a) For each bargaining game S a solution concept o selects an alternative p(S) e S.If the solution concept selects alternative p(S) = (@,(S), q2(S)), then player 1 receivesutility o, (S) and player 2 receives utility 2(S). Suppose that a solution concept o satisfies"Property A":Property A: For bargaining games, S and T, if S C T then ø(S) < ¢1(T) andP2(S) < @2(T)Discuss Property A and prove / disprove if the Nash solution satisfies this property.b) Two players, both with zero wealth, bargain over how to divide £X > 0 between them.Failure to reach agreement means both get nothing. Both players are expected utility max-imisers. Player 1 has utility u(x) = x", where 0 < a < 1. Player 2 has utility u(x)where 0 < B < 1. Determine the Nash solution for this problem and discuss.xP,

Nash Equilibrium is a concept in game theory that finds the best solution in a non-cooperative game…

a) For each bargaining game S a solution concept p selects an alternative ø(S) e S. If the solution concept selects alternative p(S) = (@,(S), 42(S)), then player 1 receives utility o,(S) and player 2 receives utility o,(S). Suppose that a solution concept o satisfies "Property A": Property A: For bargaining games, S and T, if S CT then ,(S) < ¢,(T) and P2(S) < P2(T)

a) For each bargaining game S a solution concept p selects an alternative ø(S) e S. If the solution concept selects alternative p(S) = (@,(S), 42(S)), then player 1 receives utility o,(S) and player 2 receives utility o,(S). Suppose that a solution concept o satisfies "Property A": Property A: For bargaining games, S and T, if S CT then ,(S) < ¢,(T) and P2(S) < P2(T)

Microeconomic Theory

12th Edition

ISBN:9781337517942

Author:NICHOLSON

Publisher:NICHOLSON

Chapter8: Game Theory

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 8.12P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Consider the following game 1\2 Y Z A 10,3 3,9 B 8,5 6,1 Suppose Player 2 holds the following belief about Player 1: θ1 (A,B) = (9/10,1/10) What is the expected payoff from playing ‘Y’ ? What is the expected payoff from playing ‘Z’ ? Based on these beliefs, player 2 should respond by playing _____
Given the stage game above/below. Suppose that the players play (C,C) in period t = 1; 3; 5; ::: and plays (D,D) in period t = 2; 4; 6; ::. Compute the discounted payoff of each player.
Consider a Common Value auction with two bidders who both receive a signal X that is uniformly distributed between 0 and 1. The (common) value V of the good the players are bidding for is the average of the two signals, i.e. V = (X1+X2)/2. Compute the symmetric Nash equilibrium bidding strategy for the second-price sealed-bid auction assuming that players are risk-neutral and have standard selfish preferences. Furthermore, you may assume that the other bidder is following a linear bidding strategy. Make sure to explain your notation and the steps you take to derive the result.
Which of the following is FALSE for the grim trigger strategy and the infinite horizon repeated Prisoner's Dilemma game illustrated above? A. In the grim trigger strategy profile, if a player chooses D in a period, then both players chooses D forever after that period B. The threshold discount factor for sustaining cooperation under grim trigger strategy depends on the utility numbers in the stage game C. If all utility numbers remain the same but 3 is replaced by 5 in the stage game, then cooperation CANNOT be sustained in this game for all possible values of the discount factor.
See the extensive form game image attached. 1) Solve the game by backward induction 2) Find all the pure-strategy Nash equilibria (in complete contingent plans)of the extensive-form game (no need to write down thenormal-form representation)
Players 1, 2, and 3 are playing a game in which the strategy of player i isdenoted yi and can be any nonnegative real number. The payoff function for player 1 is V1(y1,y2,y3) = y1 + y1y2 - (y1)2,for player 2 is V2(y1,y2,y3) = y2 + y1y2 - (y2)2,and for player 3 is V3(y1,y2,y3) = (10 - y1 - y2 - y3)y3.These payoff functions are hill shaped. Find a Nash equilibrium. (Hint: Thepayoff functions are symmetric for players 1 and 2.)
Consider the following voting game. There are three players, 1, 2 and 3. And there are three alternatives: A, B and C. Players vote simultaneously for an alternative. Abstaining is not allowed. Thus, the strategy space for each player is {A, B, C}. The alternative with the most votes wins. If no alternative receives a majority, then alternative A is selected. Denote ui(d) the utility obtained by player i if alternave d {A, B, C} is selected. The payoff functions are, u1 (A) = u2 (B) = u3 (C) = 2 u1 (B) = u2 (C) = u3 (A) = 1 u1 (C) = u2 (A) = u3 (B) = 0 a. Let us denote by (i, j, k) a profile of pure strategies where player 1’s strategy is (to vote for) i, player 2’s strategy is j and player 3’s strategy is k. Show that the pure strategy profiles (A,A,A) and (A,B,A) are both Nash equilibria. b. Is (A,A,B) a Nash equilibrium? Comment.
A strategy is a decision rule that describes the actions a player will take at each decision point. The normal-form game indicates the players in the game, the possible strategies of the players, and the payoffs to the players that will result from alternative strategies. In the game presented in Table Normal-Form Game, does player B have a dominant strategy? What is the secure strategy for player B in the game presented in Table Normal-Form Game?
Consider a Common Value auction with two bidders who both receive a signal X that is uniformly distributed between 0 and 1. The (common) value V of the good the players are bidding for is the average of the two signals, i.e. V = (X1+X2)/2. the symmetric Nash equilibrium bidding strategy for the second-price sealed-bid auction assuming that players are risk-neutral and have standard selfish preferences. Furthermore, you may assume that the other bidder is following a linear bidding strategy. Make sure to explain your notation and the steps you take to derive the result.
Consider the attached extensive-form game tree, where player 1 moves first, then player 2. The top payoff accrues to player 1, the bottom payoff to player 2. (a) Draw the strategic form for this extensive form game.(b) Find all of the Nash equilibria, including any mixed.(c) Which of these Nash equilibria do you think would be actually played? Why?
Two firms are competing to establish one of two new wireless communication standards, A or B. A strategy is a choice of standard, and an outcome of this game is a choice of standard by each firm – for example, (A, B) represents the case where Firm 1 decides to develop standard A and Firm 2 develops standard B. Here, the first letter will always correspond to Firm 1’s decision, and the second letter to Firm 2’s decision. Firm 1 has the following preferences over outcomes, in order of highest to lowest preferred: it prefers (A, A) to (B, A) to (A, B) to (B, B). Firm 2 prefers (A, B) to (A, A) to (B, A) to (B, B). Suppose that firms simultaneously decide which standard to develop. What is the pure strategy Nash equilibrium?
Two firms are competing to establish one of two new wireless communication standards, A or B. A strategy is a choice of standard, and an outcome of this game is a choice of standard by each firm – for example, (A, B) represents the case where Firm 1 decides to develop standard A and Firm 2 develops standard B. Here, the first letter will always correspond to Firm 1’s decision, and the second letter to Firm 2’s decision. Firm 1 has the following preferences over outcomes, in order of highest to lowest preferred: it prefers (A, A) to (B, A) to (A, B) to (B, B). Firm 2 prefers (A, B) to (A, A) to (B, A) to (B, B). Suppose that firms simultaneously decide which standard to develop. What is the pure strategy Nash equilibrium? Is the answer (B,B)? If not please explian what is the answer?