Comparing The DISC And Jung Typology Personality Assessments

ways to lead, and each style comes with its own pros and cons. Identifying which style of management is

A1. Leadership Style Upon conducting research, it is clear that the definition of “leadership” is not agreed upon. It is fluid, based upon many perceptions, situations, and surroundings. According to Robinson (2010), adopting a specific style of leadership is rather futile as it is, “contingent on the personal traits of the leader, the people being led, and the nature of the activity.” Tools are available to help guide potential leaders in determining a preferred style of leadership. For example, utilizing the “Leadership Self-Assessment

Would change from my previous leadership style and apply some of my best assets which

The Jung Personality Test, was a test, trying to figure out about what kind of person I am. The test had many different questions it was asking and I would answer them truthfully. Through this test, I learned I was extroverted, sensitive, a thinker/feeler and perceiving.

Other forms of leadership styles that are known to exist derive from the Leadership Style Inventory (LSI) developed by Rowe, Reardon, and Bennis (1995). The inventory identifies four basic styles; commanding, logical, inspirational and supportive. The differences in style used by leaders are based on the following two questions: How adaptive are leaders when dealing with the issues they face? How do leaders communicate with, persuade, and energize employees in the process of change?

7) Reflection – Introspection and reflection can foster self-understanding and understanding from lessons learned from experience. In leadership development, reflection can be used to uncover a person’s hidden goals, talents, and values, as well as their impact on a person’s work.

Many different people have extremely different personality types such as, perfectionist, helper, leader, adventurer, and peacemaker. I am a variety of personalities from perfectionist to unorthodox. Due to the Jung Typology personality test, I am very extroverted and intuitive and I tend to get conflicted. Also, I am confident and sympathetic. I am extremely sociable and I enjoy the comfort of talking to friends. Even though sometimes I may be confused, I have the strength to straighten out. I have the kind of personality that will allow people to be who they want to be. I look at people the way they want to be looked at unconditionally. Last, I tend to get nervous and worried in tense situations. I have always been this way, but it goes away

The DISC assessment, similar to the Jung-Typology, I felt was not as accurate and I

The Jung Typology Test provided information that was, for the most part, expected.These results do seem to be an accurate depiction of my personality. This said, my belief is that the results could change depending on who I associate with at the time. This is perhaps the reason why the percentages are fairly low on the final report.

Leadership should inspire confidence and trust, and consistently. How agile is your company? How effective are your managers at engaging and delivering the changes envisioned by your decision makers? How well does your company actually facilitate and execute on change when it is needed?

With the long-term goal of becoming a transformational leader, it is often useful to consider one's strengths and weak nesses across four dimensions. These include personal and professional accountability, career planning, personal journey disciplines and reflect practice reference behaviors and tenets. The intent of this analysis is to evaluate my strengths and weaknesses in each of these four areas. In addition, a discussion will be completed on how current leadership skill sets will be used for advocating change in my workplace. The conclusion of the paper will concentrate on one personal goal for leadership growth, including an implementation plan leading to its fulfillment.

My personal experience with leadership covers a variety of professional and personal endeavors. Working as an administrator, radio and TV producer, and business owner, necessitated the application of relative approaches. Succeeding in developing and implementing strategies, which enabled me to accomplish desirable results, required implementing viable techniques. Self-growth and enhanced subordinate participation required the utilization of an admixture of

In terms of leadership styles a wide variety exists for one to employ (Boykins, 2013). There isn’t firm consensus as to which styles prove to be the most effective. Different situations call for different approaches. In the article, Empirical Study of Leadership Styles, it discusses several leadership styles that I can relate to.

This analysis is basically a self-assessment of the current leadership and motivational skills that I possess. Throughout this course I have learned numerous new skills and tools to better the way a person leads and motivates their followers. For example, I use the situational approach to leadership but I use the skills approach in combination with the path-goal theory to influence others. This could be bettered by implementing more of the path-goal theory in the way I lead as well and the way I influence others. Although, the skills and traits that I possess have been working will there is always room for improvement. There are a number of traits I would like to strive to possess such as integrity, dominance and conscientiousness. The greatest factor to helping someone or yourself attain self-improvement goals is to develop a plan and determine ways that will be effective for the change.

This report also looked at different leadership styles and stated what your personality type and which