BSA (µg) Abs 595 nm 0.000 0.000 0.050 0.102 0.100 0.226 0.200 0.401 0.121 µg 0.149 μg 0.492 με 0.609 μg 0.250 0.375 0.500 0.750 0.519 0.765 0.854 1.056 Using Excel and the method described in the Handout, create a plot of the given data and from the linear portion of the standard curve, determine the amount of an unknown sample with an Absorbance reading of 0.301.

BSA (µg) Abs 595 nm 0.000 0.000 0.050 0.102 0.100 0.226 0.200 0.401 0.121 µg 0.149 μg 0.492 με 0.609 μg 0.250 0.375 0.500 0.750 0.519 0.765 0.854 1.056 Using Excel and the method described in the Handout, create a plot of the given data and from the linear portion of the standard curve, determine the amount of an unknown sample with an Absorbance reading of 0.301.

Principles of Modern Chemistry

8th Edition

ISBN:9781305079113

Author:David W. Oxtoby, H. Pat Gillis, Laurie J. Butler

Publisher:David W. Oxtoby, H. Pat Gillis, Laurie J. Butler

Chapter20: Molecular Spectroscopy And Photochemistry

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 6P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Concentration [M] Absorbance Solution 1 86.29 0.64 Solution 2 51.986 0.29 …. Fig 1: [graph of the calibration curve, make sure to show: function, R2, 0 intercept]
Plot a professional quality standard curve (absorbance vs. protein amount in µg) with an appropriate title and caption underneath the plot from the data give above. The caption should include the best-fit data.
What percent transmittance range and what absorbance range are considered to be the optimum working ranges for spectrochemical measurements?
You are measuring the concentration of an unknown protein sample, and the absorbance at 595 nm (or A595) of your unknown is greater than that of the highest-concentration standard solution. It is not advisable to simply extrapolate the line of the standard curve to calculate the concentration of the unknown In this scenario, what would be the best strategy to measure the concentration of your unknown (instead of extrapolating from the standard curve)? (answer in 5 sentences)
You are measuring the concentration of an unknown protein sample, and the absorbance at 595 nm (or A595) of your unknown is greater than that of the highest-concentration standard solution. It is not advisable to simply extrapolate the line of the standard curve to calculate the concentration of the unknown In this scenario, what would be the best strategy to measure the concentration of your unknown (instead of extrapolating from the standard curve)?
A solution of KMnO4 with a concentration of 8.25 x 10-5 M yields an absorbance value of 0.1302 when measured in a 5.60 cm cuvette, set at a wavelength of 725 nm. Compute for the Molar Absorptivity Coefficient of the sample. Choices: a. 2.8182x10-8 c. 4.8182x10-8 b. 3.8182x10-8 d. 5.8182x10-8
The absorbance for a dye sample of unknown concentration is measured and the corrected absorbance is 0.666. The standard curve created is found to have this linear equation: y = 0.153x + 0.043 Calculate the concentration (ug / mL) of the dye sample. 4.54 3.33 4.07 5.17 2.07
Why should absorbance be less than 2? Please explain in terms of light transmittance
Based on the given data, construct and evaluate the calibration curve by plotting absorbance versus concentration. Calculate the mean concentration of Copper and Chromium in the unknown tap water sample
An absorption measurement with a 1 cm path length yields a reading of 0.004 absorbance units with a noise of 0.001 absorbance units and a mean noise reading of 0 for 10 scans averaged together. Assuming the noise for a single scan does not change if the path length is increased to 6 cm and the number of scans is increase to 100, what is the signal to noise of the new measurement.
What is scattering coefficient?
Derive an expression relating absorbance to the concentrations of standard and unknown ( c subscript s and c subscript x) and the volumes of the standards and unknown ( V subscript s and V subscript x ) as well as the volume to which the solutions were diluted (V subscript t). Derive expressions for the slope and the intercept of the straight line obtained in (a) in terms of the variables listed above.