Observation Report for Jones Co. Ltd 1 October - 7 October 1a) Authority is the right given to a manager to achieve the objectives or goal of the organisation. It is a right to get the things done through others. It is also the right to make decisions. It is a right to give orders to his/her subordinates and get obedience from them. A manager can never do his work without authority. A manager gets his authority from his position or post. But yet, he gets his authority from the higher authorities. The lower and middle-level managers get their authority from the top-level managers. The top-level managers get their authority from the shareholders. Authority always flows downwards. It is delegated from the top to the bottom. On the other hand, …show more content…
First and foremost, group decision making offer the synergy and sharing of information between different individual. Synergy relates to the idea that certain outcomes can only be achieved by many minds brought together to bear on a certain decision-making process. With this, decision quality is improved as more minds are included. Group decision making also will be more justifiable because the decision make up from all the group members who possess unique information, instead of a decision made unilaterally by one person. Besides that, the group decision making is more democratic in nature, while individual decision making is more autocratic in nature. The democratic processes are more easily acceptable and are consistent with the democratic ideals of our society. Apart from that, when there are many people working together, mistakes and errors that may have accidentally gone unnoticed and had serious consequences could be easily spotted by other team members. Last but not least, group decision making imbibes a strong sense of team spirit amongst the group members and helps the group to think together in terms of success as well as failure. However, there are few disadvantages of group decision making should be considered as well. Firstly, the process of group decision making is highly time consuming in terms of assembling the right group and usually a group takes more time in reaching a consensus since there …show more content…
This means that not much work is getting done and yet the workers are not provided with an environment that is motivating or rewarding. The worker are doing just enough to keep their job. (1,9) 'Country Club' This leadership style features high concern for people and low concern for production. While the work environment may be enjoyable, production suffers as a result of the lack of leadership. (5,5) 'Middle of the Road' The Status Quo This leadership style features medium production and medium concern for people. Leaders who use this style are often satisfied with average production and might even believe this is the most that can be expected. (9,1) 'Produce or Perish' The leader concentrates almost exclusively on achieving results. These leaders are autocratic, with strict work rules, and they prefer to use punishment to control their employees. (9,9) 'Team' This type of leadership style features high production and high concern for people. Team style managers ensure employees understand and contribute to the direction of the company. This is an environment where people’s needs are met and production goals are
My leadership style is about how I treat under me with respect, approachable and willing to listen with different suggestions in decision making. I want to have a cooperative teamwork, little supervision, and motivation with professionalism. There is always room for training in developing skills and expertise and encouragement to go above and beyond.
and control in the hands of the manager. In an autocratic style of management, the leader makes all of
An authoritative leader addresses the end but generally gives workers freedom to innovate, experiment and take risks. The authoritative style works best for organizations that are off track, it helps in creating a new course and fresh long-term vision. The affiliative style strives to keep employees happy to create harmony among. The style has a positive effect on communication. People who like one another a lot talk lot. They share ideas, inspirations leading to flexibility, innovation and risk taking. This style should only be employed when trying to build team harmony. The democratic style allows leaders to build consensus through participation. By spending time getting people’s ideas, a leader is able to build trust, respect and commitment. This style works best when a leader is uncertain about best direction however, it does not make sense if employees are not competent. Pacesetting is a leadership style that expects excellence and self-direction. The leader is obsessive about doing things better and faster, and expects the same of everyone around
A1. Leadership Style Upon conducting research, it is clear that the definition of “leadership” is not agreed upon. It is fluid, based upon many perceptions, situations, and surroundings. According to Robinson (2010), adopting a specific style of leadership is rather futile as it is, “contingent on the personal traits of the leader, the people being led, and the nature of the activity.” Tools are available to help guide potential leaders in determining a preferred style of leadership. For example, utilizing the “Leadership Self-Assessment
Leaders have a “the ability to influence a group toward the achievement of a vision or set of goals” (Robbins & Judge, 2007, p. 402). In the past leaders have been described by certain traits or characteristics. These traits can help an organization identify potential candidates who may be strong leaders. Later behavior approaches of leaders were identified that could be taught. In short, leaders could be made. Situations have an impact on which leader behaviors will be most effect at any given time. Several contingency theories have been formulated over the years to identify how situations influence leadership behavior. Each style has strengths and
the one that provides no guidance to the members of the team and fully let them make their own decisions. The fact that the author turned out a democratic leader was not surprising because the author believes this approach to be the most effective and focused on the members of the team rather on the leader.
I’m predisposed to this leadership theory or style because of its consideration for awareness of the element(s) of reality, that is, life experiences and some other factors, and the adaptability to each environment one finds self. This leadership theory presents itself with the understanding that organizations are different from one to another, and as a result of the differences in structures and the kinds of people that can be found around organizations; the most important leadership capability is the ability to adapt to the environment. There is no one style that fits all, but this style helps to better lead as there are times when one may need to exact authority and at some other time, one would need to show humility. Because we all come from different backgrounds, have difference life experiences and different role models, our values, preferences and priorities become shaped over the course of lifetime. Instead of trying to fit into expectations of people about what a
Based on the reading it is hard to give a single leadership style or even a combination of leadership styles because there are so many different levels of productions and management for this project. Each level of management will have their own required type of leadership and while some styles may overlap,
Situational leadership, it’s the term I use to describe the style of leadership I have developed over my career. To me this means that each individual is motivated differently and each situation may require a different approach to reach the required goal. My first Officer in Charge in the Coast Guard was BMCS Downey, his leadership style was that of stern but fair, trust must be earned, and if trust is lost it is hard to get back. The
The operations model is the traditional and most effective model of leadership. The management structure on a team of supervisors, managers, and directors working together under the leadership of a
Lastly, consensus by group decision making is not good because not everyone always builds trust within the people in their group. According to the article, "Is Consensus Decision-Making Right for your group?" Not everyone in the group has the ability to trust each other. "There is a lack or trust among group members" (consensus). A group can't come up with good ideas when there's no trust between the people in the group. If the group members don’t know each other or feel comfortable working with one another, consensus would be very
The styles today are less authoritative and more on trying to get feedback from co-workers. This change is driven by today’s individuals that want to be treated with respect and empowered to be self-driven. Today’s business environment requires managers to constantly evaluate his or her leadership style to maintain the so called competitive edge. Leadership moves through many power roles and how power vs. soft power that relates to managers as they manage people. The types of leaders are described with characteristics, as it relates to each individual. The characteristics styles that leaders show
In terms of leadership styles a wide variety exists for one to employ (Boykins, 2013). There isn’t firm consensus as to which styles prove to be the most effective. Different situations call for different approaches. In the article, Empirical Study of Leadership Styles, it discusses several leadership styles that I can relate to.
An effective leader influences their employees in a desired manner to achieve goals and objectives. Different leadership styles can affect an organization’s effectiveness and performance. The objective of this paper is to analyze the review of literature on various leadership styles over the past years and how effective and ineffective different leadership styles are in the workplace.
The last style is called laissez-faire leadership. Here leader usually participates minimally and let team members find their own way out by allowing complete freedom in decision making (Simmons and Striley, 2014).