The question is an two-part economics applied theory exercise. Period 1: Player 1 proposes sı to keep and (1-s1) for Player 2 to accept. If Player 2 accepts theoffer, the game is over and the proposed shares are paid out. If Player 2 rejects the Period 1 offer,the game proceeds to Period 2.Period 2: Player 2 proposes s2 for Player 1 to keep and (1-s2) for themselves. If Player 1 accepts,the game is over. If Player 1 rejects, the game goes to a third and final round.Period 3: Player 1 proposes s3 to keep and (1-s3) for Player 2 to accept. If Player 2 accepts theoffer, the game is over and the proposed shares are paid out. If Player 2 rejects the Period 3 offer,both players immediately receive $10. The remaining $80 is lost to arbitrators in the court system.In this sequential bargaining problem, the discount factor is 8 = 0.7. a) Solve for the game's subgame perfect equilibrium. Make sure to list whatoffer will be made in each period, in what period (if any) an offer will beaccepted, and how the surplus is divided.b) Now suppose Player 2 has an option to pay a bribe of $X at the beginning ofPeriod 1, which would increase the amount they'd receive in Period 3 if theoffer was rejected to $20. Assume no other bargaining aspects are affected bythe potential bribe. Given a discount factor of s = 0.7, what's the maximumbribe they'd be willing to pay?

Answer a) Given is the below information , in which there are two players , player one follows a…

a) Solve for the game's subgame perfect equilibrium. Make sure to list what offer will be made in each period, in what period (if any) an offer will be accepted, and how the surplus is divided. b) Now suppose Player 2 has an option to pay a bribe of $X at the beginning of Period 1, which would increase the amount they'd receive in Period 3 if the offer was rejected to $20. Assume no other bargaining aspects are affected by the potential bribe. Given a discount factor of s = 0.7, what's the maximum bribe they'd be willing to pay?

a) Solve for the game's subgame perfect equilibrium. Make sure to list what offer will be made in each period, in what period (if any) an offer will be accepted, and how the surplus is divided. b) Now suppose Player 2 has an option to pay a bribe of $X at the beginning of Period 1, which would increase the amount they'd receive in Period 3 if the offer was rejected to $20. Assume no other bargaining aspects are affected by the potential bribe. Given a discount factor of s = 0.7, what's the maximum bribe they'd be willing to pay?

Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach

5th Edition

ISBN:9781337106665

Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor

Publisher:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor

Chapter17: Making Decisions With Uncertainty

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 17.5IP

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Normal Form: Which one of the following descriptions below is CORRECT according to this Normal Form shown? 1.) If Player 2 believes that Player 1 randomly choose H or L with same probability, then Player 2's expected for choosing HC is 2. 2.) If Player 1 has 20% chance to play H and 80% chance to play L, Player 2 has 40% chance to play HD and 60% chance to play LC; then Player 1's expected payoff is 2. 3.) If Player 2 randomly play one of its 4 strategies without any preference, then Player 1's expected payoff for playing L is 2.5. 4.) If Player 2 believes that Player 1 has no probability to play L, then Player 2 would prefer to choose HC or HD.
FINITE REPETITION Alice and Bob are playing a repeated game in which a certain stage game is played twice in succession. All behaviour in the first period is observed by both players before the second period commences. In the stage game, Alice has 3 pure strategies and Bob has 2 pure strategies. How many pure strategies does Bob have in the repeated game? (If necessary, use a calculator to compute this number.) 2 6 2187 3 36 64 7 729 128 216
17-5. You are offered the following gamble based on coin flips. If the first head occurs on the first flip , you get $2 IF the first head occurs on the second flip you get $4, and so on, so that is the first head is on the Nth flip , you get $2N. The game ends only when a flip on the coin results in heads. What is the expected value of this gamble? When offered, most people say they would only pay less than $10 to play this game. What are two reasons why people are willing to pay so much less than the expected value?
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has hired you as a consultant to design an auction to sell wireless spectrum rights. The FCC indicates that its goal of using auctions to sell these spectrum rights is to generate revenue. Since most bidders are large telecommunications companies, you rationally surmise that all participants in the auction are risk neutral. Which auction type—first-price, second-price, English, or Dutch—would you recommend if all bidders value spectrum rights identically but have different estimates of the true underlying value of spectrum rights?
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has hired you as a consultant to design an auction to sell wireless spectrum rights. The FCC indicates that its goal of using auctions to sell these spectrum rights is to generate revenue. Since most bidders are large telecommunications companies, you rationally surmise that all participants in the auction are risk neutral. Which auction type—first-price, second-price, English, or Dutch—would you recommend if all bidders value spectrum rights identically but have different estimates of the true underlying value of spectrum rights? Kindly give a brief one-page description as part of the assignment.
You and a rival are engaged in a game in which there are three possible outcomes: you win, your rival wins (you lose), or the two of you tie. You get a payoff of 50 if you win, a payoff of 20 if you tie, and a payoff of 0 if you lose. What is your expected payoff in each of the following situations? (a) There is a 50% chance that the game ends in a tie, but only a 10% chance that you win. (There is thus a 40% chance that you lose.) (b) There is a 50–50 chance that you win or lose. There are no ties. (c) There is an 80% chance that you lose, a 10% chance that you win, and a 10% chance that you tie.
There are N>=2 collectors who engage in the auction of an antique. The collectorshave a common valuation of the antique, denoted by v, which is known to all. Thecollectors make a simultaneous bid. Let pn denote the bid by collector n = 1,....,N. The one with the highest bid wins the antique. The winner receives payoff v-pi.The other(s) receive zero payoff. If more than one collectors make the same highestbid, then they have an equal chance of winning the item. Prove that: A) It is not a Nash Equilibrium (NE) if the highest bid is v and onlyone collector bids this price.(b) It is not a NE if the highest bid is less than v.(c) It is a NE that the highest bid is v and more than one collector bidsthis price
FINITE REPETITION Alice and Bob are playing a repeated game in which a certain stage game is played twice in succession. All behaviour in the first period is observed by both players before the second period commences. In the stage game, Alice has 3 pure strategies and Bob has 2 pure strategies. How many pure strategies does Bob have in the repeated game? (If necessary, use a calculator to compute this number.) 2 6 2187 3 36 64 7 729 128 216 Please do fast ASAP fast
If Firm 1 chooses to release the console in October with probability of 0.692 or December with a probability of 0.308, then Firm 2 is indifferent between choosing a release date. If Firm 2 released the console in October with probability of 0.50 or December with a probability of 0.50, then Firm 1 is indifferent between choosing a release date Suppose now that instead of choosing the release date at the same time, the firms choose sequentially (but still in advance). Firm A chooses its release date first, then firm B observes that date and chooses its own date. Thepayoffs are otherwise the same as above. Represent the game tree corresponding to this dynamic game.
A drug company is considering investing $100 million today to bring a weight loss pill to the market. At the end of one year, the firm will know the payoff; there is a 0.50 probability that the pill will sell at a high price and generate $37 million per year of profit forever and a 0.50 probability that the pill will sell at a low price and generate $I million per year of profit forever. The interest rate is 10%. Suppose the firm decides to wait one year to determine whether the pill will sell at a high or low price. The firm will not invest if it learns that the pill will sell at a low price. What is the net present value of waiting one year to make the investment?O $88 millionO$122.72 millionO $201.22 millionO $64.5 million
Brown’s TV Production is considering producing a pilot for a comedy series for a major network. While the network may reject the pilot and series, it may also purchase the program for 1 or 2 years. Brown may produce the pilot or transfer the rights for the series to a competitor for $100,000. Brown’s profits are summarized in the following payoff table (profits in thousands). sate of nature reject 1 year 2 years produce pilot -100 50 150 sell to competitor 100 100 100 If the probability estimates for the states of nature are, P(reject)=0.20, P(1 year)=0.30, and P(2 years)=0.5, what is the maximum Brown should be willing to pay for inside information on what the network will do?
A ten-year term insurance is be issued to a life aged 50. The sum insured is $200,000 and payable immediately upon death. Premium payments are annual in advance. a) Using the SOA Standard Ultimate Life Table at i = 5% and UDD, compute the net annual premium determined by the equivalence principle. b) Find the probability that this contract makes a profit. c) Compute the gross premium determined by the equivalence principle if the initial expense is $500 plus 10% of the first premium, and if there is a renewal expense of 2% of the annual premium payment for the second and all subsequent premium payments.