with him or her. The other part was the republican's effect. Since these are the major critics, they knew how to withhold support from coming trough to the Democrats. They criticized every single issue that these Democrats told of the health care system. These made it possible for them to conquer the battle and defeat the Democrats in their quest to deliver healthcare systems. If the opposing side becomes stronger than the proposing side, it weakens the government says on an issue. The issue is over politicized and hence seen as of no importance and no use to the citizens of a particular nation. (Rao 2012) Another interest of the group is the use of blame game when many critics are given to the one who proposed an individual issue. …show more content…
These would only mean that even when this bill was drafted to be passed as a law, the Republicans would have rejected it. (Jacobs 2015) The policy process was vague since Clinton had not considered putting the right measures of advocating for this project. If he would come up with a more realistic pattern of undertaking the process, then it would have been simpler to make people agree to the project since it was an excellent program. The environment that this policy had to be taken through was hostile. These are because the Democrats were not in standard terms hence the delivery would have failed to have gone through. If a side does not have a clear view on what to implement it is always correct for such a party to discuss the way forward on what approaches they would have taken to convey to the public. There was turmoil in the party at that time, so Clinton should never have advocated for the advocacy of that bill at such a time. Hence he would have waited for the political diversion to cool down to proceed with the healthcare plans. Another thing that this leader would have done was to select another leader to head the policy rather than his wife. This policy would have been respected more and more people would have conquered with the bill for the well-being of the country. Lastly, Clinton was supposed to show his leadership authority by bringing the party to one decision. Hence this was easier for him to allocate what its members expected. (Tesler 2012)
The immediate problem was that was it possible for the White House to agree and act jointly with the President on the healthcare reform. The reason is because too many healthcare reforms had been failed and it was a very big step to take.
The Kids in the group were accepted to a white school about 60 years ago. Those kids were, Maurice Soles, Anna Theresser Caswell, Alfred Williams, “Poochie” Hayden, Regina Smith, Latham Gail Upton, JoAnne Boyce, Robert Thacker, Bobby Cain, Minnie Jones, and Alvah McSwain were all part of the Clinton 12. These 12 individuals changed the thought of themselves by going to 1 school. Bobby Cain, said in his in words, “The only thing I was thinking about was my saftey of entering the school”. I bet that was pretty scary for that whole group not just Bobby.
The New York Times printed an article by Robert Pear, which reported that on December 24, 2009, the US senate passed the first bill, which would call for major reform regarding health care in the United States (Pear). The article titled “Senate Passes Health Care Overhaul on Party-Line Vote,” discusses the fact that while this step was a major milestone in the process of providing Americans with affordable heath care, it was not the end of the road. Over the coming months and years there would be a lot of give and take between democrats and republicans to revise the bill to the point where both sides could support it. One of the major points in this reform is that the US government was now going to offer affordable plans including subsidy options which would allow more Americans affordable options which were
4). Why did it fail, some say that it wasn't strong enough some say that he should have backed others. Bill Clinton idea of a health reform consisted of health care being available to all Americans and legal residents. The plan would cover health, mental, and substance abuse. Clinton had a good plan. However, the request and demands that were needed were not smiled upon form all parties. Clinton's plan would demand for employers to pay 80% of coverage for their employers including part time workers and their families, subsidies would be available for those that feel under a certain income threshold. Clinton plan would also call for insurance companies to become involved. He would need to negotiate with insurance companies to find affordable plans that could be used across the board. With that he would need for the basic package to cover hospital stay by patients, mental and substance abuse, families planning have increasing their family, as well as better check ups for women during and after pregnancy. The reform establishes new structures and defined responsibilities that may increase accountability to enrollees and to public agencies(Brown, 1994, pg.184., vol. 84, No.
The immediate problem was that was it possible for the White House to agree and act jointly with the President on the healthcare reform. The reason is because too many healthcare reforms had been failed and it was a very big step to take.
