Why Brain Default By Ferris Jabr Summary

In a world of tablets and smartphones, people tend to feel confused whether a dedicated e-reader is the right choice. E-Readers give the ability to carry thousands of books on the go saving paper and helping to make this planet greener. The big question is whether a dedicated e-reader is better than multipurpose tablets and smartphones. There are many

In Why the Brain Prefers Paper by Ferris Jabr, the author claims that reading on paper is better than reading digital or on-screen because paper increase comprehension (102), people are more focused on what they read (103), and people are emotionally connected to books (105). Jabr uses recent studies and statistics to demonstrate that reading on paper increase comprehension, compare and contrast techniques to show that the benefits of reading on paper outweigh the benefits of reading digitally because people are more focused, and pathos to show the emotional connections people have with books.

According to an article by Ferris Jabr in Scientific American, studies show that most people learn better when they read long texts on paper. This is in part because the brain works differently when the person actually thumbs through paper. Seeing where a book begins and ends helps human brains record and organize the information. Jabr writes, “Turning the pages of a paper book is like leaving one footprint after another on the trail—there’s a rhythm to it and a visible record of how far one has traveled.” Researcher Erik Wastlund has found that digital reading takes more mental energy, making brains tire more easily. A tired brain has a harder time understanding what it is reading. Thus, it is perhaps not surprising that other studies have shown that when people read short texts, they learn equally well reading on a screen or on paper.

While the first two are considerable arguments, the tactile loss argument is probably the most obvious and passionate argument longtime readers have, but the least serious technologically. I also feel that it’s getting outweighed by the convenience factor and the fact that we are reading more and more material everyday on a screen.

Furthermore, increasing iPad use is leading to a number of eye health issues that could affect your vision in years to come (“Pro”). Looking at the iPad screen for long periods of time can cause “Computer Vison Syndrome” (“Experts”). Some individuals may experience continued reduced visual abilities, such as blurred distance vision, even after they’re done on the computer/tablet (“Computer”). There have been recent evidence that iPads may cause electromagnetic interference that can disrupt a cardiac rhythm device (“IPads”). Another reason we should stick to books is that you can’t really have anything that harms you. The worst you could get would be a paper cut or getting your finger stuck under the book. Also, books can give you a more personal feeling (MacManus).

In this essay I will be the supporter of the pro’s of Tablets vs. Textbooks. Textbook have always been a big part of everyone’s life;even when ranging first grade to college level. Many parents,even students,love the feel of a textbook because it’s something not new and people are used of using on a daily basis when learning in

Please watch the video tutorial of the brain and some of it's functions. Next describe the parts of the brain from the medulla to the cortex.

Paper vs. pixel? In this case I have to go old school, I personally say paper is NOT dead. While I tend to embrace most things that technology has to offer, I have not embraced the digital text fully yet, at least for reading text. Full disclosure, I print out every single article that we need to read for this class, sit down with a highlighter and go to town. I agree with Fabr in that there is "physicality in reading." I need to hold the paper and put the highlighter on the page. When I do read on a tablet, I'm not sure I retain as deeply, as the Fabr piece contends.

The most interesting thing I found out by reading this article was the fact that people reading with both mediums scored equally on the tests. But, are there any long term effects of only reading off of tablets? Should we be stressed over partitioning our consideration in the middle of pixels and ink or is the legitimacy of such concerns slim? I believe this can be used in a practical way. They can inform and attempt to convince e-reader users to switch to paper. The only concern I have for this article is the factors that were accounted for in the experiments. I feel as if they went over a very good portion of the information. Altogether, I found this article very interesting and liked learning how the different reading mediums impact our

It slows down reading times and causes these writing stuff to suffer. This is because when information is written by hand although the test may seem to be slower, it gives the writer time to reflect on his or her thoughts about the subject differently. Moreover, scientific studies have shown that the brain receives material information differently on paper books then on screen for just computers, smartphones and tablets.

Tablets in schools come with many pros and cons but ultimately, the world is becoming more and more advanced and technological. Schools need to keep up with the changes going on in the world. Tablets are extremely imperative in schools. People may view tablets as overly expensive, however, they are actually very cost-beneficial. Tablets allow for more learning in the classrooms, give students more and easier ways to learn and access information, and help students with disabilities that struggle in the standard classroom.

Various researches have shown that the reading pattern in an environment that is digital in the last ten years has decreased attention. Peoples` literacy skills and habits have been characterized by this pattern. The time spent on electronic document has dramatically risen in the last ten years. This implies that a screen based reading behavior has come up in our societies. This is characterized by one time reading, reading selectively, spending more time browsing and then the time spent in concentrated reading is very minimal. As a matter of fact, reading on a screen can take a longer time than a person who reads a book because of distractions like hypertext links. Digital technologies can be used to improve our cognitive function though multitasking but effective learning will occur from a book because there are less

Technology in the classroom can be extremely distracting for the students. Not all the technology in the classroom is distracting but the one that has been distracting for students lately is the iPad. Elementary school children already do not have the attention span to sit in class. Technology is something the students see as fun. They take the iPad and know that there are games to play on it. In one article there was a partnership with 18 schools in Canada and students that were mostly 14 year olds were interviewed (The iPad in education: Uses, benefits, and challenges, 2013). In one of the interviews a student said that “it is hard to concentrate in class” (p. 31) because of the iPads. If iPads already make learning hard for 14 year olds,

For a person who loves to read, I could never imagine myself reading on a screen when it comes to the choice of print or digital reading. Whether it is for research, schoolwork, or just for fun, the articles I find online only encourages me to print them so that I could have a physical copy in my hands. That’s when the inseparable feeling occurs to me: I feel more of an attachment between the physical copy of the text and myself. I become so indulged in the text that my surroundings disappear. I can ultimately understand what I’m reading and grasp all the book’s pearls. Many people who enjoy reading can reminisce with the same feelings that I have experienced. Even many of those who read for the sake of completing a task can admit that there’s not much of a strain when comparing print to digital reading. This is why reading from a book is still a necessity in our daily lives: it allows for a better grasp of information, greater memory production, and an enjoyable experience that the reader can always appreciate.

One reason why the e-textbook is better than the printed textbook in class teaching is because it improves the student's learning motivation and interest. According to a survey of PBS LearningMedia in 2012, it shows that 81% of teachers in pre-K-12 feel that the tablets enrich classroom education. (Technology & Learning 12) In other words, most of the teachers believe that the tablet, a kind of e-textbook device, is playing an important role in class teaching, and it successfully creates an interactive classroom. This means that the teaching model will switch from the traditional teacher-directed into the student-centered by using the e-textbook. To sum up, this data successfully support my point that the e-textbook does benefit the student having a strong desire to learn more knowledge and being more interested in studying.