CRANEFIELD COLLEGE OF PROJECT AND PROGRAMME MANAGEMENT MODULE M2 GROUP ASSIGNMENT CASE: The Trophy Project DATE: 13 March 2013 We hereby declare that this assignment is entirely our own work, and that it has not previously been submitted to any other Higher Education Institution. We also declare that all published and unpublished sources have been fully acknowledged and properly referenced. This includes figures, tables and exhibits. Where modified by us, this has also been indicated. Name | Signature | ID Number | Dorothy van Heerden | | 7003230015080 | Delareze Joubert | | 7911030059084 | George Klopper | | 6510115056089 | Morne Grobler | | 8006265241082 | Salome Cilliers | | 8502170130089 | Tammy Pieterse | | …show more content…
This is mainly due to the lack of support from top leadership, which appears to have become complacent. Aspects such as neglected authority, responsibility and accountability relationships are discussed and it is shown how it affects not only the people working on the project but also negatively affects the organisational effectiveness and design of the company and the project. The document is concluded with recommendations that the company needs to focus on its organisational effectiveness and design. It is argued that it should start changing is ways of operating and should start working in a well-planned and organised hierarchy structure. As the situation clearly indicates a company in stagnation, it is recommended that the leadership should change their approach to organisationally grow and align their strategic mission with the ever changing surrounding environment. Finally it is recommended that the Balanced Scorecard approach is be followed to help set and measure strategic objectives and targets, as it was found that the project and the company lacks proper strategy. This has to be applied to top leadership changing the organisation from a bureaucratic to learning and growth organisation, translating the vision and mission so that members of the company can make it their own. Introduction Without experience one person cannot steer a
The paper is divided into three sections, the first of which will establish a timeline of events. This project background will serve as a case study for the analysis in the following section that will be structured such that each of the previously mentioned facets will be independently analyzed and contrasted with project management principles. Finally the paper will conclude with a summary of the analysis and recommendations based on
There are four perspectives when it comes to balanced scorecard. First one is learning and growth which means how the information and knowledge are processed and turned into competitive advantage against other companies. Second is about product manufacturing and making sure that all the products are made the same without any defaults. Third one is about customer satisfaction and making sure that customers are happy with product, service and price. Fourth one is about financial performance and making sure that company’s financial data is used properly.
A balanced scorecard is a method company’s use to measure their performance. It includes objectives, strategies, and tactics. This paper will contain two strategic objectives for each of the four balanced scorecard areas (shareholder value or financial perspective, customer value perspective, process or internal perspective, and learning and growth perspective) for H & R Block. It will also have two strategies for every objective, one tactic for each strategy, and two methods to monitor and control the overall strategic plan for H&R Block.
“The balanced scorecard should translate a business unit’s mission and strategy into tangible objectives and measures. The measures represent a balance between external measures for shareholders and customers and internal measures of critical business processes, innovation and learning and growth. The measures are balance between outcome measures, the results of past efforts, and the measures that drive future performance. And the scorecard is balanced between objective, easily quantified outcome measures and subjective, somewhat judgmental, performance…”
Balanced scorecard is the traditional methods healthcare of strategy formulation for example, extensive consultation resulting in a complex detailed strategic plan. Futhermore , it needed to introduce a new approach from outside of healthcare then followed a recent merger as well as strong external influences that were impacting negatively and would continue to do so unless they developed and implemented the appropriate
The balanced scorecard includes four perspective areas focusing on financial and non-financial categories contributed to achieving the corporations’ strategic aims. The four broad categories are; financial performance, customer satisfaction, internal processes, and learning and growth (Blocher, 2013). By breaking the organization’s performance into four perspectives, organization leaders are able to quickly break down where the organization ranks measures that are most critical to success.
The effect strategic planning has on decision making and financial performance is key to your organizations success. The introduction of the balanced scorecard emphasized financial performance as one of the key indicators of a firm’s success and helped to link strategic goals to performance and provide timely, useful information to facilitate strategic and operational control decisions. This has led to the role of finance
The balanced scorecard is a strategic planning and management system is used to help align activities of the vision and strategy of the organization, and apply it to the overall
The balanced scorecard is a strategic planning and management system that was developed by Dr. Robert S. Kaplan and Dr. David P. Norton in the early 1990's. Their goal was to provide organizations with a clear understanding of what to measure in order to improve performance and results (Balanced Scorecard Institute 2014). The balanced scorecard is a framework that allows an organization to measure performance and compare it to the organization’s strategic objectives and goals (Kinney and Raiborn 2013, 10).
This paper, examination, report, or the section thereof for which I have indicated responsibility, is my own work. Any assistance I received in its preparation is acknowledged within the report or examination, in accordance with academic practice. For any data, ideas, words, diagrams, pictures, or other information from any source, quoted or not, I have cited the sources fully and completely in footnotes and bibliographical entries, as required. Furthermore, I certify that the material was prepared by me specifically for this class and has not been submitted, in whole or significant part, to any other
A scorecard has several measurement perspectives, with the original scorecard having financial, customer, internal business and innovation and learning perspectives. Balanced scorecards are normally a key output from the strategy formulation process. The key goals that are identified as being critical to the success of the business,
Balanced Scorecard is a general methodology that is being used to improve performance within strategic
The Trophy Project was fundamentally mismanaged from the start. The management functions of planning, organizing, staffing, controlling and directing personnel and resources were poorly executed by both senior and project level management. Customer expectations were not well defined and scope creep was allowed to take place without proper administration. There did not appear to be a corporate champion for this project who could mentor and resolve conflicts that were beyond the authority of the project manager. Plus, the project manager appeared to be inexperienced and was not very adept at negotiating with upper level and functional management to obtain the proper resources necessary to achieve the project
A Balanced Scorecard can be defined as a “performance management tool which began as a concept for measuring whether the smaller-scale operational activities of a company are aligned with its larger-scale objectives in terms of vision and strategy” (Wikipedia 2009, ¶ 1). Scents & Things will need to develop a balanced scorecard that will assist in meeting and help define the company’s values, mission, vision, and SWOT analysis. The balance scorecard is made up of four perspectives; financial, customer, learning and growing, and internal process. This paper will define each of the four perspectives objectives, performance measures, targets, and initiatives. The paper will also show how the perspectives relate
Although there are signs that the company has a matrix structure in place, they do not follow a programme management approach and numerous failures within the structure exist. Their approach to management is still that of a traditional organisational approach, which tends management to lack both strategic purpose and customer focus.