How Transformational Leadership Can Help Chinese Family Company And State Owner Company Be More Successful?

Leadership theories denotes to the technique that a manager accepts in order to implementation authority in the work place and be able to direct workforce towards convention the structural mandate as outlined in their job descriptions. It is the approach that a director recourses in order to discharge all the sum total of accountabilities that involves organization and managing. The theories of leadership might be categorized into, Trait theory, and Behavioral theory and Transactional & Transformational theories and Situational Theory of leadership.

To ensure leadership effective, several leadership theories are put forward and are adopted by different organizations. Some widely accepted theories include Trait Approach, Style Approach, Situational Approach, New Leadership Approach and Post-charismatic & Post-transformational (Western, 2013). Beyond doubt, they have their pros and cons, and they could play their role to guarantee the effectiveness of leadership as long as they are applied in an appropriate condition.

All the theories speak about the same aspect of leader, that they can access the key follower and situational factors.

Trait theories were first of the four most common leadership theories. The foundation of trait theory is; leaders are born with the innate ability to lead. In essence, leadership traits are inherent in the genetic makeup of an individual and are natural, not learned predispositions. On the contrary, current research has found leadership traits to be external behaviors emerging from development of cognitive discipline and knowledge growth.

“Some of the traits central to the lists of almost all the researchers studying trait leadership over the years are intelligence, drive, integrity, and sociability” (Khan, 2013, p.831). While, past research has not proven trait theory to be all that accounts for good leadership, recent research has made trait theory relevant again (Khan, 2013, p.832). Robbins (2009) states that research efforts to find a set of universal leadership traits failed. Behavioral theory is different from trait theory in many ways. “Behavioral theories support the idea that individuals can be trained to be leaders” (Satterlee, 2013, p.105). The manner in which a person reacts in a situation with others is what behavioral theorists looked at. Behaviors are not set in stone, behaviors can be modified meaning that leaders can be made. Both theories try to explain what makes one person over another a success leader.

Transformational leadership. Burns (1978) is recognized as one of the earliest theorist on transformational leadership, who introduced transformational leadership over 30 years ago. Transformational leaders are perceived as leaders who uplift their employee morale, subsequently uplifting the entire organizational. Transformational leaders are known by their capacity to inspire followers to forgo self-interests in achieving superior results for the organization (Clawson, 2006). Avolio and Yammarino (2002) shared Bass’s explanation of transformational leadership as leaders who act as agents of change that stimulate, and transform followers’ attitudes, beliefs, and motivate from lower to higher level of arousal.

Trait theories were first of the four most common leadership theories. The foundation of trait theory is; leaders are born with the innate ability to lead. In essence, leadership traits are inherent in the genetic makeup of an individual and are natural, not learned predispositions. On the contrary, current research has found leadership traits to be external behaviors emerging from development of cognitive discipline and knowledge growth.

Carey, 2015). Therefore, we come to learn that transformational leaders are often necessary and utilized to transform an inadequate low performance organization into an adequate high performance organization. In other occurrences, a transformation leader is expected to rescue an organization from a crisis. However, in order to carry out and achieve this task, it is vital for the leader to overhaul the organizational culture and subculture that may be prevalent. This task can be accomplished through nine methods of transforming other individuals such as: 1. Raise and increase awareness. It is vital that the leader makes other individuals aware of potential rewards and how they may be achieved. For example, pride in the job as well as offering financial incentives and bonuses. 2. Facilitate others in looking past self-interest. It is vital for the transformational leader to help others acknowledge and comprehend the big picture through explaining the presenting the whole scenario. For example, if an organization is to hire more employees to carry out certain task there will be cuts in various other areas. 3. Help individuals achieve self-fulfillment. The transformative leader assist others in not focusing on minor satisfactions such as completing a job prior to the deadline due to the fact that an individual did not take days off, this helps the organization grow and

This article aims to discuss the weakness of transformational leadership style. As we know there are two kinds of leadership styles namely the transformational and transactional leadership.

If we focus on the idea that people can poses different personality and characteristics can be linked to successful leadership across various situation this would be defined as the trait theory of leadership. Some researcher believe that the ability to lead was something that a person was born with and not something that could be developed or learn. Many people still believe that leaders just have an intuition that makes them good at making decision and developing

Transformational leaders influence subordinates through inspiration, storytelling, and relationship building. According to Bernard Bass one of the early developers of transformational leadership theory, transformational leadership is a form of leadership that occurs when leaders “broaden and elevate the interests of their employees, when they generate awareness and acceptance of the purposes and the mission of the group, and when

While Trait theory has helped us understand how traits are related to leadership behavior and effectiveness, it does not identify which traits are the most important for effective leaders and, there is no proven correlation between leader qualities and standards of leader success. Additionally, leadership qualities and traits alone are not sufficient for achieving effectiveness. Thus, some of the problems with the trait approach to leadership were the theory’s failure to address leadership development and the how or why traits develop. The theory does not account for personality changes. Moreover, Trait theory does not consider situational factors relating to the leader’s role in the organization, the culture of the organization, or the environment affecting the organization.

Transformational leadership is an effective leadership style for producing positive changes and strengthening organizations. These leaders are passionate, energetic, and focused on helping every member of the group succeed. The four dimensions of transformational leadership garner trust, respect, and admiration from followers in the organization. Organizational commitment results from employees being satisfied and devoted to the vision of the company. Another important trait of a transformational leader is emotional intelligence. It is necessary in relationship building and managing emotions in situations. Recognizing the limitations of transformational leadership and understanding the assets of various leadership styles will help a leader determine which style is most suitable for the occasion.

The transformational school of leadership was discussed in detail by Burns in his seminal work on leadership (1978). He defines two leadership styles, transactional and transformational leaders. The former, more directive style maintains a relationship with the follower with the purpose of exchanging items of value. The latter style involves a greater involvement and communication exchanges between the leaders and follower.

There are so many leadership theories has been explained from ages, here some theories, are commonly categorised by which aspect is believed to define the leader the most widespread one’s are: