Deena Matthews
Final Paper Outline
Review the Final Paper instructions in Week Five of the online course or in the “Components of Course Evaluation” section of this guide. Then, visit the Ashford Writing Center, within the Learning Resources tab on the left navigation toolbar, and review the Outline Form page. Format your outline for the Final Paper according to the Outline Form page. The outline must contain:
Introduction with thesis statement
At least five body paragraphs
Conclusion
Reference page containing at least three academic resources, two of which are found in the Ashford Online Library
Introduction- Thesis Statement
I want to provide strategies for resolving or managing interpersonal conflict within a
…show more content…
We don't actually swap ideas, we swap symbols that stand for ideas. This also complicates communication. Words (symbols) do not have inherent meaning; we simply use them in certain ways, and no two people use the same word exactly alike.
Body Paragraph #3
Topic Sentence: Evaluate appropriate levels of self-disclosure in relationships.
Supporting Evidence:
As with all communication, it must also be appropriate to the context in which the communication occurs. For example, sharing intimate details about your relationships or discussing personal issues in professional situations such as the classroom or the workplace is inappropriate in most circumstances. Disclosure that is inappropriate to the context is referred to as over-disclosure. To determine what is appropriate, you must consider the context in which the communication occurs, the amount (how much information you disclose), the depth (to what level of detail), duration (how long you talk), the target (the nature of your relationship with the other person), and the situation (the time and place of the disclosure)
Body Paragraph #4
Topic Sentence: Recognize how words have the power to create and affect attitudes, behavior, and perception.
Michael Dorris utilizes miscommunication to reveal the dysfunctionality and misunderstandings
Lapses in communication are something everyone has had personal experience with. While reading, a previous relationship kept popping into my head. As Tannen wrote about some of the communication issues in her marriage, I couldn’t stop myself from drawing parallels between our former relationships. The
In the article “Close Relationships Sometimes Mask Poor Communication” reachers discuess how often times being close with someone, can have a negative impact on our communications skills with those we care for the most. According to the atricical often times we expect the person we are close to understand what we want or need without actually explaining it to them. The aritical supplied several examples in which I am personally guilty of. One example was when a wife made a statement about it getting hot in the room, she was impling that she wanted the air condiniter tempture adjusted, while her husband mistook the statement in a more sexual way.
The paper must be three pages in length (excluding title and reference page) and in APA (6th edition) format. You must use at least three resources, one of which must be the course text, and two resources must either be found in the Ashford Online Library or from the provided sources. If you would like to refer to APA samples and tutorials, log into the Ashford Writing Center (located in the Learning Resources tab in the left navigation bar). Click on the “APA & Research Guides” tab and review the resources.
1. The following video will show you how to write the body of the paper:
Please note: APA referencing style is required for all students commencing study in Semester 2, 2014 or later.
If you need more guidance, you can find a sample outline in the Ashford Writing Center, located under Learning
Week 5--Annotated bibliography for the Final Paper. Your bibliography should include references to at least six outside sources. Also required is a brief, one-paragraph summary of the publication and your reasoning as to why this source is important to the topic you are investigating.
In this essay I have chosen to compare two opposing theories, Immanuel Kant 's absolutist deontological ethics and Joseph Fletchers relativist situation ethics. The deontological ethics focuses on actions made according to duty and the categorical imperative - which shows how acts are intrinsically good or bad. The situation ethics state that no act is intrinsically good or bad, and that actions should b made according to love. From this perspective it looks as thought Kant 's views were less personal than Fletcher 's, although in actuality both focus on the best outcome for humans.
“The fact that we have been communicating all of our lives does not mean that we do it well”. (Sole, 2011).
To him it was very easy to disclose private information about him and his family. Since one of us was more disclosing it became a challenge in our relationship, as time went by I learned to trust him, let him know my vulnerability and I took a risk of opening to him. It turned out to be a very and happy relationship where I allowed myself to let go and have someone I can talk to things that I would not want to bother my mother with. and also allowed myself to let him know of my deepest fears and my inner most feelings When it comes to self disclosure at work, I am not one to disclose to my co-workers since I feel like my private life and my work place are two different entities and what I may tell my co-worker can be used against me one day, therefore I disclose as less as possible.
Visit the Write Site on campus after you have prepared a final draft. Then revise your final draft using Write Site suggestions.
On the one hand, Tannen’s logic maybe problematic, as she assumes that communication is the heart of the greatest marital problems. Even though this was in written in 1990 many aspect of marital problems have risen, into many different problems. For instance, marriage does not always end due to the lack of communication, anything
Individuals have different levels of disclosure and when combined with another individual’s disclosure level can have positive or negative outcomes. The decision to communicate can also cause uncertainty within relationships. Prior research was conducted to try and measure what exactly causes the uncertainty and negative results to show up in a relationship. Intimacy, security, problematic events, and irritations are all different elements that can be stronger or weaker in the relationship based on the disclosure (Theiss and Solomon 2006).
Self-disclosure is the voluntary sharing of personal history, preferences, attitudes, feelings, values, secrets, etc. with another person (Griffin, p. 97). As stated in the introduction Altman and Taylor look at relationships as an “onions.” The different layers are representative of different feelings of a person. When