Vroom’s expectancy theory
Expectancy Theory or "VIE Theory" is based on the premise that motivation happens when three particular conditions are fulfilled: effort, performance, and outcome. Think of motivation as a chain where every connection represents to a condition, and the intersection of every connection represent its components: expectancy, instrumentality, and valence. Within the chain, a man expects their effort will bring about some level of performance (expectancy). The perceived or expected result of their performance level will be considered instrumental to the result (instrumentality). Lastly, a man will put subjective esteem on their conviction about the result (valence). This value will determine how satisfactory the result
…show more content…
Much like many of the more prevalent theories of motivation, for example, Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs and Herzberg's Two-Factor Theory; Adams' Equity Theory recognizes that delicate and variable factors affect an employee's appraisal and impression of their relationship with their work and their manager.
John Stacey Adams, who developed his job motivation theory in 1963, Adams' Equity Theory, he is a workplace and behavioral psychologist
The theory is assembled the belief that employees get to be de-motivated, both in relation to their job and their employer, in the event they feel as though their inputs are more prominent than the outputs. Employees can be expected to respond to this is different ways, including de-motivation, decreased work, getting to be disappointed, or, in more extreme cases, maybe even troublesome.
Apply of the Adams' Equity Theory
It is important to consider the Adams' Equity Theory factors when trying to enhance an employee's job satisfaction, motivation level, and so on, and what should be done to promote higher levels of each.
To do this, consider the stability or instability that exists at present between the employee's inputs and outputs, as follows:
Inputs include:
Effort.
Loyalty.
Skill.
Ability.
Flexibility.
The Equity Theory touches on the effects these situations have on the employee’s motivational level. In society today employees are constantly comparing how they are
This can also relate to the process theories such as the expectancy and equity theories. The expectancy theory (Appendix c) predicts that individuals will be motivated if they value the reward given for work and believe this is a just reward. By working hard and professionally they can achieve promotion and so become motivated. The basis of the equity theory is related to one’s perception of job input and outcomes and those of their colleagues (Appendix d). Employees in Primark who have high input and outcomes can see these outcomes through the opportunity of promotion. However such fairness does not always arise in Primark.
Maslow’s Hierarchy of needs was introduced in the mid-1940’s by Abraham Maslow; it is one of the most popular theories of work motivation to this day. the theory was originally used specifically in a psychological setting, but was made more popular by Douglas McGregor in the late 1960’s and began to be used by not only psychologists but managers as well (Steers & Porter, 1983). The hierarchy is based on the fact that human beings have needs, Maslow took these needs and separated them into five categories: physiological needs, safety, belongingness or social needs,
The theories relating to the motivational methods and techniques I have chosen to reinforce the information are the two-factor and expectancy theory. The two-factor theory was developed by Frederick Herzberg’s and falls under two categories the satisfier and hygiene factors. The two are linked and are identified as being turned
Adam’s Equity Theory is a model of motivation which basically states that employees will perform at a more productive rate if they feel that they are being treated fairly (Kreitner & Kinicki, 2010). Equity is achieved when a worker perceives their reward for their amount of work to be equal to that of a relevant worker. Negative inequity is perceived by the employee when the relevant worker receives greater rewards for the same amount of work. Positive inequity is perceived by the employee when the relevant worker receives fewer rewards for the same amount of work (Kreitner & Kinicki, 2010).
The Expectancy Theory of Motivation (hereafter “The Expectancy Theory”) is theory that states: “the strength of a tendency to act in a certain way depends on the strength of an expectation that the act will be followed by a given outcome and on the attractiveness of that outcome to the individual.” (Robbins & Judge, 2012) The theory is among the most widely accepted theories relating to motivation. (QuickMBA, 1999-2010)
Adams was a workplace and behavior psychologist who pushed the ideas of the Equity Theory onto employees. Equity Theory works to explain the importance of keeping equity between the contributions that an employee brings to a job and the benefits that the employee receives. According to www.MindTools.com, “Much like many of the more prevalent theories of motivation (such as Maslow 's Hierarchy of Needs and Herzberg 's Two-Factor Theory), Adams ' Equity Theory acknowledges that subtle and variable factors affect an employee 's assessment and perception of their relationship with their work and their employer.” Adams’ findings also point out that employees will take into consideration how others are being rewarded in the workplace and then compare it to their own rewards. If things do not feel equal for an employee, motivation is very likely to dwindle for the employee in spite of the unfairness.
