The Dangers And Cons Of Animal Testing On Animals

As of 2015, 200 to 225 million animals are said to used in laboratory research for the biomedical industry annually worldwide. Typically defended by arguments of reliability and human health benefits, recently the question of ethics and values placed on animal testing have caused it to become a relevant and pressing topic that has been more widely discussed and debated. First off, the laboratory conditions that are instigated upon millions of animal models for the sake of medical research has been said to be unethical and cruel. Additionally, it has been debated that the results of animal experimentation are unreliable across a wide range of areas. Lastly, animal testing not only leads away from the direction of resources from more effective testing methods but also prolongs the duration of time humans may need to wait for an effective cure. Therefore, the potential benefits of animal experimentation are greatly outweighed by the risks and collective harm of humans and animals which is why resources should be directed towards more human-based testing procedures.

When you think of cosmetic animal testing, what images come to mind? Do pictures of burned eyes and irritated skin appear? Well, it should. The FDA (Food & Drug Administration) has given a claim stating, “The FD&C Act does not specifically require the use of animals in testing cosmetics for safety, nor does the Act subject cosmetics to FDA premarket approval” (“Product Testing - Animal Testing & Cosmetics” 1). According to this statement by the FDA, animal testing is not mandatory, so why do researchers continue to use it? It should be forbidden to use species of animals for cosmetic research and inhumane cruel experiments. Running test and experiments on innocent and voiceless animals can lead to the cause of their unnecessary deaths, have misleading research, and end up wasting (or costing) too much money.

There are so many products being tested on animals , from being lipsticks, shampoos, makeup, skin care etc. But have you ever wondered the side effects these animals experience while using these products? They will experience Burning, torturing, pain, hunger, thirst etc. How is living in a cage living? It's not it is just surviving.

Animal testing is a cruel way to try and develop new products. There are several other and much safer options that will get better results and potentially save up to two million animals every single year. The Animal Welfare Act is in place but only minimally protects certain animals and leaves many others, up to 95%, vulnerable to atrocious fates. The animals not protected by this act (mostly small or considered house pets) are most widely used and not related closely to humans. There are several alternative methods but they are being neglected since they are new and not being enforced because of it. A few countries and states have banned certain aspect of animal testing but others are encouraging this cruelty.

Although animals testing help humans in many ways it can be cruel and inhuman to the animals being tested on. Depending on which lab the end up in they could be treated poorly and starved. They could be “inflicted with burn wounds and pain to test for a healing process” (Brown, 2017). This is cruel and just wrong for many reasons. “When testing to evaluate irritation caused by

For starters, this form of study hasn’t affected any mainstream and/or “useful” animal. Animals which aren’t used in livestock or other purposes are avoided, as well as animals with short life spans being detected. In addition to this, there are laws that help prevent animals injuries, or in extreme cases death. The Health Research Act of 1895 prevents any animal cruelty, or unnecessary testing. It also prevents experiments for cosmetics, or anything else that isn’t a necessity for mankind. To top this all off, any animal that isn’t used is let free,

Many people may not realize that the majority of products in their own home have been tested on animals; from lipstick and shampoo to dish soap and foot powder. Even the white ink on an M&M has been tested on animals. To some, this statement may be alarming and even disturbing – to others it may not mean much at all. Either way, the debate over animal testing has gained much popularity in recent decades.

It is been assessed that about, twenty-eight million animals are used every year in the United States for science and profitable testing. Animal testing is used to progress in medicinal treatments, to determine the toxicity of medications, research safety of products intended for human use.(Lawrie, 2014).

Scientists say animal testing helps scientists advance in more scientific understanding, by using animals as models and mimicking the complexity of a human. This is exactly why we shouldn't use animals to mock a human. Because a human is extremely complex, the complexity and intricacy is precisely why animals are not good models for human medicine. We differ from animals genetically and metabolically, so data we obtain from animals cannot be assumed to work for humans. For example, cancer was cured for mice, but when tried on humans, it failed - because of the fact that we differ from

Many of us are unaware of the sheer number of animals that undergo constant suffering in the name of human vanity. Animal testing was originally introduced in the early 20th century and is still prominent today. It is morally unacceptable to experiment on animals for human purposes. The procedures used in animal testing are cruel and inhumane, nor are they the most reliable source of data; resulting in many mishaps. Moreover, with the perpetual advancements in technology, there are several alternative methods making animal testing unnecessary. If testing cosmetics and drugs on humans is unacceptable, what makes it acceptable to test on animals?

Testing is safer for animals than it is for humans. Animals are the closest thing to humans on our planet. Mice are 98% genetically similar to humans, and chimpanzees share 99% of their DNA with humans. Animal research has been found to put no human lives at risk. Experiments can take place to determine if the idea or product will work as expected. If it does, it can then be tested on humans with a lower risk of unfavorable outcomes.

How many animals do you think are used each year in the United States, alone for scientific and commercial animal testing? What if I told you, 26-million animals, remember just in the United States, are used yearly. Animal testing has been used for research since at least 500 B.C. Some people, such as Scientists, say it has extremely revolutionized the society that we are today, such as being able to have vaccines. If it was not for animals testing, we would not have the Hepatitis B shot. In contrast though, other people and societies, such as PETA (People for Ethical Treatment of Animals) say it is extremely cruel and inhumane to experiment on animals. In now present day, there is now an alternative way to test products and biomedical

Researchers define animal testing as an experiment where a living animal undergoes a procedure that causes them to go through pain, distress, suffering, or permanent and physical damage. In general, the experiments consist of radiation exposure, injections, inhalation of harmful gases, removal of any body parts, internal and external, and the exposure of terrifying situations that causes stress and depression for the animals (Scutti). Currently, a wide range of animals are being used for research, from farm to domestic animals. However, 90 percent of the studies use mice and rats (Quigley).

Animal testing is bad because the strain it puts on the animals. They cause dogs depression. No animal is worth my beauty. 92% of products and drugs tested on animals have adverse effects on humans, obviously it’s not working. Even with this information the use of animal testing has significantly went up from 0.3% to 4.12 million. Household products aren't ones for it but there are still some out there who use it to improve their product.

A negative effect that does not get discussed enough is the effect on the caretakers of these animals. These caretakers’ job is, as the name suggests, to take care of the animals. Similar to a bond formed between you and your pet, these caretakers get attached to their subjects. All animals have a personality and have feelings. Naturally, when someone works with these animals five days a week and watches them grow, regardless of the environment, an emotional bond is formed between the two. Yet in the same breath, these workers have to harm the very animal that these bonds are formed with. This takes a huge toll on their emotional health. Additionally, this becomes a moral dilemma. Every day, these caretakers have to consciously make a decision to support the torture and killing of innocent animals. All of this is important to take into consideration when deciding for yourself whether you should support animal cruelty or not. By supporting animal cruelty, you are supporting everything behind it including the emotional turmoil it can cause on caretakers.