Job Evaluation, Performance Management, And Compensation

Organizations are growing in size each and every day, which in turn creates a high demand for employees. This outcome, however, needs a systematic approach to determine the right employee for the right position. The process has become so large that organizations need specialized help from Human Resource Management (HRM) departments to ensure that the requirements of the position are met. Therefore, the HRM department provides the function of job analysis in order to select the right individual for the position. "Job analysis is a complex and vital part of every HRM program, as well as an important systematic process used within an organization to determine future members of the workforce." Job analysis

Performance appraisal is an important issue in human resource management and has a significant effect in the performance of an organisation. It is the system of evaluating the performance of employees regarding the accomplishment of their responsibilities and determining their potential to grow and develop. Bias in the evaluation process can affect the accuracy and appropriateness of the performance appraisal. Bias is a serious issue because it affects the ability to make appropriate decisions about the promotion of employees. A performance appraisal system that works to the disadvantage of members of a group can also pose legal issues.

Performance assessments are ingrained in many businesses and used as a way to determine pay for performance. This evaluation format according to Daniel’s is because there is not a better option available and that they are often well defined ad thus should not be used. Furthermore, all sources agree that conducting a performance assessment has negative emotional associations with staff. During a performance assessment, staff often received good and bad news. When money is directly tied to this association, staff often skimming over the good news and listening only to the bad as it indicates their potential pay raise or not.

Human Resource (HR) managers work with top managers in order to create jobs and develop high-performing workforces. HR managers design jobs that fulfill the needs of the business and align with organizational goals. However, before jobs are created, HR managers need to understand what tasks and duties are required. The process of identifying the tasks and duties needed for a job is referred to as Job Analysis (Noe, Hollenbeck, Gerhart, & Wright, 2014). A job analysis is important because it assists managers with recruiting, performance management, compensation, and ensuring equal treatment (Stewart & Brown, 2012). Ultimately, the information gathered from job analyses are used to develop job descriptions. This paper will demonstrate

Job analysis is often referred to as the “corner stone” of HR activities because almost every HR management process includes some type of information gathered from job analysis. Job analysis provides knowledge for the following HR processes: work re-design, workforce planning, selection, training and development, performance management, career planning, and job evaluation (Steen, Noe, Hollenbeck, Gerhart, & Wright, 2013, p.66-67). The information job analysis provides, acts as the building blocks to these HR activities, thus bringing an understanding to job analysis being referred to as the “corner stone”.

Each article makes it clear that job analysis plays an important part in Human Resources Management (HRM) in that it helps set pay levels, aids in recruitment, interviewing, selection and placement, and helps both the supervisor and HR determine training requirements for incumbents.

In this paper I will be describing effective performance appraisals and how they can increase employee performance. I will provide examples of strategic advantages in the performance appraisals process and also give examples of potential unfairness in the employee appraisal system.

A job analysis is a process used to determine and identify the details of a specific job requirement or duties and the significance of these duties for the given job (Spector, 2008). In a job analysis there are also judgments about the data collected on-the-job (Fine & Crinshaw, 1999). It is also important to remember that a job analysis is conducted for the job position and not the person. The data collected for a job analysis comes from current questionnaires or interviews, the specification and description of the job (Spector, 2008). The main purpose of a job analysis is to document and establish the job relatedness of employment procedures such as interviewing,

To start the staffing process, we must first have a job analysis. The job analysis helps evaluate how to enhance and become effectiveness and efficiency. A comparison of each position contributes to ensuring the accuracy of assigned duties. The result will produce two human qualities documents that are needed to perform a job. A job description provides the job title, a purpose of the job, authority reporting levels, detail of primary duties of the position, and the conditions of

“Evaluator should specifically advocate for the program/project being evaluated, but rather should advocate for an inclusive, open evaluation process that will lead to the retention of good services and the improvement of bad services, in a way that is seen as appropriate and acceptable by the program’s stakeholders.” (Mathison, 1998) Second, is grade creep. Grade creep is undefined rise in the median grade of employees within the agency. This increase can cause a rupture, where taxpayer would complain and states their local government is overpaid and underworked. In addition, this can be cause by the connection and pay ranges. Third, is if evaluation system is removed, workers will undermined the effectiveness and efficiency of their job duties. Forth, challenges are they are not fair. “Regarding fairness and equity, the accuracy and objectivity of job analysis and classifications actions have always been suspect because none of the systems in use comes close to completely eliminating professional or managerial judgment and discretion.” (Nigro, 2007)

It is one the most important processes carried out by the Human Resource Management departments in many organizations. It contributes to many Human Resource Management functions and helps to identify and develop the relations between jobs and requirements. It is one the most critical steps in a job selection process as well as in writing the job description and job specifications. Basically, Job Analysis forms the core of the Human Resources Management functions. WORKS CITEDDressler, Gary. Human Resource Management.

One of the most misunderstood tools used by managers in today’s businesses is the performance evaluation. At its basic level, the performance evaluation is a tool that allows an organization to evaluate an employee’s past performance compared with a set of performance standards (Dessler, 2015). These evaluations may be used to determine pay and compensation, promotions, terminations, training and development opportunities, and more (Mulvaney, McKinney, & Grodsky, 2012). Although the idea of providing feedback on job performance seems simple, many organizations struggle to develop a performance evaluation system that is fair to employees, easy for managers to use, and that measures key areas of performance. A study of 100 large U.S. corporations showed that all of the companies used some sort of performance evaluation system, but half of the corporations were considering making major changes to their system and six percent of the firms said they were considering eliminating the process altogether (Lawler, Benson, & McDermot, 2012). Given the importance of providing feedback about performance and the potential organizational benefits of an effective process, eliminating performance evaluations is not likely to result in success for employees or the

According to Zweig (1991), performance appraisal instruments are tools that are used to measure the performance of employees in the workplace. They are used to put employees up against one another or a predetermined standard, and the appraiser is required to give an evaluation. Practical and effective performance appraisal instruments are drafted when the company has already clarified its philosophy and performance management system. It is also imperative that the performance appraisal instruments are calculated accurately, and that the supervisors are empowered to produce

My topic is performance appraisal and compensation. This topic is something that we often deal with where I work and there are huge inconsistencies throughout the department. It is also something that I am very passionate about.

An incentive pay program can reward employees who continue to produce superior work or encourage employees who already produce good work to best. Sometimes, use an incentive system when employees are lack of enthusiasm of getting down to work and improving things. If everyone in the same job classification gets the same pay, there is no real incentive to do an outstanding job (French, 1990). Various incentive plans used to motivate all employees such as production staff, sales staff, administrative staff and managerial and professional staff on an individual basis. To be improved employee work performance, the incentive pay programs need to be fairly matched with the employees’ expectation. Properly designed and maintained incentive pay program has the potential to increase employees’ productivity and work performance.