Public Transportation in Ho Chi Minh City

In general, everyone needs to go to places everyday whether it is work, visiting a family member, or just touring around interesting places. In order to go to these places, a person needs money. Public transportation costs a lot. Some people won’t be able

Transportation in the region has a long and successful past. However, public transportation has consistently taken a back seat to the personal automobile. There has been a strong core of persons who rely on public transportation to achieve mobility, and governmental

Moreover, public transportation is mainly common in means of transportation in and out of NYC due to the convenience, cost, and efficiency of public transportation. It has become more easily accessible due to having subways in nearly every other block,which is cheaper and faster. Public transportation is faster than driving into the city at times since it escapes the traffic on roads since it is underneath. Public transportation contains buses,trains,and light rails as well. Once again, automobile and the city of tomorrow can coexist, but it is not ideal in today’s

From here on, I am going to illustrate my lifestyle in a rural area versus a well developed city. I came from a small village in China. Walking to places has been build on me since I was a little kid; it was one of my habit. Back in the days, nothing seems handy to own. I remembered it was indeed hard to own a small motorcycle, not to speak of cars. On account of that, I treasure walking gratefully. I can walk to my school, relative's house, convenient stores, as well as markets for food. That has been my lifestyle for ten years until I came to the United States. My lifestyle has changed from walking to commuting through buses. San Francisco is a fairly developed city. We can access to every part of SF through muni, and the buses come in very often. Gradually, I start taking the bus to school, to hangouts with friends, and restaurants. I don’t remember when but I started to feel and think buses are so convenient. I rely on buses so much that I became surprisingly lazy. I would choose to take the bus even when the destination is

Bus lines were less expensive to build and operate than rails and trolleys. Therefore, extending service to rapidly growing suburbs could be accomplished quickly and inexpensively, since there was no need to construct additional rail lines (Slater). Slater also notes the development of the modern bus. Unlike the streetcar, which made no significant technical advances during the 1920s, the bus made substantial improvements in speed, handling, and comfort, which attracted new ridership (Slater). One of the biggest expenses for public transportation is operator labor, so vehicle speed is critical. Buses were 50% faster, meaning that the cost per passenger of the operator’s time was one-third less

When someone takes the public transit they usually have to walk from place to place to get to where they need to go. In the article, “Healthy alternative: Take mass transit” by Larry Copeland, he reveals that for every thirty minutes someone is in the car it becomes a 3 percent greater chance of obesity. He also mentions that for every kilometer walked everyday brings a 4.8 percent reduction to that chance. Copeland mentions the Los Angeles “Metro Fit” how it encourages people to exercise more by taking the transit, using the subway, exploring the local attractions, and riding bikes. In my experience, I have to walk to and from the train station every day taking me about twenty-two minutes to walk.

Additionally, the Australian government should also take steps to avoid the usage of personal vehicles by the people. The subsidies on personal vehicles should be stopped on an immediate basis to encourage the people to use public transport (Hodge et al., 2008). As a result of this, the people are more likely to walk from one place to another through the public transport vehicle instead of sitting in their vehicle from home with no scope of physical work (Randolph and Viswanath,

Though there are alternate means of transportation such as carpools, buses, or simply walking, these alternatives can be just as problematic as cars themselves. With carpools, we still run the risk of drivers that are not paying full attention to the road because they are paying more attention to the members of their carpool. Though with the intent of conserving gas, carpools will still pollute our fresh air with the harsh chemicals found in gas. Buses are more or less a large- scale carpool. Buses may seem to promote mass transportation of people, they are very costly because drivers must be paid and money must be spent on gas. Not to mention that buses can be extremely dirty, whereas the pods are self sanitized.

