A defender was installed 10 years ago at a capital investment cost of $67,000. It presently has a market value of $13,500. If kept, the defender has an economic life of three years, operating expenses of $15,000 per year, and a market value of S9,500 at the end of year (EOY) three. The defender is being depreciated by the straight line method using a 15-year write-off period with an estimated salvage value for depreciation purposes of $10,500. As an altenative, the defender can be replaced with a challenger which will cost $60,000 to install, have operating expenses of S9,000 per year, and have a final market value of $12,000 at the end of its 20-year economic life. If the replacement is made, the challenger will be depreciated with the straight line method over a 20-year life with an estimated salvage value of $12,000 at EOY 20. Such equipment (defender or challenger) will be needed indefinitely. If the after-tax MARR is 10% per year and the effective income tax rate is 25%, should the defender or the challenger be recommended? E Click the icon to view the interest and annuity table for discrete compounding when MARR = 10% per year. The AW value for the defender is S. (Round to the nearest dollar.) The AW value for the challenger is S (Round to the nearest dollar.) The defender should be

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
14th Edition
ISBN:9780190931919
Author:NEWNAN
Publisher:NEWNAN
Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1QTC
icon
Related questions
Question
1
A defender was installed 10 years ago at a capital investment cost of $67,000. It presently has a market value of $13,500. If kept, the defender has an economic life of three years, operating expenses of $15,000 per year, and a market value of S9,500 at the
end of year (EOY) three. The defender is being depreciated by the straight line method using a 15-year write-off period with an estimated salvage value for depreciation purposes of $10,500.
As an altenative, the defender can be replaced with a challenger which will cost $60,000 to install, have operating expenses of S9,000 per year, and have a final market value of $12,000 at the end of its 20-year economic life. If the replacement is made, the
challenger will be depreciated with the straight line method over a 20-year life with an estimated salvage value of $12,000 at EOY 20. Such equipment (defender or challenger) will be needed indefinitely. If the after-tax MARR is 10% per year and the effective
income tax rate is 25%, should the defender or the challenger be recommended?
E Click the icon to view the interest and annuity table for discrete compounding when MARR = 10% per year.
The AW value for the defender is S. (Round to the nearest dollar.)
The AW value for the challenger is S (Round to the nearest dollar.)
The defender should be
Transcribed Image Text:A defender was installed 10 years ago at a capital investment cost of $67,000. It presently has a market value of $13,500. If kept, the defender has an economic life of three years, operating expenses of $15,000 per year, and a market value of S9,500 at the end of year (EOY) three. The defender is being depreciated by the straight line method using a 15-year write-off period with an estimated salvage value for depreciation purposes of $10,500. As an altenative, the defender can be replaced with a challenger which will cost $60,000 to install, have operating expenses of S9,000 per year, and have a final market value of $12,000 at the end of its 20-year economic life. If the replacement is made, the challenger will be depreciated with the straight line method over a 20-year life with an estimated salvage value of $12,000 at EOY 20. Such equipment (defender or challenger) will be needed indefinitely. If the after-tax MARR is 10% per year and the effective income tax rate is 25%, should the defender or the challenger be recommended? E Click the icon to view the interest and annuity table for discrete compounding when MARR = 10% per year. The AW value for the defender is S. (Round to the nearest dollar.) The AW value for the challenger is S (Round to the nearest dollar.) The defender should be
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Nash Equilibrium
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Economics
ISBN:
9780190931919
Author:
NEWNAN
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Economics
ISBN:
9781259290619
Author:
Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education