In one hour, Beth can produce 40 caps or 5 jackets, and Joan can produce 20 caps or 10 jackets. Which of the following trades would at least one of them NEVER be willing to make? Beth gives Joan 3 caps and Joan gives Beth 1 jacket Beth gives Joan 9 caps and Joan gives Beth 1 jacket Beth gives Joan 7 caps and Joan gives Beth 1 jacket Beth gives Joan 5 caps and Joan gives Beth 1 jacket O O O O

In one hour, Beth can produce 40 caps or 5 jackets, and Joan can produce 20 caps or 10 jackets. Which of the following trades would at least one of them NEVER be willing to make? Beth gives Joan 3 caps and Joan gives Beth 1 jacket Beth gives Joan 9 caps and Joan gives Beth 1 jacket Beth gives Joan 7 caps and Joan gives Beth 1 jacket Beth gives Joan 5 caps and Joan gives Beth 1 jacket O O O O

Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach

5th Edition

ISBN:9781337106665

Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor

Publisher:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor

Chapter16: Bargaining

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 8MC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Sadaam Hussein is deciding where to hide his weapons of mass destruction(WMD), while the United Nations is deciding where to look for them. Thepayoff to Hussein from successfully hiding WMD is 5 and from havingthem found is 2. For the UN, the payoff to finding WMD is 9 and from notfinding them is 4. Hussein can hide them in facility X, Y, or Z. The UNinspection team has to decide which facilities to check. Because the inspectors are limited in terms of time and personnel, they cannot check allfacilities.a. Suppose the UN has two pure strategies: It can either inspect facilitiesX and Y (both of which are geographically close to each other) orinspect facility Z. Find a Nash equilibrium in mixed strategies.b. Suppose the UN can inspect any two facilities, so that it has three purestrategies. The UN can inspect X and Y, X and Z, or Y and Z. Find aNash equilibrium in mixed strategies.
Kayla and Kevin are friends who go together to a used textbook seller who has two copies ofthe biology book that they both need for their class this semester. The cost to the seller ofacquiring the books was $25 each and no other students will need this book. Kayla states thatshe is willing to pay $40 for the book, while Kevin says he is willing to pay $80. Which ofthe following describes the most likely conclusion to this scenario? Group of answer choices The seller will sell the books to both Kayla and Kevin for $40 each because if they tried tocharge Kevin a higher price, Kayla would engage in arbitrage. The seller will sell one book to Kayla for $40 and one book to Kevin for $80 because thismarket meets all three requirements for price discrimination. The seller will sell the books to both Kayla and Kevin for $80 each because Kevin's highervalue exceeds Kayla's willingness to pay. The seller will sell the books to both Kayla and Kevin for $25 each because that is howmuch the…
when selecting the lineup for relays, teams start with the slowest runner and finishwith the fastest. In Beijing 2008, Jamaica were the hot favorites to win the 4 X 100 since theUK and USA were disqualified in the semis. Moreover, Usain Bolt came into the lineup. Thisleft the Jamaicans to make a key decision: Which position should they run Bolt? Look at thesplits both Bolt and Asafa Powell had and mention which position each runner should havecome in in race time.
Suppose that in an hour Chip can gather 8 pounds of fruit or 4 pounds of nuts. In an hour, Monk can gather 9 pounds of fruit or 3 pounds of nuts. Which of the following choices would benefit both Chip and Monk if trade occurred? Please choose the correct answer from the following choices, and then select the submit answer button. 1 pound of fruit for 2/5 pound of nuts 1 pound of fruit for 1 pound of nuts. 1 pound of fruit for 3/4 pound of nuts 1 pound of fruit for 1/10 pound of nuts I dont understand the math breakdown for these types of trade question I realize Chip Fruit to nuts is 2:1 and Monk is 3:1 but that is where I dont undersand the further breakdown
Suppose that there are three beachfront parcels of land available for sale in Astoria and six people who would each like to purchase one parcel. Assume that the parcels are essentially identical and that the minimum selling price of each is $570,000. The following table states each person's willingness and ability to purchase a parcel. Person Willingness and Ability to Purchase (Dollars) Ana 630,000 Charles 590,000 Dina 550,000 Gilberto 510,000 Juanita 500,000 Yakov 700,000 Which of these people will buy one of the three beachfront parcels? Check all that apply. Ana Charles Dina Gilberto Juanita Yakov Assume that the three beachfront parcels are sold to the people that you indicated in the previous section. Suppose that a few days after the last of those beachfront parcels is sold, another essentially identical beachfront parcel becomes available for sale at a minimum price of $560,000. This fourth parcel ____ (will,…
