Team Personality Traits

psychological traits as required for the research question number two

The mean age of the participants was 19.3 which means our sample was very close to the average age of college students. The standard deviation between participants was .955, the minimum age was 18 years old and the maximum was 22 years old. 3 out of the 102 participants age were missing from the data. The question responses were used to find the standard deviation and mean for the Big Five personality trait score. The Big Five personality traits are extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, emotional stability, and openness to experiences. The response scales for these were from a 1 to 7, with a range of 6. The higher the response score the more the participant agreed with the statement and the lower the score less the participant

After taking the Project 2 assessment, I found that I have an agreeableness, conscientiousness, and openness to experience personality (Project 2 Assessment, 2017). At times, I can sympathize with people’s feelings. Usually, I can have a better understanding of why someone is thinking a way if I understand what they think. I am completely a conscientiousness person. I always want to do well with any task that is in from of me. Also, I am always thinking and planning things to do.

The study was conducted using the IPIP measure scales; (Extraversion, Neuroticism, Openness, Agreeableness & Conscientiousness), (Goldberg, 1999) and the Big Five Factor Model which measure the personality factors of the Big Five (Costa & McCrae, 1992). The four goals of Psychology was taken into consideration using the 25-item translated questionnaire with a 5 point Likert scale.

My scores on the Big Five Inventory assessment were high in almost every category (extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness and openness), excluding the trait of neuroticism, which I scored in the middle range.

Using the Big Five Project personality test, I assessed my personality in the aspects of openness to experience, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism. After several questions, the results were given where my lowest score was in the category of openness and the highest score was in the agreeableness category. In the openness to experience or intellect, I scored in the percentile of 20 and it was deemed that I was somewhat conventional. Scoring high in this category meant that a person is creative and original, while those who scored poorly were deemed as conventional and close minded. In the conscientiousness category, I scored in the 58th percentile and I was considered to be neither organized nor disorganized. Those

Based on the well documented finding that the personality traits of conscientiousness, agreeableness, and emotional stability evidence significant

This is the issue of Charter Schools. Charter Schools simultaneously funded by nonprofit corporations, guided, by founded research, innovative and creative, yes, fun teaching methods, positive academic rewards and fascinating field trip excursions. Successful charter schools upheld the standards of quality and created the most optimal learning environment for the emerging minds of the future.

This paper will discuss two personality tests, the Five Factor Model and the Jungian Model. It will also discuss the results I got from the Five Factor Model and the Jungian Model personality tests. I will then do an analysis of my results and a write a summary of two articles.

However, other models used to asses personality traits within teams exist such as the Team Diversity Personality (TDP), 'which is a team’s mean level on a particular personality trait or set of personality trait ' (Neumen et al., p.31), this would be useful to company X as it would help them analyse which personalities dominate most in certain teams. This model is an average and so takes into account any extreme personalities in a team, it must also be noted that while personalities are usually reoccurring sometimes personalities that are not usually displayed, may become evident in certain situations for example, a person who is usually not conscientious may become more conscientious in order to complete an important task.

According to Paul H. Appleby, the public administration is different from the private administration in three important aspects, the first is the political character, secondly the breadth of scope, impact and consideration and public accountability. These differences seem very fundamental and very valid in the light of our own exploration of the subject in previous articles. Josia Stamp went a step further and identified four aspects of the difference of which the only one similar to that of Appleby’s is that of public accountability or public responsibility as Stamp identifies it. The other three are Principle of uniformity, Principle of external financial control, and Principle of service motive. Herbert Simon cited very practical and easy

New Historicism is a modern literary theory that focuses on how events, culture, and places within a society influence a written work. New Historicists analyze allusions to characteristics of the time period in which the work was written. By definition, new historicism seeks to discover the significance in a text by taking into account the work within the construction of the established ideas and assumptions of its historical era. Literary texts are entrenched with historical context and the author is seen as subject to the forces of the culture that he or she works within. New Historicists reject the New Critical principle that texts are autonomous and should be read without any comparison to history, and instead argue that texts are

I have applied Carl Jung and Erik Erikson’s theories to my own personality. I examined myself, took a Jung typology test and interviewed family to try and gain the most accurate information to work with. I thoroughly review the concepts of both psychologists’ theories on personality. I surprising found analyzing myself very difficult, but it has proven to be a very interesting learning experience. This self-analysis has helped me identify problems with my personality and given me a drive to change them.

The Big five model displays five different personalities and the actions created from those personalities can either make a positive or negative impact in the community. The five personalities are Conscientiousness, Agreeableness, Neuroticism, Openness to Experience and Extroversion. Each of these have both positive and negative outcomes depending on the situation. Conscientiousness is “a personality dimension describing people who are careful, dependable, and self-discipline” (38). Agreeableness comes in the category of “Courteous, good-natured, empathic, and caring” (37). Neuroticism Is “a personality dimension describing people with high levels of anxiety, Hostility, depression and self-consciousness” (38). Openness to experience is a personality trait which goes to a person who is “Imaginative,creative, curious,sensitive” (37). Extroversion “characterizes people who are outgoing, talkative, sociable and assertive” (38). When doing the exercise for the big five in week 3, my answers were different than expected. My Score for Conscientiousness is 69%, which means I set goals and pursue them with determination and people regard me as reliable and hard-working. For agreeableness, my score was 71%, which shows that I have a strong interest in others’

After I completed the short form on the website provided, a report was sent shown to me.). The report estimated an individual’s level on each and every one of the five broad personality domains/models. The models are as follows: (a) Neuroticism (b) Extraversion (c) Openness (d) Agreeableness (e) Conscientiousness. The Models are also further divided into six (6) facets each. This helped in explaining the criteria used in arriving at the results of the report. The explanations of the scores from the report are written below.