Kara and Kyle are competing sockeye salmon fishers. Both have been allocated ITQs that limit their catch to 2,000 tons of sockeye salmon each. Kara's cost per ton is $8; Kyle's cost per ton is $12. If the market price of sockeye salmon is $15 per ton, and Kara and Kyle both catch their quota, their combined profit will be Multiple Choice $20,000. $14,000. $30,000. $6,000

Kara and Kyle are competing sockeye salmon fishers. Both have been allocated ITQs that limit their catch to 2,000 tons of sockeye salmon each. Kara's cost per ton is $8; Kyle's cost per ton is $12. If the market price of sockeye salmon is $15 per ton, and Kara and Kyle both catch their quota, their combined profit will be Multiple Choice $20,000. $14,000. $30,000. $6,000

Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach

5th Edition

ISBN:9781337106665

Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor

Publisher:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor

Chapter16: Bargaining

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 8MC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Kara and Kyle are competing sockeye salmon fishers. Both have been allocated ITQs that limit their catch to 2,000 tons of sockeye salmon each. Kara's cost per ton is $6; Kyle's cost per ton is $10. If the market price of sockeye salmon is $14 per ton, what is the maximum amount Kara would be willing to pay per ton for Kyle's ITQs? Multiple Choice $6. $4. $8. $14.
Melanie and Oli are competing Pacific halibut fishers. Both have been allocated ITQs that limit their catch to 1,000 tons of Pacific halibut each. Melanie's cost per ton is $36; Oli's cost per ton is $40. If the market price of Pacific halibut is $48 per ton, what is the minimum amount per ton that Melanie would have to offer Oli to convince him to sell Melanie his ITQs? Multiple Choice $6. $8. $12. $4.
Splitting Pizza: You and a friend are in an Italian restaurant, and the owner offers both of you a free eight-slice pizza under the following condition. Each of you must simultaneously announce how many slices you would like; that is, each player i ∈ 1, 2 names his desired amount of pizza, 0 ≤ si ≤ 8. If s1 + s2 ≤ 8 then the players get their demands (and the owner eats any leftover slices). If s1 + s2 > 8, then the players get nothing. Assume that you each care only about how much pizza you individually consume, and the more the better.What outcomes can be supported as pure-strategy Nash equilibria?
A Gain from Trade occurs when a unit is sold for a price greater than the unit of the good is worth to a seller and, simultaneously, bought for a price less than the good is worth to a buyer. Consider the first 2 units of the good that would be sold in this market (the vertical red line on the graph). Which answer choices are correct? If Kai and Mint sold one unit each to Gob and Yam at a price of $6, the trade would be mutually beneficial. At a price of $6, Gob would benefit by $3 because she is paying $6 for a unit of the good which is worth $9 to her. At a price of $6, Kai would benefit by $4 because she is getting $6 for a unit of the good which is worth $2 to her. For the first 2 units of the good there is potential gain from trade of $7 for each of the 2 units. For the first 2 units of the good sold the difference between the value to buyer and seller is $9 each. This means there is a potential gain from trade of $9 per unit. If the first 2 units of the…
two timber companies, Alpha and Beta, have to decide whether to harvest timber from the North Hill or the South Hill and then sell the timbers in the same market. If both harvest from North Hill, each company can harvest 100 tons of timber. If both companies harvest from South Hill, each company can harvest 150 tons of timber. If one company harvests from North Hill and the other harvests from South Hill, the company at North Hill can harvest 150 tons of timber while the company at South Hill can harvest 250 tons of timber. The price of timber is dependent on the total supply of timber in the market. The price will be $180 per ton if the total supply is 200 tons, $150 per ton if the total supply is 300 tons and $100 per ton if the total supply is 400 tons. To both companies, the cost of harvesting in North Hill is $5,000 and the cost of harvesting in South Hill is $10,000. (a) If Alpha and Beta were to make a decision simultaneously, construct the payoff matrix in terms of profit for…
There are six farmers in Great Britain with access to government land to graze their cows for free. They all must share the land. Each farmer has an individual incentive to put as many of his or her cows on the land to increase their profits but each additional cow depletes the resources for all six farmers and if the farmers put too many cows on the pasture, the grass will be depleted and all the cows will starve. The grass is a limited resource. What strategy do you propose to the farmers?
