After taking the Personality Assessment: Jung’s Typology test, I got my result was introversion, intuition, thinking and judging. Although I got this satisfied result, actually I think I may not perfect as the result showed. However, this test improves my confident to figure out the coming project, because I believe I like thinking and make the project better. This test also told me that I am an introversion and intuition person. I agree with it, but I don't think it is a bad thing for people having introversion personality, because I believe whatever you are the extroversion one or introversion; you would have your own advantage. According to our textbook, “ Learn to control your frustration to help you keep different personality types focused
Within the Jung Typology Test (JTT) it states that my type of personality is introverted, sensing, feeling and judging. The results indicated I am an introvert over extrovert, the score showed 56%. There was a marginal or no preference to sensing over intuition at 1% for this result. Moderate preference to feeling over thinking at 25%, and a strong preference to judging over perceiving at 78%. So this is saying that I am an introverted sensing with extroverted feeling.
The Jung Personality Test, was a test, trying to figure out about what kind of person I am. The test had many different questions it was asking and I would answer them truthfully. Through this test, I learned I was extroverted, sensitive, a thinker/feeler and perceiving.
Before taking these personality tests, I thought about what my personality is like, and I considered myself to be a shy and kind person who is open to new chances and ideas. The Humanmetrics Jung Typology Test revealed to me that my type is 16% Extravert, 19% iNtuitive, 16% Feeling, and 3% Perceiving (ENFP). This tells me that I’m the type of person that is more concerned about being around other people and less concerned about my own interests. Then, it also states that I make my choices based on what I am feeling and that I trust my subconscious, or that “gut feeling,” more deeply than my senses. Lastly, the test also mentioned that I can be both structured and flexible at the same time. This test informed me that my personality is rather clumsy. I tend to, “go with the flow,” and it’s not always certain what my outcome will be which may not constantly be a good thing, but I also recognize that it means I’m open minded.
This assignment assured some parts of my personality that I already knew. But, it also taught me new things about me. The Jung Typology test gave as a result that my type of person is ISTJ; 47% introvert, 1% sensing, 34% thinking and 9% judging. I actually agree with these results because it accurately reflects my type of personality. I am a quiet person that does not often socialize since I feel very comfortable when I’m surrounded by my family and close friends. In addition, my personality tends to be very rational and neutral and most of my decisions are normally ruled by what is logical and not based on emotions. Therefore, a lot of people see me as a cold person. The last component which is judging also resembles a lot on me since I believe that we as humans don’t know what the other people have to go through in their daily lives.
I was very happy to have been given the opportunity to take these self-assessment tests. I always had an idea as far as what my personality is defined as, but it’s interesting to see where my strengths and weaknesses are. With the Jungian Typology test I scored 59% Introvert, 34% Sensing, 19% Thinking, and 31% Judging. After receiving this score and reading how each is defined, none of this surprised me. Sharing the results with my mother, her response was, “No surprise there!” I have always tried having some understanding of my personality in hopes of finding the right career path for me. I must admit that this has opened my eyes to how detail oriented and focused I can be, especially if it’s something I care about. This can be both good
The results of my DISC Assessment test were extremely interesting, and in my opinion, quite accurate as well. My results showed that I am very decisive and interactive, then I am moderately stable, but not very cautious, systematic, or much of a perfectionist. These results also tied in fairly closely with my Jung Typology personality test results, which I will explain throughout the latter portion of my paper. My DISC results also ranked my seven dimensions of value and motivation. Not surprisingly for me, “altruistic” was my highest value, sitting at 93 out of 100. This is because I have a very high sincerity and genuine interest in helping others. As well as I am a giving person who desires to provide an environment in which there is opportunity
The DISC assessment, similar to the Jung-Typology, I felt was not as accurate and I
According to the results, my score for the behavior in the JUNG Typology Test is ISTJ which stands for Introversion, Sensing, Thinking, Judgement. The reasons that this is a satisfaction for me is because ISTJs we are often called inspectors. It clearly describes my personality for the sense of right and wrong, especially in the area of interest and/or responsibility (Perceiving with five senses). I am noted for devotion to duty and punctuality is a watchword of the ISTJ. Another behavior to use on the daily basis is that I like to use the highest efficiency when employing a step-by-step approach (Attending to step by step experience). For example, I like to carry a project through, even at the expense of mine own health.
After taking the Jung Typology Test, and receiving my results, I found that my results didn’t reflect anything overwhelmingly surprising about me. For the most part, I had anticipated these results.
The Jung Typology Test provided information that was, for the most part, expected.These results do seem to be an accurate depiction of my personality. This said, my belief is that the results could change depending on who I associate with at the time. This is perhaps the reason why the percentages are fairly low on the final report.
Introvert(11%) iNtuitive(62%) Thinking(62%) Judging(33%) You have slight preference of Introversion over Extraversion (11%) You have distinct preference of Intuition over Sensing (62%) You have distinct preference of Thinking over Feeling (62%) You have moderate preference of Judging over Perceiving (33%) INTJ Description
After finishing Carl Jung’s and Isabel Briggs Myers’ typology personality test, I found out that my personality type is Introverted Intuition with Extraverted Feeling (INFJ). INFJ, also known as the Protector, are gentle, caring, complex and highly intuitive individuals. After reading about my personality type, I found that I agree with most of the following results. I have taken a few personality tests in the past and all of them have resulted in similar answers. Thus, when I read through my results I was not surprised by most of the answers. On the other hand, while I was reading through the results, I was surprised by INFJ being a rare personality type and only one percent of the population have it. Another instance where I was surprised
leadership style it is easier to define it by establishing your individual leadership traits. There are
Introversion was defined as “withdrawn and often shy, and they tend to focus on themselves, on their own thoughts and feelings” (Jung, 1923) Therefore focusing on this personality trait can help to better understand why people tend to be reserved and withdrawn from everyday life. Carl Jung was the creator of the neopsychoanalytical approach, which focused on psychic energy. While Gordon Allport and Hans Eysenck contributor to the trait theory, focused on biology and individualized traits. Jung, Eysenck and Allport focused on extrovert vs. introvert, yet had completely different ideas of how introversion is seen in everyday life. Personally believeing this trait is one I carry, focusing on completely different approaches will bring light to many explanations of why people act the way they do, including myself. By using both case studies and personal work from the works of Jung, Eysenck, and Allport researching introversion should not be a an issue. Although there is a lot of work to do with introversion, through this research one can get a better overview.
In the 1920’s, a Swiss psychologist named Carl Jung devised a theory. Jung didn’t accept the idea that the behaviors of people were random. Instead, he was a firm believer that the differences between individuals were a result of how people use their brains. Jung claimed that “what appears to be random behavior is actually the result of differences in the way people prefer to use their mental capacities.” (The Myers & Briggs Foundation). Jung realized that people typically function in one of two ways, take in information or make decisions, and that people usually are more comfortable alone or around others. With all these observations, Jung wrote a book titled Psychological Types, which introduced the idea of personality and psychological