Suppose that two firms produce mountain spring water and the market demand for mountain spring water is given as follows: P = 125 - 91 - 92 Firm 1 and Firm 2 have a MC = 5 a) Find the Cournot-Nash equilibrium price and quantity of each firm. b) Assume now that firm 1 becomes the Stackelberg leader. What will be the market price, output by each firm? Compared to part a, who gains? c) If Firm 1 chooses a quantity, then Firm 2 chooses a quantity (having observed Firm 1's quantity), then Firm 1 has an opportunity to revise its quantity (having observed Firm 2's quantity), then payoffs are determined, does either firm stand to gain relative to the case of simultaneous quantity choice? Why or why not? (hint: there is no need to do any calculation here)

Suppose that two firms produce mountain spring water and the market demand for mountain spring water is given as follows: P = 125 - 91 - 92 Firm 1 and Firm 2 have a MC = 5 a) Find the Cournot-Nash equilibrium price and quantity of each firm. b) Assume now that firm 1 becomes the Stackelberg leader. What will be the market price, output by each firm? Compared to part a, who gains? c) If Firm 1 chooses a quantity, then Firm 2 chooses a quantity (having observed Firm 1's quantity), then Firm 1 has an opportunity to revise its quantity (having observed Firm 2's quantity), then payoffs are determined, does either firm stand to gain relative to the case of simultaneous quantity choice? Why or why not? (hint: there is no need to do any calculation here)

Microeconomic Theory

12th Edition

ISBN:9781337517942

Author:NICHOLSON

Publisher:NICHOLSON

Chapter15: Imperfect Competition

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 15.7P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Suppose that two firms produce mountain spring water and the market demand for mountain spring water is given as follows: P= 254 - 91 - 92 Firm 1 and Firm 2 have a MC = 50 a) Find the Cournot-Nash equilibrium price and quantity of each firm. b) Assume now that firm 1 becomes the Stackelberg leader. What will be the market price, output by each firm? Compared to part a, who gains? c) If Firm 1 chooses a quantity, then Firm 2 chooses a quantity (having observed Firm 1's quantity), then Firm 1 has an opportunity to revise its quantity (having observed Firm 2's quantity), then payoffs are determined, does either firm stand to gain relative to the case of simultaneous quantity choice? Why or why not? (hint: there is no need to do any calculation here).
How would the Cournot equilibrium change in the airline example if American's marginal cost were $90 and United's were $180? The demand the duopoly quantity-setting firms face is Q=339−p with an inverse demand function of p=339−1qA −1qU where qA is the quantity produced by American and qU is the quantity produced by United. The Cournot-Nash equilibrium occurs where qA equals ? enter your response here and qU equals? enter your response here. (enter numeric responses using integers) Furthermore, the equilibrium occurs at a price of ? (round your answer to the nearest penny)
Consider the following statements about the Stackelberg game from the slides, assuming both firms are identical: (I) Denote by qC the Cournot equilibrium quantity produced by each firm, and by qPC the competitive quantity defined by P(qPC) = c (price equals marginal cost). Let s2 denote a strategy where firm 2 plays q2 = qC if it observes q 1 = qC, and plays q2 = qPC otherwise. Let s 1 denote a strategy where firm 1 plays q1 = qC. Then, (s1,s2) is a Nash equilibrium of the Stackelberg game, but it’s not a subgame perfect Nash equilibrium. (II) The first firm is allowed to change its quantity after observing firm 2’s quantity chosen at the second stage. (III) Consumers are worse off in the Stackelberg game compared with the Cournot outcome given the same parameters. Group of answer choices: a. Only II is correct b. Only I is correct. c. All options are incorrect. d. Only III is correct e. More than one option is correct.
Joe and Rebecca are small-town ready-mix concrete duopolists. The market demand function is Qd = 10,000 – 100P, where P is the price of a cubic yard of concrete and Qd is the number of cubic yards demanded per year. Marginal cost is $25 per cubic yard. Suppose that Joe and Rebecca compete in quantities and competition in this market is described by Cournot model. What are Joe and Rebecca’s Nash equilibrium outputs? What is the resulting price? What do they each earn as profit? How does the price compare to the marginal cost? Joe and Rebecca are small-town ready-mix concrete duopolists. The market demand function is Qd = 10,000 – 100P, where P is the price of a cubic yard of concrete and Qd is the number of cubic yards demanded per year. Marginal cost is $25 per cubic yard. Suppose that Joe and Rebecca compete in quantities and competition in this market is described by Cournot model. What are Joe and Rebecca’s Nash equilibrium outputs? What is the resulting price? What do they each…
Firms A and B operate in a market with inverse demand given by p = 160 - (q_{A} + q_{B}) Their total cost functions are C_{A}(q_{A}) = q_{A} ^ 2 / 2 and C_{B}(q_{B}) = q_{B} ^ 2 / 2 , respectively. The firms compete in quantities (Cournot competition). Denote by q_{A} ^ C and q_{B} ^ C the Nash equilibrium quantities in this game. What are q_{A} ^ C and q_{B} ^ C Hint: Again, note that I gave you the total cost function for each firm, not the marginal costs. (a) q_{A} ^ C = 24 q_{B} ^ C = 24 (b) q_{A} ^ C = 60 q_{B} ^ C = 30 (c) q_{A} ^ C = 40 q_{B} ^ C = 40 (d) q_{A} ^ C = 20 q_{B} ^ C = 20 (e) q_{A} ^ C = 30 q_{B} ^ C = 30
Consider a Duopoly model, in which two firms decide a quantity sequentially. For the convenience, let's say Firm 1 is a dominant firm and Firm 2 is a follower. The market demand is given by P=110 - 5Q, where Q is the total output (i.e., Q=Q1+Q2). Each firm has an identical cost function, TCi=7Qi, i=1, 2. Each firm maximizes its profit by choosing the quantity. In this Stackelberg equilibrium, Firm 1 will sell __________ units.
Two identical firms are engaged in Cournot competition, with cost functionsTCA(QA) = 10 QA and TCB(QB) = 10 QB. The market demand is given by P = 610 –2Q.a) Plot the best response functions and report the Cournot-Nash equilibrium quantities, price and profits.b) What are the prices, quantities, and profits for the firms if they decide to collude and share profits equally? c) Show that firms have an incentive the deviate from the collusive outcome.d) Find the Stackelberg equilibrium if A leads and B follows.e) Show the equilibria in the previous parts on the inverse demand function. Calculate and identify consumer surplus and deadweight loss in each equilibrium..
Consider a Cournot Duopoly model. The inverse demand for their products is given byP = 200 − 6Q, where Q is the total quantity supplied in the market (that is, Q = Q1 + Q2). Each firm has an identical cost function, given byT Ci = 2Qi, for i = 1, 2.(a) In the Cournot model, what does each firm choose?(b) What is the timing of each firm’s decision?(c) Find the Nash equilibrium quantities (Q∗1, Q∗2)?(d) What is the equilibrium price? Just help with c and d here please
Suppose two firms, A and B, have a cost function of ?(??) = 30??, for ? = ?, ?. The inverse demand for the market is given by ? = 120 − ?, where Q represents the total quantity in the market, ? = ?? + ??. 1. Solve for the firms’ outputs in a Nash Equilibrium of the Cournot Model. 2. Let Firm A be the first mover, and Firm B be the second mover. Solve for the firms’ outputs in a SPNE of the Stackelberg Model.
What is the duopoly Nash-Cournot equilibrium if the market demand function is Q = 500 - 10p and each firm’s marginal cost is 5¢ per unit?