “If you lose your own confidence, the counterpart will intuitively pick that up, and you will end the negotiation in a much weaker position than you need to. Tactics therefore need to be clear before you go into the negotiation. If
climate, strategy to use and at the same time knowing BATNA of both parties to
Getting to YES, Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In is an excellent book that discusses the best methods of negotiation. The book is divided into three sections that include defining the problem, the method to solve it, and possible scenarios that may arise when using these methods. Each section is broken down into a series of chapters that is simple to navigate and outlines each of the ideas in a way that is easy for any reader to comprehend. There are also several real life explanations for each issue that make the concepts easier to apply and understand. These ideas are reflective of a method developed by the Harvard Negotiation Project called “principled negotiation”. This method combines the two ideas of soft and hard negotiation
Both our approaches were directed towards addressing the issues with a collaborative spirit for the greatest benefit to both sides. We agreed that both sides wanted to establish a long term a relationship with each other and were willing to give genuine consideration to each other’s particular needs and interests. This experience has enabled me to reflect on my personal approach towards negotiation, as well as analyze my strengths and potential areas for improvement as a negotiator.
3. Summarize the legal arguments raised by the (a) plaintiff and by the (b) defendant.
In the first part of the negotiation checklist, self-assessment is necessary in order to determine what you want out of the negotiation process. You must determine the goals that you have in this negotiation, so you can determine what you want out of the deal or process. After the goals are set, each issue must be determined then be assessed as to
Whether it is at work, church or in our private relationships, negotiations are a necessary tool for reaching an agreement. They are made by discussing each parties point of view with the aim being to reach an agreement that is mutually beneficial. For the most part, negotiation is the process by which those people involved successfully adopt or abandon their respective position through the use of positional bargaining. There are different types of approaches for the negotiation process - some hard and others soft in their manner of approach. The desired outcome of