According to Spector (2012), there are five major methods used to assess knowledge, skill, ability, and other (KSAOs) however the three I chose to compare and contrast include biographical inventory, interviews, and assessment center. When comparing these three you must keep in mind that the main similarity they share is the ability to give and overall picture of the applicant, which will help, determine if they have the ability to do the job and or fit in within the organization. Another comparison would be between biographical inventory and interviewing in that both are searching to understand the type of work you have performed in the past, how well you did that work, and how long you were with the organization that you did the work.
There are many tools and techniques available to assess and develop our skills such as observations, evaluations, one-to-ones, peer feedback for example. Detailed below are two of the tools which I have utilised to assess current skills and abilities and highlight my development needs which are:
(a) There are typically six assessment methods that we can chose to employ within your role. These are listed below along with examples of when and how they could be implemented:
As a college based Management Apprenticeship assessor and trainer working within Corporate Development Training nationwide, I use a range of assessment methods.
When you go for your interview you will have a written exam, oral interview, physchological profile, polygraph examination, medical examination, vision examination, drug screening, background investigation, physical fitness and ability screening. All of these will be
* Self-evaluation: ask the person to describe how they think they are progressing. * Observation: direct observation of how the person is performing in their role. * Feedback: from people who use the service and their close networks as well as colleagues. * Reflection: ask the person to reflect on an aspect of their work, usually a specific incident, and explain what they learned from it. * Questions: to test the person understanding of a topic in more depth. * Evidence: of accredited training in a particular area.
KSAO or Knowledge, Abilities, Skills, and Other Characteristics (KSAO) tests are metrics used either during training or hiring processes to evaluate applicants and trainees. The KSAO will typically measure several areas of competency and will use a weighted metric for analysis. The following examples are what one might see in the explanation of the job of Professor of Human Resource Management.
Unit 2, 1.1, unit 3, 1.1,1.2,1.3- I have also learned and familiarised myself with different methods of assessment that can be used to assess competence and knowledge. They are namely: Observation of performance in the work environment and simulated environments- used in practical situation in work environment where a learner demonstrates their competence (natural performance) whilst learners are being observed. Simulation-this is similar to observation but a simulated activity is used rather than natural performance to assessed learners. Simulation is used when it has not been possible to carry out a task. Examining products of work- assesment is done on the culmination of learner 's training, e:g certificates, health and safety reports, memos, checklist for patiaent care, letters, charts. Questioning the learner, witness testimony: any other people who has been involved with the learner 's progress can write a statemen to show how the learner has successfully covered relevant aspects of the courset, learners ' personal statement: it is a reflective account where learners explains the thinking behind their decision to take certain approach or why they decided to change aspects of a task or activity ,
This profile assessment assisted me in discovering that I’m no longer that little girl that sat back and allowed persons to say and do anything to her anymore. I’ve empowered myself to be the best that I can be along with putting forth my best. Therefore, I’m learning how to differentiate fact from fiction every day.
Throughout my work with candidates I use number of different assessment methods as well as assessment categories. Assessment is a number of different methods which are used to evaluate performance and can be used measured against set criteria.
Questioning is a method of testing knowledge by asking the learner a series of questions related to the performance criteria. It is important that the assessor plans the questions beforehand, ensuring that open questions are used, and identifies the means of recording them, whether it be written; voice recorded or videoed. Questioning can be a very useful assessment method used alongside other methods. With observation, in particular, ‘what if’ questions can be used for evidence that might be hard to obtain, for example.
Interviews - This is often the second step in a selection process, it is often used after a group of applicants have been short listed and allows the recruiter or hiring manager an opportunity to ask further questions about an applicants experience and get a feel for their personality, and fit into the organisation and role.
The Myers and Briggs Analysis is a series of questions that when answered are examined and grouped together in order to determine the personalities of those taking this test. This particular test can result in sixteen different outcomes or types of personalities, which is determined by four different categories that judge if you are introverted or extroverted, use your senses or your intuition, your choice to think or use your feelings, and finally if you are judgmental or perceptive. These series of questions are designed to judge our personalities and help us to determine which career pathways we will be most suited for based on our personality traits and abilities to work well with others, which is important
The advantages of relying on tests or assessments to select the best job candidate is highly dependent of whether or not the assessment measures the most influential business outcomes for the company doing the hiring. It is important to remember that evaluating candidates is not the primary goal when using assessments. Improving performance outcomes of employees is the ultimate goal of choosing and using the most effective assessment. Companies are in business to increase their bottom line. Learning about their potential employees and
Self assessment tools that are provided in this unit’s read section include the peak performer self assessment test, the learning style inventory, and the four temperament profile (Bethel University, 2013). Upon completing these tests, one can determine the type of learner that they are and whether that learning style is visual, auditory, or kinesthetic.
The personality assessment inventory tests provide results on my individual personality, values, motivation, decision making, communication, team skills, conflict skills, organizational structure preference, and stress. These results are broken down briefly in three parts and do not include any personal speculation or analysis as to their meaning. The application of these results are further applied and explains how the results noted from the tests and in the first step will make me a better employee, co-worker, and manager within my organization. These tests mentioned above are applied in conjunction with particular examples on how I can achieve becoming a better employee, co-worker, and manager. An explanation of how my personality and experiences were affected by the Holy Spirit is also discussed. Particularly, how potential weaknesses have become strengths with the guidance of the Lord.