Qualitative research method involves analysis on ‘quality’ of study object. Specifically, it adopts such approaches as induction and deduction, analysis and synthesis, as well as abstraction and generalization to process all kinds of materials obtained in order to eliminate all but the essential, discard the false and retain the true and proceed from the exterior to the Interior, thus reveal the essence along with inherent law. Qualitative analysis is majorly about the problem of “existence” and “trustworthiness”, which can be divided into three procedures: 1. analysis and synthesis; 2. Comparison; 3. abstraction and generalization. Quantitative research concerns about numerical features, relationship and variation of social phenomena. It plays a part in revealing and describing of their interaction and development trends, collecting first-hand data through participant observation and in depth interview. There has a video which interviewing the Britons about the immigration problems. It shows that around 74 percent of Britons think one should be born in Britain to be regarded as British. Such method not only shows us the attitude, action and reason of Britons towards immigration, but also assists researchers to apprehend the problem thoroughly. A great defect, however, exposes itself that researchers must be separate from the research completely to avoid bias and misleading of conclusions.
Quantitative research applies mathematical language. Qualitative and qualitative
In her book, Salsa Dancing into Social Science, Luker discuss the importance of sampling, operationalization and generalization in canonical social science research while highlight the believe that each of these ideas can also be applied to qualitative research. While all three concepts are important to consider when it comes of qualitative research. It is import to definite that similar and differences. The following gives an overview of how each competent uses within canonical social science research, how that translates into effect qualities and explore the ways in which Hochschild utilizes these methods in her research for Strangers in Their own Land
This paper primarily concerns qualitative research, but we were asked to compare both qualitative and quantitative methods. During comparison, there are many noted differences in both study designs, but not many similarities. Qualitative research uses a subjective approach with a large sample population. It collects non-statistical data, using an unstructured or semi-structured technique (Nieswiadomy & Bailey, 2018). Quantitative research uses an objective approach and large, random, sampling to ask opinions in a structured way. The findings of quantitative studies are conclusive and used to recommend a final course of action (Nieswiadomy & Bailey, 2018). While it is hard to see similarities between the two, both methods aim to find a solution to a problem or question, the researcher doing the study may affect the outcome and an analysis of the collected data must be done (Souza, 2017). What many don’t realize is the connection amongst the two. You can say, both types of research build upon one another, meaning quantitative studies can quantify results found in qualitative research (Souza, 2017).
Qualitative research is subjective data and is often used in the social sciences (Sarantakos 2013, p. 48). Qualitative research is devoted to gathering facts, this can be completed through personal experiences, behaviours, and observations (Sarantakos 2013, p. 46). The purpose of qualitative research is to gather an in depth understanding of human behaviour and the explanations for the behaviour (Martijn & Sharpe 2006, p. 1). An issue with only using a qualitative method is efficacy, qualitative studies cannot address relationships between variables with the degree of accuracy that is required to establish social trends (Sarantakos 2013, p. 46).
Both qualitative and quantitative research methodology will be use to investigate the hypothesis. The use of case study, questionnaire, interview and statistical analysis will be used to observe and asks questions about the views of the micro, meso and macro levels of society on my topic. Problems that could occur with these methodology is not having enough adequate data to proceed the with each analysis. Secondary research will be used to make subjective judgments about what data is useful and what is not for the motive for the research process.
Compare and contrast quantitative and qualitative methods on each of the elements listed. Please use scholarly, academic literature to support your response.
According to Schneider, Elliot, LoBiondo-Wood & Haber (2004), qualitative research methods, search for the meaning and understanding of human experiences in a naturalistic setting. A researcher obtains subjective facts in order to explore the experiences of each participant (Schneider, Elliot, LoBiondo-Wood & Haber 2004). As a result, qualitative research is a means in which a researcher gains an insight into the participant's point of view concerning their personal experiences; in order gain an understanding of the information given. Therefore this allows a researcher to collect subjective information to create a description of the phenomenon (Vishnevsky & Beanlands 2004).
Qualitative data is not numerical and is more likely to take the form of observations or interviews. Obviously, it is very difficult to perform any statistical analysis on this kind of data. A further problem is that another researcher cannot replicate this data and therefore it is difficult to check the validity of what has been written. Researchers using this kind of data must be careful to avoid subjectivity, that is, they must avoid letting their personal beliefs or preferences affect the way they record and interpret the data. The advantage of this form of data collection is that it allows the researcher to answer open-ended questions; consequently, it is more flexible. Qualitative data also provides opportunities to explain the context of an observation and can therefore present a fuller picture (OU, 2001).
In the following question which is about to explain why scientific methodology is crucial to psychology, I am going to consider what psychology exactly is and why is crucial scientific methodology to this process.
The Methodology that will be used in terms of the research question will be the qualitative research which involves a phenomenological perspective. The researcher aims to evaluate the meaning of events for people in particular situations, the characteristic of qualitative research are as follows.
The purpose of this qualitative/descriptive study was to find out “...the self-reported educational experiences and aspirations of youth in the foster care system, and...the charcteristics of youth in the foster care system...associated with educational experiences and aspirations (Auslander, Elze, McMillen, et. al., 2003 476).” In short, the purpose was to determine the effect of different fostercare programs on the professional/educational aspirations of youth. It was conducted among 262 teenagers living in independent living preparation programs in a midwest US county (476).===================
Immigration refers to the movement of people that from one country to another goal country which they are not native for the purpose of settle or reside there and the elements are related to society, economic, politic and environment. On the positive hand, immigration expands the human living space and the increase of human civilization. To the nation of immigrants, the immigration brings the technical labour and cultural collision. Meanwhile, it could improve the development of economy and conurbations. On the negative hand, it adds the risk of racial and social class conflict, which would lead to the violence and social exclusion. For investigating the problems and benefits of immigration, we should use different research approach, as qualitative research, quantitative research and document based research, to be a clear and comprehensive research. This essay will focus on evaluate which research approach is best for studying the attitude of British citizen to people who moved to the United Kingdom.
Qualitative analysis refers to not the quantifying of qualitative data, but a nonmathematical process of interpretation, pursuing discovering concepts and relationships in raw data including interviews, observations, documents, visual footage and even quantitative data from elsewhere, and then have them organised into a theoretical explanatory scheme (Strauss & Corbin, 1990). It is more capable than conventional methods to obtain intricate details about a phenomenon (Strauss & Corbin, 1990).
This proposed research work was a qualitative research in its very nature of data collection and analysis. It has covered the empirical type of research methodology as for data collection the researcher had to visit the spot and talk to the stakeholders directly. Besides, from the point of authenticity and nature of data collection it can be categorized as the ethnographic research, as well.
In this chapter, the research methods commonly employed in social sciences, namely, qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods will first be discussed. I shall then describe my own research design, including the philosophical approach I adopted. This approach will be explained by identifying the ontological and epistemological standpoints assumed. The research strategy will be clarified, and the sampling procedures and participants of the study will be described. The processes of data collection will be explained. There is then a discussion of issues of validity and reliability, and confidentiality and ethics, and finally the procedures of data analysis used for this study will be explained.
Qualitative research methods are utilized to study the social and cultural phenomena. So it includes observation, participant observation (field work), interview sessions, documents and texts and finally the researcher’s imitations and feedback. [Myers, 2009]