1. In the following payoff matrix, each firm has two possible strategies, and must move simultaneously. Assuming that each knows only its own payoff structure, what decision would each firm make? Is this a Nash equilibrium? Suppose each player can see the entire payoff structure instead of only its own. How would this affect Firm 2? Payoffs shown are (Firm 1, Firm 2): Firm 2 B A 3,1 2,0 Firm 1 B 2,4 1,5

1. In the following payoff matrix, each firm has two possible strategies, and must move simultaneously. Assuming that each knows only its own payoff structure, what decision would each firm make? Is this a Nash equilibrium? Suppose each player can see the entire payoff structure instead of only its own. How would this affect Firm 2? Payoffs shown are (Firm 1, Firm 2): Firm 2 B A 3,1 2,0 Firm 1 B 2,4 1,5

Exploring Economics

8th Edition

ISBN:9781544336329

Author:Robert L. Sexton

Publisher:Robert L. Sexton

Chapter15: Oligopoly And Strategic Behavior

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 17P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

1. What are the advantages and disadvantages of collusion? Define Collusion 2. In a Stackelberg game, what is the best response that follower firm 2 can make to the choice y1 already made by the leader, firm 1? Defining the game and provide an example of the best response.
on 8.1 Consider the following game: Player 1 A C D 7,6 5,8 0,0 Player 2 E 5,8 7,6 1, 1 F 0,0 1,1 4,4 a. Find the pure-strategy Nash equilibria (if any). b. Find the mixed-strategy Nash equilibrium in which each player randomizes over just the first two actions. c. Compute players' expected payoffs in the equilibria found in parts (a) and (b). d. Draw the extensive form for this game.
Consider the following game: Player 2 In Out Player 1 In -2,-2 2, 0 Out 0, 2 0, 0 (a) What is the Nash equilibrium of this game, or what are the Nash equilibriaof this game? (b) Does either firm have a dominate strategy (a strategy that is always abest response)? Which? (c) Suppose Player 1 could move before Player 2 and Player 2 could observe Player 1’s move. What do you think would happen?
Solve for the Nash equilibrium (or equilibria) in each of the following games. (a) The following two-by-two game is a little harder to solve since firm 2’spreferred strategy depends of what firm 1 does. But firm 1 has a dominantstrategy so this game has one Nash equilibrium. Firm 2 Launch Don’tFirm 1 Launch 60, -10 100, 0 Don’t 80, 30 120, 0 What is the Nash equilibrium of this simultaneous-move game? (b) What would the outcome of this game be if instead firm 1 moved first and then, after seeing what firm 1 chose, firm 2 chose it strategy? In this case firm 1 doesn’t necessarily need to choose a best response, but firm 2 must choose a best response since it moves second.
5 Suppose two players play one of the two normal-form games shown in Figure 1. L U 0,-1 D 2,4 R 2,0 6,0 L U | 4,-1 D 2,-2 R 2,0Now suppose that Player 2 knows which game is being played, but Player 1 does not. Find the pure strategy Bayesian Nash equilibrium of this game.
There are three players who must each choose an “effort” level from 1 to 7, that is, Si = {1, 2, 3, ..., 7}. The payoff for each player i is ui(si, s−i) = 10 max{s1, s2, s3} − si. How many pure- strategy Nash equilibria are there? Select one: a.2 b.4 c.none of the other answers d.3 e.1
1. What are the advantages and disadvantages of collusion ? 2. In a stackelberg game, what is the best response that follower firm 2 can make to the choice already made by the leader, firm 1 ?
Answer all questions, show all working. Consider the following game in strategic or normal form. A2 B2 C2 A1 1,0 1,2 -2,1 B1 6,2 0,3 2,3 C1 2,2 -2,1 2,3 Use the iterative elimination of strictly dominated strategies to reduce the game as much as possible. What is the set of rationalizable strategies for each player? What is/are Nash equilibrium(s) in this game? Explain the differences between cooperative and non- cooperative games. What are the fundamental hypotheses about the behavior of the persons in Game theory?