Management and Leadership Paper

The biggest difference between managers and leaders is the way they motivate people to follow them. Managers have a position within the organisation, their teams work for them to complete tasks and in turn manage situations as they occur. Leaders on the other hand do not have teams when they are leading. Instead, formal control is given up, as to lead is have followers and this is always a voluntary activity. Telling people what to do does not inspire

Every person has some kind of good and evil traits within their personality, but what really defines good and evil? People from different cultures could consider different traits to be “good” or “evil” or even a little of both. There are times in life where a person has to make certain choices that could be interoperated both ways. In this paper, I will be analyzing different characters in the story “The Good Women of Suzutan” and what type of role each personality plays within the story in order to give the audience a chance to come up with their own ending.

We are not inborn with the leadership trait. The function of leadership is to make the business a success. It is not the exclusively the playing field of senior managers. Managers and employees alike are required to be the bridge between the customer and the vision of Wells Fargo. Leadership is the act of sharing and communicating a vision of the future and the motivation of others to believe in, and align with that vision. Leaders are accountable for failures as well as manager. They give others the opportunity to be responsible. A first-rate leader will inspire a group to be

This paper is a critical analysis of the article “Spirituality as a Predictive Factor for Signing an Organ Donor Card”. The research was preformed by Anat Peles Bortz, RN, PhD, Tamar Ashkenazi, RN,PhD, and Semyon Melnikov, RN, PhD. The research was accepted for publication in 2014. The research was presented at the 25th International Nursing Research Congress Symposium in 2014 in Hong Kong. The research appears in Sigma Theta Tau International, Journal of Nursing Scholarship 2015. The research looked at two groups of people in Israel, those who signed an organ donor card

One way to establish the difference between management and leadership is the fact that leadership is simply one of the many things that a manager should have. In fact, this should be one of the priorities of a manager. But aside from this, a manager also needs to be highly knowledgeable in administrative tasks, because this also comprises a huge part of their job. Specifically, a manager has four major functions to do: Planning, organizing, leading, and controlling. All these functions have been proven to be essential in any kind of management process, and serve as the main foundation of all organizations (Bateman & Snell, 2009).

Roles of leadership produces change among the movement, establishes direction, aligning people, motivating and inspiring. The roles of both leadership and management have impact on each other and can inspire and make one advance into something they did not believe they have in themselves. Functions of management are making sure employee’s time is managed, jobs assigned are structured, and problems are solved with a prominent solution. Leadership functions are providing a vision one can build up in one’s mind that evolves into a big picture, building goals and teams to brooding ideas, and motivating people that energize them to be motivated to want to work. These roles are similar because leaders can manage and visa verse. Leaders lead people while management delegates roles to lower

The leaders take a focus that is more external, whereas, the focus of managers is more internal. Leaders have particular set competencies that are more forward thinking than managers. Leaders set a direction for organization. They motivate their employees, so that the business continues to exist and hopefully thrive in periods of change. Leaders keep the entity on course and to maneuver around obstacles that come in its way; for example, a captain commanding his ship at sea, whereas managers tend to the business at hand and make sure the staff is following proper procedures.

Leaders are innovators with creativity to invent and focus on vision. Leaders concentrate on the future while managers think about short-term goals and focus on what needs to be dealt with now with no intention of thinking about the future. Managers are administrators of facts, figures, and statistics rather than planning for what lies ahead. Managers are generally preoccupied with maintenance issues and dealing with solving problems while leaders find problems.

Understanding the difference and similarities between managers and leaders can be enlightening. Managers develop and manage plans that impact the strategic vision of an organization while leaders set strategic visions for the organization. Managers establish plans, support strategic plans, and organizational objectives. Managers also evaluate and track the achievement of tactical plans that have been assigned to specific staff. While on the other hand leaders motivate staff to achieve the object and task set forth. Managers serve as problem solvers. Managers are the people who assign resources to groups. On the hand leaders serve as persuasive change agents.

There are varying interpretations of the differences between leaders and managers. Many people say that they are quite similar while other say they are not even in the same league. The latter definition is quite accurate according to Marlene Caroselli’s Leadership Skills for Managers. Mangers are known as people who direct workflow and manager what people do and when they do it. As liaisons between employees and upper management, their responsibilities do not end with just what work is done. They are responsible to employees and “wear many different hats” (Caroselli, p. 2, 2000). Leaders on the other hand are different breed of people. The basic definition of a true leader is someone who motivates his or her subordinates to do something

Kotter (1990) believes that managers and leaders differ in the following ways. Managers are primarily focused on planning, budgeting, organising and controlling, with an additional input into staffing issues and problem solving. Whereas leaders concern themselves on providing direction, aligning people and motivation with specific attention to sharing the vision and commitment required to inspire and energise his team. The following statements provide a further insight into the differences between management and leadership. Leadership is “the capacity to translate intentions to reality and sustain it” (Bennis and Nanus, 1985: 17). Leadership is “the process of influencing

The leaders do not always have a hierarchical position, they appear at all levels of the organisation. Management plans and investigates how to control situations while leaders create motivation around him and give support.

Managers and leaders are often viewed by many as the same. However, there are differences between what a manager does and what a leader does. “A manager must deal with planning, organizing, and controlling” (Satterlee, 2013, p. 5). Leadership on the other hand differs greatly from Managing. “Leadership is also the ability to influence others and is dependent upon whether the leaders possesses that which followers seek”

The art of leadership is multifaceted, with areas for continued opportunity and improvement. A strong and effective leader possess a well-rounded set of skills and characteristics that allow for the group being led to be powerful followers. This is essential in order to have both leader and followers focused on a purpose and vision. Regardless of the type of organization, leadership is a necessity in a professional practice. Depending on the type of leadership, the organization can flourish or flounder. If a strong and effective leader is in charge with a clear vision in place, the organization is more likely to excel. On the contrary, with ineffective leadership in place, it creates a sense of chaos, offering minimal

Leadership and management must go hand in hand. They are not the same thing. But they are necessarily linked, and complementary. Any effort to separate the two is likely to cause more problems than it solves. A manager’s role characterize a more controlled, structured, rule oriented, analytical and orderly sequenced. Whereas, the role of a leader indicates a more visionary, experimental, impassioned, unstructured and flexible side. Thus, it can be said that leaders and managers are totally different as they behave the opposite externally and also think the opposite internally. The difference is also witness in the way the two, treat people and the way they spontaneously react to issues concerning their organizations. This can be explained by the difference in the way of work and organization between the leaders and the managers in relation to their importance in the organizations they head thus the worthiness of their time. This results to those below them to develop different focuses and also limits them in totally different ways. Such differences lead to varied cultures on the organizations and different reactions from the ones being led. Small business will operate more efficiently with managers who also serve as leaders .Workers need their managers not just to assign tasks but to define purpose. Managers must organize workers, to nurture skills, develop the talents of workers