One of the biggest concern of the nation is the health care, because more then half a million people do not have insurance. The Democratic and Republican worked together to improve the issue, but there was not any solution through any of our past president. Until President Barak Obama signed and passed the Affordable Care Act on March 23, 2010, which is also known as ObamaCare. This act reforms the combination of control health care cost, and the development of coverage through the public and private insurance
What frequently resulted was that the standing President of the United States was blamed each time for not writing strong enough legislation, rather than the congresses that would not pass the bills. For example, during the battle over the Affordable Care Act, blame was passed at President Obama, at his cabinet, and at anyone in Washington DC who fought for health care reform. Little to no blame was aimed at pharmaceutical companies, or at Congress members who fought tooth and nail to block the bill. While talking about the years of debate over health care reform, Dan Pfeiffer describes to Front Line's "Obama's Deal" that "The process was messy, and so it turned people off. It ended up being behind closed doors. It was filled with a lot of partisan wrangling, people yelling at each other across the table. We ended up having a process that represented a lot of what the American people hated about Washington". American citizens began to get involved with politics. Even though they had elected a man to presidency who had promised reform, the citizens opposed the legislation once they studied it. They looked at the wording of the Affordable Care Act, and identified the problems that they had with it. They spoke to local officials, called state officials, and wrote letters to their representatives and
The idea of affordable healthcare for everyone was exciting to them. However, it did not take very long for people to realize that the promises that had been made were not completely honest.
The citizens of the United States are burdened with many hardships. Most of these hardships stem from poor political policies and programs set forth by past politicians. However, politicians cannot be the only blame. This country is relatively young. Our political policies are still in somewhat of a “beta” period. We only learn from trial and error. This country is in the middle of a political shift. Now is the time to make the necessary changes to mold and shape our future society for the better. Far too long have Americans been denied basic necessities such as education, food, employment, and most importantly healthcare. The healthcare crisis has been the topic of debate for many years among politicians across all the governmental factions. The catalyst applying the brake on healthcare progress has been a strong division of politicians on what is ethical and what is legal when it comes to the government putting its foot in the door. Along with that debate there is also whether or not the government should do anything at all or just let the private sector and the citizens hash it out. Throughout U.S. history many attempts have been made to reform our healthcare system to no avail. Healthcare reform is clearly an issue that takes great socioeconomic knowledge and political tact. President Barack Obama is the first president to present us with such a plan. This plan is known as The Affordable Care Act or “Obamacare” (a term coined by a group of Republicans to disenfranchise
During the first month of his mandate, Clinton introduced many reforms initiatives related with foreign polity, also remove legal barriers to abortion, and attempted to end the ban on entry of the homosexuals in the military. Unfortunately, his last plan was modified after encountering with an strong opposition in the Congress and the
“Vice presidents who have succeeded to the presidency on the death of the President have been less effective in their conduct of domestic AND foreign policy than the men they replaced”. There have been many incidents where the vice president has had to take office. This occurs when the president is either assassinated or impeached or if they pass away. When Kennedy was assassinated, Johnson took over and when Franklin D. Roosevelt died, Truman took over for him. Kennedy and Truman focused more on the foreign affairs, whereas FDR and Johnson focused most of their time on domestic policies.
Clinton’s attempt to pass healthcare reform fail because of the great lost political opportunities where the deals were never close due to the decisions of the groups between Republicans and Democrats.
While the President may believe that the US is doing more and gaining almost nothing from having military bases in East Asia, the reasons which will be explained below will argue otherwise with the full intention of convincing the President to continue the political stance taken by previous Presidents. The Trump administration may think that US bases in the East Asian region is not mutually beneficial, but a parasitical relationship, but numbers, statistics, and data beg to disagree. Even from a logical standpoint of diplomacy, the US gains a lot by having its military bases in the region. The President is considering withdrawing our troops if these countries “don’t do their part” but political experts concur that these countries indeed do and exceeds what’s expected of them. While on the veneer, the US receives nothing in return the following paragraphs of facts and logic may convince the President that having such bases is more favourable. The US should unceasingly extend our support to our allies in East Asia and other regions all over the world because it will be beneficial to project our military power and denuclearization is the way of the future.
The name of my President is Bill Clinton, the 42nd President of the United States of America. Bill Clinton was born on August 19, 1946, in the small town of Hope, Arkansas. Bill was named after his father, William Jefferson Blythe II, who had been killed in a car accident just three months before he was born. Bill’s birth name was William Jefferson Blythe III. His mother, Virginia Cassidy Blyth, moved to New Orleans, Louisiana, to study nursing and find a way to support herself and Bill Clinton, and he stayed with his grandparents in Hope. Eldridge and Edith Cassidy taught Bill strong values and beliefs teaching him that everyone is created equal no matter how different of skin or race they seemed. His mother returned in
In this paper I will provide my understanding on why I feel Clinton’s Health Plan was unsuccessful. I will discuss the features of Clinton’s health care reform plan and provide my reasons I feel it failed. I will also discuss the influences of the various interests groups and governmental entities that were present during this process. Lastly I will discuss the policy process and policy environment key players that were involved and the other circumstances that shaped this policy-making effort.