Jill and Jack both have two pails that can be used to carry water down from a hill. Each makes only one trip down the hill, and each pail of water can be sold for $4. Carrying the pails of water down requires considerable effort. Both Jill and Jack would be willing to pay $2 each to avoid carrying one pail down the hill, and an additional $3 to avoid carrying a second pail down the hill.a. If Jack and Jill each must decide whether to carry one or two pails of water down from the top of the hill, how many pails will each child choose to carry? ___ pail(s)b. Jill and Jack’s parents are worried that the two children don’t cooperate enough with one another. Suppose they make Jill and Jack share equally their revenues from selling the water. Given that both are self-interested, construct the payoff matrix for the decisions Jill and Jack face regarding the number of pails of water each should carry. Carry 1 pail Jack Carry 2 pails…
Two hunters may choose, individually and simultaneously, to go deer hunting, as the deer can provide abundant and appetizing food, or to go hare hunting, also appetizing, but scarce. Deer hunting represents a challenge and requires mutual coordination. Hunting a deer without cooperation means that the deer will be safe; while hunting a deer in groups guarantees it will be caught. Hare hunting is an individual activity that does not require another hunter, and the one who decides to go hare hunting always makes it. The reward for hunting a hare is 1, while the reward for each of the hunters for catching a deer together is 3 for each one. The reward for not hunting a deer is 0. Specify the game in a normal way arising from this situation. Do the players have strictly dominated strategies? Determine the set of rationalizable strategies in this case. Find all Nash equilibriums in this case, if any. Are they efficient in Pareto sense? Justify your answer.
Suppose that there are three beachfront parcels of land available for sale in Astoria and six people who would each like to purchase one parcel. Assume that the parcels are essentially identical and that the minimum selling price of each is $570,000. The following table states each person's willingness and ability to purchase a parcel. Person Willingness and Ability to Purchase (Dollars) Ana 630,000 Charles 590,000 Dina 550,000 Gilberto 510,000 Juanita 500,000 Yakov 700,000 Which of these people will buy one of the three beachfront parcels? Check all that apply. Ana Charles Dina Gilberto Juanita Yakov Assume that the three beachfront parcels are sold to the people that you indicated in the previous section. Suppose that a few days after the last of those beachfront parcels is sold, another essentially identical beachfront parcel becomes available for sale at a minimum price of $560,000. This fourth parcel ____ (will,…
Daniel and Kevin are two hardworking builders for solo, independently-owned companies. They can produce Chairs and Tables. As a result, they each have PPFs (Possibilities Production Frontiers) that illustrate their production. Daniel's PPF is shown by the equation: Qc = 12 - 3Qt. Likewise, Kevin's PPF is shown by the equation: Qt = 12 - 3Qc. Since they trust each other and are honest in their terms, Daniel and Kevin trade with each other and only each other; they do not take their goods to markets, and they do not interact with outside sellers/buyers. Since they want to make sure that they provide for their families in the most fair way possible, they set up and agree upon a few terms of trade. The terms are as follows: FIRST, the terms of trade are 1 Chair in exchange for 1 Table. SECOND, each of them specializes according to their own comparative advantage. THIRD, since Kevin needs a few extra things, he CONSUMES 3 units of the goods that he produces. With that said, I have a few…
Melanie and Oli are competing Pacific halibut fishers. Both have been allocated ITQs that limit their catch to 1,000 tons of Pacific halibut each. Melanie's cost per ton is $20; Oli's cost per ton is $28.Refer to the information given and assume that the market price of Pacific halibut is $40 per ton. If Melanie pays Oli $10 per ton for his ITQs and then catches her new limit of 2,000 tons, their combined profit would be: $28,000. $32,000. $40,000. $54,000.
Andy, Brad, and Carly are playing a new online video game: Zombie Civil War. Each has an army of 100 zombies and must decide how to allocate them to battle each of the other two players’ armies. Three simultaneous battles are occurring: one between Andy and Brad, one between Andy and Carly, and one between Brad and Carly. Let Ab denote how many zombie soldiers Andy allocates to his battle with Brad, with the remaining 100 - Ab soldiers in Andy’s zombie army assigned to the battle with Carly. Bc denotes the number of zombie soldiers that Brad allocates to his battle with Carly, and 100 - Bc zombies go to his battle with Andy. Ca is the the number of zombie soldiers that Carly allocates to the battle with Andy, and 100 - Ca in her battle with Brad. To see how payoffs are determined, consider Andy. If Ab > 100 - Bc, so that Andy has more zombies than Brad in the Andy-Brad battle, then Andy wins the battle and receives w points where w > 2. If Ab = 100 - Bc, so that Andy and Brad…