When I was five years old I began school. In Kindergarden we learned basic things like letters, numbers, and how not to be fully engulfed in flames. For some reason, 2004 was the height of anti-fire education in Missouri and before I knew how to tie my shoes I knew that if I ever was ablaze, to cover my face, fall to my knees, and roll back and fourth. This is what my institution placed serious value upon and because I was a student of that institution I also placed serious value upon it. The same idea must be applied to a university's teaching of environmental sustainability. This is discussed in David Orr's "What is Education For?" Through choosing a curriculum a university chooses what it places value onto, by making the environment a priority it showcases to the future generations that environmental wellness is an important responsibility for them to take ownership.
A university's job is create responsible adults. While they educate students on paying bills, owning a home, and living away from caretakers they must also educate students on the responsibility they have to the environment. "Whose responsibility was Chernobyl?" (Orr) Orr asks to illustrate how hard it is to assign blame to environmental issues because they problems are just so large. If everyone takes blame than everyone will strive fix troubles. "Knowledge of how to do vast and risky things has far outrun our ability to use that knowledge responsibly." (Orr) One of Einsteins biggest regrets was the push
Environmental, sustainability and social responsibility reports are always created for vast amounts of companies around the world. Adidas and Nike are huge competitors in the sports manufacturing industry. Adidas is the second largest manufacturer of sporting equipment and clothing in the world behind the American company known as Nike. Adidas’ global headquarters is located in Herzogenaurach, Germany while Nike’s headquarters is located in Beaverton, Oregon. Adidas was first founded in the year 1948 and Nike was first founded in 1964. These two
Environmentally, the University of Ottawa’s campus is constantly under construction, looking for new and greater ways to promote sustainability. A way to identify the problems around campus is by doing surveys. UOttawa’s Global Environmental Challenges Class has conducted one regarding services and programs around campus that move towards a more environmentally friendly campus. The students verbally carried out these surveys to students, professors and other staff members to acquire their level of knowledge on the subject. The data was compiled and graphed to develop the statistics in order to measure these levels. The end result was that very few students actually knew anything concerning the services and programs themselves. Specifically, the male gender had the least interest or comprehension of the subject. As a result of this, to make a difference, communication regarding the services and programs clearly needs to be elevated from a whisper to a shout if there is to be success in a greener awareness on campus.
Environmental sustainability can start with one person or a group of people. We can become more environmentally sustainable by using less water or turning off the power when we leave a room. How we do it isn’t the difficult part, it’s getting others to follow in our footsteps and join us in the movement to become more environmentally sustainable. A great place to start is a college campus. With potentially thousands of students on board, we could make a difference in our environment. The trick however is convincing students to turn off the light before they leave a room or even not using as much water to when they brush their teeth. I believe it is possible for Union University to become more environmentally sustainable with a little hard work and dedication.
Q.2 what is the relationship between sustainability and anthropogenic climate change, and how can an understanding of these linkages be used to guide policy from the global to the local scale?
Social issues within sustainability are something that needs to be constantly re-addressed and re-evaluated due to our ever-changing cultural perceptions. For example, the health and safety of workers has been an area that has been exploited throughout history in association with textiles. In western culture the industrial revolution saw the rapid growth of machinery, factories and production as a whole. The factory workers themselves where typically very poor and received extremely little wages as well as little or no thought having gone into the health and safety of those workers. Factories were perceived as noisy, cluttered and very dangerous. This brought forward a social need for proper training, supervision and a clean and controlled environment within a work place. This being said we now have in today’s modern western culture, laws and regulations that protect us and ensure we receive minimum wage for the time and effort we provide. This is reinforced by Barbour’s statement that they ‘recognise the importance and implications of health, safety, welfare… working in partnership with its own factories and all of its suppliers both in the UK and overseas to ensure that workplace standards, health and safety, fair pay and fair employment conditions are complied with.’ (Barbour Press, n.d.) However, if as a society we understand the need and solution for these particular social issues, why do many textile and fashion companies go further a field to non-European
Sustainability literature maintains that people need to be taught about sustainability, equity and biodiversity, and an early education would be most beneficial(Young & Moore, 2012). Ecological education begins with a changing of current perceptions and values (Capra, 1996). If perceptions about current world views and beliefs are challenged, a new way of thinking and of living will be free to emerge.
