This study aims to evaluate the efficiency and productivity change of 39 electricity distribution companies in Iran over the period 2005–14. A nonparametric data envelopment analysis (DEA) model is used to estimate the relative technical efficiency and productivity change of these companies. In addition, the distribution of efficiency based on geographic classification, size, and the type of the company, city, or province, is assessed. A stability test is also conducted in order to verify the robustness of the proposed model. Results demonstrate that the average technical efficiency of companies increased during the years 2006–09 but decreased during 2010–14. Moreover, the low increase of productivity change is more due to low efficiency …show more content…
In addition, Iran classified its provinces into five regions. Analyzing the efficiency of distribution companies across these regions is very significant for understanding the utilization of scarce resources.
Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a mathematical programming method for assessing the comparative efficiencies of decision-making units (DMUs). This methodology is a nonparametric approach to determining a linear efficiency frontier along the most efficient utilities, to derive the relative efficiency measures of all other utilities [3]. The main advantage of DEA is that it can handle relatively easily a multi-output and multi-input environment without specifying any functional form of the production relationship [4]. DEA is attractive and most popular in estimating efficiency and productivity change in electricity distribution companies because they produce several outputs with several inputs.
The purpose of this paper is to analyze the evolution in the efficiency and productivity of Iran’s electricity distribution companies with the use of DEA. The innovative content of the paper is, for the first time, to apply DEA to these companies, and analyze them based on geographic classification, size, and the type of the companies, city, or province. In addition, a stability test is conducted and productivity changes are estimated. Finally, we hope that the results of this study can be regarded as a resource for
Efficiency refers to a business’ ability maximise output (customer service) by minimising cost of operations and time required to complete required tasks. This ratio measures total expenses as a proportion of total revenue. It decreased slightly from %99 to %98 this year but is substantially strong like other airline (singapore airline %99). One of the main startegies qantas has undertaken to be effefctive with increaseing there efficiecny would be there use of RSF (revenue seat factor) which is used as a key indicator of efficiency. It measures the percentage of total passenger capacity actually utilised by paying passengers. Other startegies include:
In 2007, Canada’s industries saved 2.1 billion U.S. dollars of energy costs (2007). All these numbers show Canada’s efforts in general public utilities.
I figured putting money towards efficiency would not only allow me to create more units, but it would also bring down the amount of wastage as to where increasing SCU would create more wastage and also make the efficiency upgrades that I would purchase less effective per dollar. This is likely because with more SCU, comes more equipment and more employees that need to be trained or upgraded with ‘efficiency updates’ in order to improve production and productivity. Therefore, less units equals less distribution of upgrades.
First, the materials efficiency variance was noted as unfavorable because 1,000 more units were used than budgeted. Since materials efficiency variances result from a variety of causes, including materials quality, spoilage, training, and equipment (Benge, n.d.). The next area to investigate are the labor variances which showed the cost, while favorable, was a difference of $1.00 per hour. Further, the efficiency was unfavorable, indicating that production required an additional 3,000 hours over budget, which could be the result of staff training, faulty equipment, or low-quality materials (Direct labor efficiency variance - explanation, formula, example, reasons. 2016). Since there appears to be a lower cost of labor than anticipated, but higher materials and hourly utilization rate, it is possible that new lower cost staff were hired resulting in slower production rates and elevated materials utilization. As such, the production manager should be consulted to investigate the cause of these variances and to put proper corrective actions into place (Miller-Nobles et al.,
For a successful business, its necessary to keep a track of how efficiently and effectively are its resources being used. Efficiency ratios help in figuring out this factor by studying the inventories, sales, trade receivables, trade payables for a year.