The success of any business depends on the productivity and satisfaction of its employees. Employees need to be motivated to work. Motivation can be defined as the inner force that drives individuals to accomplish personal and organizational goals. Motivation can be either intrinsic or extrinsic. For an individual to be motivated in a work situation there must be a need, which the individual would have to perceive a possibility of satisfying through some reward. Intrinsic motivation stems from motivations that are inherent and arise from performing the task of the job itself, which the individual gets a feeling of either positive or negative motivation as a result of
approach (Armstrong, 2003, pp. 217-230). According to both of these theories ‘people only work for
Motivation in the workplace is one of the major concerns that managers face when trying to encourage their employees to work harder and do what is expected of them on a day-to-day basis. According to Organizational Behavior by John R. Schermerhorn, James G. Hunt and Richard N. Osborn the definition of motivation is "the individual forces that account for the direction, level, and persistence of a person's effort expended at work." They go on to say that "motivation is a key concern in firms across the globe." Through the years there have been several theories as to what motivates employees to do their best at work. In order to better understand these theories we will apply them to a fictitious organization that has the following
Human Resources is dependent on the success, happiness, and contentment of employees that keep the business on course. Motivation is one of the best ways to push employees forward while making sure everyone is in a comfortable position in their job. Motivational theories just attempt to explain what motivates or makes people act the way that they do. The goal of understanding these theories and their outcomes is to ensure a better performance from each employee, and to give each of those employees the best situation they can have in the workplace. Visionaries such as Abraham Maslow, Frederick Herzberg, and Henry A. Landsberger also brought forward new ways of management and ways to handle internal situations that changed the landscape of human resources as a whole. Motivational theories instituted in the workplace have a commonly positive effect on both employees and management, showing that it is important to strive for proven motivational practices.
Expectancy theory of motivation Hausser Food. Employees and organization both of them have expectation and needs. Organization have expectation to their employees through target. Employees have expectation to the organization or company through their reward if they can reach or above the target. In this point of view The employees of Florida team are feel under rewarded which although they have high E to P that have good P to O
According to Herzberg, the factors leading to job satisfaction are distinctly different from those that lead to job-dissatisfaction. Therefore, the managers who seek to eliminate factors that create job-dissatisfaction can bring about peace at the workplace but cannot motivate the employees. These factors are termed as hygiene factors comprising administration, supervision, working conditions, salary and wages etc. While absence of hygiene factors will lead to dissatisfaction, mere presence of these factors will not satisfy (i.e. motivate) the employees. In order to motivate the employees, managers must resort to ‘motivators’ (those factors that motivate the employees towards better performance) such as recognition, challenging assignment, responsibility, opportunities for growth and self-fulfillment etc.
10. McGregor’s Theory X and Theory Y • Taught psychology at MIT. • At Antioch College, McGregor found that his classroom teaching of human relations did not always work in practice. • From these experiences, his ideas evolve and lead him to recognize the influence of assumptions we make about people and our managerial style. Content Theories of Motivation McGregor‟s Theory X and Theory Y – Theory X • Assumes that workers have little ambition, dislike work, avoid responsibility, and require close supervision. – Theory Y • Assumes that workers can exercise self- direction, desire responsibility, and like to work. – Motivation is maximized by participative decision making, interesting jobs, and good group relations.
Radosevich, D. J., Levine, M. S., Sumner, K. E., Knight, M. B., Arendt, L. A., & Johnson, V. A. (2009). The role of expectancy theory in goal striving processes. Journal Of The Academy Of Business & Economics, 9(4), 186-192.