As you know, nowadays, different definitions exist for sustainability in a variety of academic fields and disciplines. What seems to characterize many of these definitions of sustainability is the recognition that the future is important to consider. (Holmberg,1992). Perhaps the most common and well-used definition comes from the Brundtland Commission, which defines sustainability as “development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs”. URL1
Sustainability is a topic that has become very important in recent years. Sustainability is defined as, “the ability to continue a defined behavior indefinitely.” ("Finding and Resolving the Root Causes of the Sustainability Problem", 2014)
This essay will review two significant environmental experiences I have encountered exploring the influences of these my life and how these have altered my view on what is environmental sustainability. An examination into these two experiences will follow into reviewing my perspectives on environmental sustainability and how these two experiences influenced this. To conclude a discussion on my role as a teacher and how this will impact myself when in the classroom.
Biodiversity is major component of sustainability, and it is defined as the “variety of genes, organisms, species, and ecosystems” in a given area or on the planet as a whole (Miller and Spoolman 2015, 5). Urban spaces typically lack biodiversity due to a variety of factors that cause the destruction of ecosystems, such as replacing established ecosystems with large lawns, parking lots, buildings, and highways. When these well-established, high-functioning ecosystems are disturbed, we eliminate the variety of genes, organisms, and species that lived in that ecosystem. In doing so, we have caused stress for the organisms that live there. For example, if we fragment an ecosystem via highway or road expansion, at a minimum we are permanently altering the breeding and feeding relationships that existed in that ecosystem. In terms of breeding, highway construction separates organisms of the same species and keeps them from mating. This results in fewer genes being exchanged between organisms. Those genes could potentially be what saves a species from extinction in the event of a disaster, such as a forest fire or flood. In addition, highways also disrupt energy flow patterns which provide ecosystem services like a natural form of population control. In accordance with that, the extinction of even a single species can cause a rapid decline in a variety of organisms in that same ecosystem. This is due to the fact that many organisms within an ecosystem have co-evolved, meaning
Environmental sustainability is a major cause for concern in the world today. The entire world has come to the realization of some of the dangers posed by unsafe environmental practices such as dumping of effluents into the sea and releasing smoke and dust into the atmosphere. There has been a renewed interest in handling the environmental concerns by making deliberate and collaborative efforts to address the situation (Blewitt 17). The coming into force of legal instruments such as the Basel Convention of 1989 aimed at enhancing compliance with environmental safety concerns. Despite these deliberate efforts, some states are yet to put in place remedial measures to handle the matter. The efforts made by the societies aim at making the environment more sustainable. This article examines the sustainability processes taken to control electronic waste dumping in the environment (Blewitt 56). In the process, the write-up will discuss some of the mechanisms of handling the waste and analyzing their suitability, in the ultimate determination of the most appropriate mechanisms for handling the issue. Sustainability remains the major drive in regulating the activities of the industrialists and the households that pose a danger to the environment.
A few problems we face in the world today include harmful ozone layer destruction, unmanageable global warming, disgustingly high levels of pollution, dangerously high rates of natural resource depletion, and extinction at astronomical rates. The effect of these issues includes destruction of our trees and plants, food shortages, higher risk of natural disasters, higher risk of unclean water, and a higher risk of cancer (Environmental Problems). These obvious issues have been ravaging our earth for much too long and it is time that people begin to step up and embrace environmental sustainability. While there are groups and foundations working towards creating a more sustainable earth, more active and widespread involvement is necessary. In
Sustainable development, throughout time, has evolved various forms of definitions. However, this term is used in reference to environmental, ecological, social, and economical development and in terms of the dictionary reference, the term could be used in terms of trying to uphold, or the long term effect of actions for a desired result (Naz, 2009, p.187). The dictionary definition is somewhat parallel to the definition provided in the Brundtland Report “Our Common Future” (Naz, 2009, p. 187). In this report, the definition of sustainable development was thoroughly investigated. The definition was as follows: sustainable development is fulfilling the needs in the present without compromising future
“Meeting the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs”
One of the biggest problems with the world today and has been for many years is the environment issues. It affects us as humans, and our ecosystem. It has slowly developed a result of human interference or mistreatment to the world, such as animals, and plants.