Also, the system will add in jobs so more people will begin to work in side of the county, growing its economy. Consider a small family: two children, their parent, and a grandparent. This family only has one car. Between work, school, and doctor’s appointments, the parent of this household is constantly stressed just worrying about getting everyone where they need to be while also getting to work on time every day. Then, what if the parent has a blue collar job, (common in Twiggs County), they may not make enough money to afford to skip work for doctor’s appointments. Thus, the grandparents and the kids have to forgo their healthcare because the parents does not have the time. By including a public transportation system, even if just to the local hospitals, everyone is guaranteed a way to the doctor’s office without the parent missing work. This decreases the mental distress of the parent and increases the physical inactivity of the

Have you ever considered taking the buses, not the car, to your destination? According to his essay “The Bus, a Modern Panacea,” Lester Detroit states that the VTA system offers a fundamental solution for not only the SJSU student but includes most people who commutes to school or work. He claims that cars have the negative side effects for the environment problems; furthermore, cars are the problem of both traffic congestion and wasting time and money. He insists that students should “drop their car culture and create a new bus culture.” Bus is the “cure-all solution” for students. As for students, I strongly disagree with Detroit’s point of view that VTA system is a suitable transportation for students to commute. It is important for students to realize that not a lot of people know how to transit, taking the bus is inconvenient, safety concern, and pollution.

Throughout the history of society of the past centuries, transportation was an important role in everyday life. These technologies evolved over time as one important one changed the way we live. Trains changed the way we got around, it changed the economic landscape of America, as well as every aspect in society and culture. This tremendous tool still helps millions of people to this day. In the United States, the present day train is cheaper than flying. Most railway services offer discounts as it provides low costs for the average American, and the prices are stable with no change, as there is no need to look at if the trends of prices do change. The train is relaxing, as you never need to be in a cram packed airplane seat. It is ecstatic to be on one of the least stressful

These kind of negative consequences can lead to positive pro-environmental behavior in regards to raising gas prices, building alternate routes around town, keeping sidewalks clean for individuals to walk on, and putting in bike lanes. By raising gas prices individuals do not travel as much so less traffic congestion and pollution, adding alternate routes around the town can help break up the flow of traffic, and adding bicycle lanes, and keeping sidewalks clean will help encourage individuals who live in town to ride bicycles, and walk. Positive consequences of traffic is that it encourages motorist to re-time their road trip to when the traffic is not as congested, and also by reducing speeds can cause less road accidents.

Public transportation is serious need of a massive overhaul in this nation. We are in desperate need to catch up to the European standard of public transportation in this country. In Europe, citizens can travel across cities, bodies of water, and even counties with their state of the art public transportation system. Europeans are not nearly as reliant on cars and oil as the United States is because they have the much more practical option of taking the transportation provided to them by the government to where ever they need to go. They have set a model that the United States needs to strive for and meet in the near future.

Public transportation can help reduce stress caused by driving, save money, and also protect our environment by reducing the number of vehicles on the road. In order to get more people off the road and into the public transportation system we must increase the number of buses and taxis that are available. We must also increase the number of stops available for daily bus routes. With more stops on the map more people are likely to use the bus system. Each city or town will be able to decide where more bus stops are needed and make the adjustments necessary to provide better service for the taxpaying citizens. Of course, none of this is possible without adequate funds in each town/city and the gas tax is guaranteed to provide those funds. Providing more public transportation will help us reach our ultimate goal of protecting the environment and ourselves.

With an increase in urbanization, more people are moving to the industrial cities in pursuit of alternative lifestyle and jobs. Life in city and suburbs can be compared and contrasted with various aspects in mind since they share quite some details in as much as they are vastly different. Firstly, the transportation is more accessible in the city as compared to the suburb where there are no apt transport networks as compared to the city, among the transport mode in the city are subways, busses, trams and ferries. These provide easy, fast and cheap means of getting around in the city in as much as the streets are crowded. This is in contrast to the suburbs since owning a car is mandatory since such public transport systems are not available. When the costs of insurance, fuel expenses and time of commuting are added up then transport in suburbs is seen to be expensive when compared to that in the city. The easy transport in the city does not come all rosy since the city is also flooded with traffic jams due to congestion and this can render transport slow. This is contrast with suburb life where there is no traffic and hence with no congestion traveling in suburbs is more peaceful (Boulter, 2005).