Explain all right as well as wrong options In 1986 Congress drastically cut the marginal tax rate on upper income levels from 50% to 28%. Empirical evidence analyzing the labor supply effects of the tax cut found that women in the high income tax bracket Select one: A. reduced their labor force participation and hours worked significantly because of a dominant income effect. B. increased both labor force participation and hours of work significantly. C. experienced offsetting substitution and income effects. D. did not respond in any significant way to the tax cut, as their high level of income ensured that they were already content with their labor supply choices.
Explain all right as well as wrong options In 1986 Congress drastically cut the marginal tax rate on upper income levels from 50% to 28%. Empirical evidence analyzing the labor supply effects of the tax cut found that women in the high income tax bracket Select one: A. reduced their labor force participation and hours worked significantly because of a dominant income effect. B. increased both labor force participation and hours of work significantly. C. experienced offsetting substitution and income effects. D. did not respond in any significant way to the tax cut, as their high level of income ensured that they were already content with their labor supply choices.
Economics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Course List)
16th Edition
ISBN:9781305506725
Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Chapter28: Income Inequality And Poverty
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 9CQ
Related questions
Question
Explain all right as well as wrong options
In 1986 Congress drastically cut the marginal tax rate on upper income levels from 50% to 28%. Empirical evidence analyzing the labor supply effects of the tax cut found that women in the high income tax bracket
Select one:
A.
reduced their labor force participation and hours worked significantly because of a dominant income effect.
B.
increased both labor force participation and hours of work significantly.
C.
experienced offsetting substitution and income effects.
D.
did not respond in any significant way to the tax cut, as their high level of income ensured that they were already content with their labor supply choices.
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 6 steps
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you
Economics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou…
Economics
ISBN:
9781305506725
Author:
James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Microeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa…
Economics
ISBN:
9781305506893
Author:
James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Economics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou…
Economics
ISBN:
9781305506725
Author:
James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Microeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa…
Economics
ISBN:
9781305506893
Author:
James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:
Cengage Learning