The first service offering is the franchised electric & gas service division of Duke Energy. A primary business function needed to produce electricity for its customers. The next area Duke Energy focuses on is renewables. Duke Energy is a leader in developing innovative wind and solar energy solutions for its customers through the United States. Their wind and solar farm are in nine states and produce approximately 17,000 megawatts of emission-free electricity (Fast Facts). The commercial power business has around 6,800 megawatts of owned non-regulated generation, primarily in Ohio and Indiana (Fast Facts). Efficient natural gas and coal-fired plants are the main sources for these megawatts. Duke Energy International (DEI) targets power generation in Latin America. DEI owns and operates approximately 4,900 megawatts of generation in Latin America (Fast
With the support of my peers and mentors, I have decided to pursue my dream of doing research in energy efficiency of utilities. I believe that with my passion and curiosity about the field, I would indeed take up much
Although financial information is not available for all competitors, the top 3 competitors show a discrepancy in production efficiency. This would lead the analysis to support the existence of other significant factors influencing the value chain outside of production. These could be the cost of supplies, distribution and marketing.
According to the case study written by Jurek, Bras, Guldberg, D’Arcy, Oh, and Biller, energy costs were steadily rising and were predicted to continue this trend going into the future. At the same time, utility companies were beginning to implement Smart Grid technologies to increase the efficiency of energy distribution. One resulting program to emerge from
Improving Efficiency - A business may also want to improve efficiency through various means in the business, which can cut down on costs, improve revenues and help the business run more smoothly.
Technical efficiency is the effectiveness with which a given set of inputs is used to produce an output. A firm is said to be technically efficient if a firm is producing the maximum output from the minimum quantity of inputs, such as labor, capital and technology (National Institute of Health, 1999).
By taking the position as Raj Bhatt, Business Development manager of GE Canada, I am comfortable and confident that energy efficiency is an attractive industry and business opportunity. What makes Raj Bhatt believe that the Energy Efficiency projects will be successful in Canada is that the project helps not only the ESCo, which conducts the performance-based contracting, but also the customers, who are more aware of the benefits of Energy Efficiency project. The Energy Efficiency project will optimize the energy usage, including conservation, use of efficient equipment and off peak usage. Even though the project has required intensive initial capital investment and long payback period, it will
Utility 2.0 is a “catch-all” term used to describe an adaptation of the traditional business model to one that accommodates and evolves to adopt new technologies to achieve a more efficient, clean, and flexible electricity system. The utility business models of the future will need to find ways to use DER, including rooftop solar, fuel cells and batteries, to improve the operational efficiency and reliability of the grid. Although some utilities are fighting this transition, many are increasingly acknowledging the need to change their business model and to update their electric grid. According to a global study conducted by PWC, 90% of utility executives agree that the utility business model need to change between now and 2030 to adapt to the changes in the industry.
Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is a non-parametric direct programming based method for assessing the relative proficiency of Decision making units (DMUs) which was presented by Charnes, Cooper, and Rhodes [16], there has been a substantial number of research on DEA models that a bunches of specialists have grown, for example, BCC show (Banker,Charnes,&Cooper,[17],FDH model[21], SBM model[22],EBM display [23], RBM demonstrate [24] and NEBM[25].As showed in [26], Wellsprings of wastefulness and efficiencies, positioning of DMUs, assessment of the adequacy of program or strategies, administrations assessment, making a quantitative reason for reallocating assets, and so on, these can be recognized by the utilization of DEA. DEA has increased significant consideration as administrative instrument for measuring the execution of DMUs and port execution in the course of the most recent decades.
He insisted that firms are not using their resources efficiently when there is an absence of strong competitive pressure (Perelman, 2011:211-22). After doing some research, Leibenstein noticed an ever recurring pattern where the factors of production were not being utilized to their full potential or they were being used in a wasteful way. These patterns did not coincide with the basic law of the neoclassical theory, as enterprises should be using their resources at optimum level and pursuing opportunities to achieve profit maximization. He also observed that the problems were not involved with markets directly but rather the activities inside the firms. The following conclusion was derived; if costs were not being minimized then one had to measure the variation between the actual and minimum costs and to do so, a name had to be found for this phenomenon, while secondly, the significance of this type of inefficiency had to be measured (Leibenstein, 1979:14). This is how the concept of X-efficiency was