Daniel and Kevin are two hardworking builders for solo, independently-owned companies. They can produce Chairs and Tables. As a result, they each have PPFs (Possibilities Production Frontiers) that illustrate their production. Daniel's PPF is shown by the equation: Qc = 12 - 3Qt. Likewise, Kevin's PPF is shown by the equation: Qt = 12 - 3Qc. Since they trust each other and are honest in their terms, Daniel and Kevin trade with each other and only each other; they do not take their goods to markets, and they do not interact with outside sellers/buyers. Since they want to make sure that they provide for their families in the most fair way possible, they set up and agree upon a few terms of trade. The terms are as follows: FIRST, the terms of trade are 1 Chair in exchange for 1 Table. SECOND, each of them specializes according to their own comparative advantage. THIRD, since Kevin needs a few extra things, he CONSUMES 3 units of the goods that he produces. With that said, I have a few…
Imagine that two firms in two different countries want to bring a new product tomarket. Due to economies of scale, if both firms do this, they will both lose £50million. But if only one firm does this, it will gain £300 million.(a) What is the best strategy for firm A, if firm B has not yet entered the market, andwhy?(b) Illustrate this with a game theory diagram, showing appropriate payouts.(c) What is the welfare-maximising strategy for a government, and why?
A backpacker gets stranded on an island, and rescue is about a week away. Two cannibals live on the island. The cannibals are not friendly to each other, and both regularly attempt to eat the other. Both cannibals would like to eat the backpacker, but as we all know, a big meal makes one tired and defenceless. In the event that one of them eats the backpacker, the other might strike and eat the eater. Hence, if choosing to eat the backpacker, there is a risk of being eaten oneself. If both of them show up to eat the backpacker, they are friendly enough to share and split the backpacker in half. Both cannibals have a less desirable, vegetarian, diet available on the island.Let eating the (entire) backpacker or cannibal give a payoff of 2. A vegetarian diet is worth 1. Being eaten gives a payoff of 0.a) Write down the normal form representation of the game between the two cannibals.b) The backpacker realizes that the cannibals (otherwise) are highly intelligent and rational beings.…
Two athletes of equal ability are competing for aprize of $10,000. Each is deciding whether to takea dangerous performance-enhancing drug. If oneathlete takes the drug and the other does not, the onewho takes the drug wins the prize. If both or neithertake the drug, they tie and split the prize. Taking thedrug imposes health risks that are equivalent to a lossof X dollars.QuickQuiz Answers1. d 2. c 3. a 4. d 5. c 6. b 7. d 8. ba. Draw a 2×2 payoff matrix describing the decisionsthe athletes face.b. For what X is taking the drug the Nashequilibrium?c. Does making the drug safer (that is, lowering X)make the athletes better or worse off? Explain.
[MUST SHOW WORKI You and your friend Tom are stranded on a deserted island and need to survive by collecting firewood and fishing for food. You can collect 8 logs per hour or 200 calories of fish per hour. Your friend Tom can collect 3 logs per hour or 500 calories of fish per hour. Who has an absolute advantage in collecting firewood? Select one: O A. Both You and Tom. O B. Neither You nor Tom. O C. You. O D. Tom. O E. Impossible to calculate without more information.
In 1938, major powers met in Munich to discuss Germany’s demands to annex part of Czechoslovakia. Let us think of the issue as the proportion of Czechoslovak territory given to Germany. Possible outcomes can be plotted on a single dimension, where 0 implies that Germany obtains no territory and 1 implies that Germany obtains all of Czechoslovakia: Most countries at Munich (“Allies” for short) wish to give nothing to Germany: their ideal point is 0, which gives them utility of 1. Their worst possible outcome is for Germany to take all of Czechoslovakia; hence an outcome of 1 gives them utility of 0. In between these extremes, the Allies could propose a compromise, X, which gives them utility of 1 – X. The question for the Allies is whether to propose a compromise or fight a war with Germany, which they are sure will ensue if they offer nothing. If they propose a compromise and Germany accepts, they get a payoff of 1 – X. If they fight, they win with probability p and lose with…
In 1938, major powers met in Munich to discuss Germany’s demands to annex part of Czechoslovakia. Let us think of the issue as the proportion of Czechoslovak territory given to Germany. Possible outcomes can be plotted on a single dimension, where 0 implies that Germany obtains no territory and 1 implies that Germany obtains all of Czechoslovakia: Most countries at Munich (“Allies” for short) wish to give nothing to Germany: their ideal point is 0, which gives them utility of 1. Their worst possible outcome is for Germany to take all of Czechoslovakia; hence an outcome of 1 gives them utility of 0. In between these extremes, the Allies could propose a compromise, X, which gives them utility of 1 – X. The question for the Allies is whether to propose a compromise or fight a war with Germany, which they are sure will ensue if they offer nothing. If they propose a compromise and Germany accepts, they get a payoff of 1 – X. If they fight, they win with probability p and lose with…