Prospect Y = ($20, 0.5; $40, 0.5)Justin values Prospect Y at $25 (so, for Justin, CE(Y) - $25)Prospect Z = ($15, 0.5 ; $45, 0.5)Which of the following statements is true?O For Justin, EV(Y) > EV(Z)O For Justin, CE(Z) < $25O For Justin, U(EV(Y)) > U(EV(Z)O The information provided by this problem is not sufficient to determine whether Justin is Risk Averse or RIsk Loving.

Utility function is the key to understand the efficacy of the given equations in the options.

Prospect Y - ($20, 0.5; $40, 0.5) Justin values Prospect Y at $25 (so, for Justin, CE(Y) - $25) Prospect Z = ($15, 0.5; $45, 0.5) Which of the following statements is true? For Justin, EV(Y) > EVZ) O For Justin, CE(Z) < $25 O For Justin, U(EV(Y) > U(EV(Z) O The information provided by this problem is not sufficient to determine whether Justin is Risk Averse or RIsk Loving.

Prospect Y - ($20, 0.5; $40, 0.5) Justin values Prospect Y at $25 (so, for Justin, CE(Y) - $25) Prospect Z = ($15, 0.5; $45, 0.5) Which of the following statements is true? For Justin, EV(Y) > EVZ) O For Justin, CE(Z) < $25 O For Justin, U(EV(Y) > U(EV(Z) O The information provided by this problem is not sufficient to determine whether Justin is Risk Averse or RIsk Loving.

Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach

5th Edition

ISBN:9781337106665

Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor

Publisher:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor

Chapter17: Making Decisions With Uncertainty

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 17.5IP

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

You are considering a $500,000 investment in the fast-food industry and have narrowed your choice to either a McDonald’s or a Penn Station East Coast Subs franchise. McDonald’s indicates that, based on the location where you are proposing to open a new restaurant, there is a 25 percent probability that aggregate 10-year profits (net of the initial investment) will be $16 million, a 50 percent probability that profits will be $8 million, and a 25 percent probability that profits will be −$1.6 million. The aggregate 10-year profit projections (net of the initial investment) for a Penn Station East Coast Subs franchise is $48 million with a 2.5 percent probability, $8 million with a 95 percent probability, and −$48 million with a 2.5 percent probability. Considering both the risk and expected profitability of these two investment opportunities, which is the better investment? Explain carefully.
You are in the market for a new refrigerator for your company's lounge, and you have narrowed the search down to two models. The energy-efficient model sells for $700 and will save you $45 at the end of each of the next five years in electricity costs. The standard model has features similar to the energy-efficient model but provides no future saving in electricity costs. It is priced at only $500. Assuming your opportunity cost of funds is 6 percent, which refrigerator should you purchase?
You live in an area where there is a possibility of a massive earthquake, so consider purchasing earthquake insurance for your home at an annual cost of $180. The probability of an earthquake damaging your home in the course of a year is 0.001. If this occurs, you estimate that the cost of the damage (fully covered by insurance) will be $160,000. Your total assets (including the house) are worth $250,000. a) Apply the maximum expected value decision rule to determine the alternative (to buy insurance or not) that maximizes the value of your assets after one year. b) You developed a utility function that measures the value of your assets in x dollars (x ≥ 0). This utility function is U(x) = √x. Compare the utility of reducing the total of your assets for the next year by a value equal to the value of the insurance, with the expected utility next year of not purchasing tremor insurance. Should you purchase the insurance?
Two partners start a business. Each has two possible strategies, spend full time or secretly take a second job and spend only part time on the business. Any profits that the business makes will be split equally between the two partners, regardless of whether they work full time or part time for the business. If a partner takes a second job, he will earn $20,000 from this job plus his share of profits from the business. If he spends full time on the business, his only source of income is his share of profits from this business. If both partners spend full time on the business, total profits will be $200,000. If one partner spends full time on the business and the other takes a second job, the business profits will be $80,000. If both partners take second job, the total business profits are $20,000. a) This game has no pure strategy Nash equilibria, but has a mixed strategy equilibrium. b) This game has two Nash equilibria, one in which each partner has an income of $100,000 and one in…
A risk-averse manager is considering a project that will cost £100. There is a 10 percent chance the project will generate revenues of £100, an 80 percent chance it will yield revenues of £50, and a 10 percent chance it will yield revenues of £500. Should the manager adopt the project? Explain. What will a risk-neutral and risk-loving manager do in the same situation?
You are taking two courses this semester, biology and chemistry. You have quizzes coming up in both classes. The table below shows your grade on each quiz for different numbers of hours studying for each quiz. For instance, the second row implies that one hour of studying for Chemistry will generate an expected grade of 73 on Chemistry, whereas one hour of studying for Biology will generate an expected grade of 75 on Biology. Hours of Study Chemistry Biology 0 65 68 1 73 75 2 79 80 3 83 83 Your goal is to maximize your average grade on the two quizzes. Use the idea of optimization in differences to decide how much time you would spend studying for each quiz if you had a total of 1, 2, or 3 hours to prepare for each exam. If you had 1 hour, you should study..... If you had 2 hours, then you should study.... hour(s) for chemistry and..... hour(s) for biology. If you had 3 hours, then you should study ..... hour(s) for chemistry and..... hour(s) for biology.…
A risk-averse manager is considering two projects. The first project involves expanding the market for bologna; the second involves expanding the market for caviar. There is a 10 percent chance of a recession and a 90 percent chance of an economic boom. During a boom, the bologna project will lose $10,000, whereas the caviar project will earn $20,000. During a recession, the bologna project will earn $12,000 and the caviar project will lose $8,000. If the alternative is earning $3,000 on a safe asset (say, a Treasury bill), what should the manager do? Why?
The following payoff table provides profits based on various posible decision alternativesand various levels of demand at Kmart Print Shop. Alternatives Low High Alternative 1 10,000 30,000 Alternative 2 5,000 40,000 Alternative 3 -2,000 50,000 The probability of low demand is 0.4, whereas the probability of high demand is 0.6.What is the highest possible expected monetary value?
Tess and Lex earn $40,000 per year and all earnings are spent on consumption (c). Tess and Lex both have the utility function c. Both could experience an adverse event that results in earnings of $0 per year. Tess has a 1% chance of experiencing an adverse event and Lex has a 12% chance of experiencing an adverse event. Tess and Lex are both aware of their risk of an adverse event. 1. Suppose the actuarially fair premium charge is 2600, Calculate Tess’ expected utility with full insurance if she is charged the premium. Round to two decimal places. 2. What is the premium that private insurance companies will charge for full insurance? Round to two decimal places. 3.Assume the social welfare function is the sum of the Tess’ and Lex’s utility functions. Select the correct statement regarding the explanation for what has happened in the private market and the role of social insurance. a.Adverse section has lead to market failure. The government could improve social welfare by…
We consider the following decision problem, with 4 decisions di,i∈{1,…,4}, and four possible outcomes ωi,i∈{1,…,4}, with the following table of profits: ω1 ω2 ω3 ω4 d1 30 30 0 30 d2 20 20 20 20 d3 0 50 10 40 d4 15 30 10 25 Which decision should be chosen for rewards depending on four different possible outcomes, according to the maximin rule, maximax rule, and optimism-pessimism rule with α<1/3?
Assume you are faced with two decision alternatives and two states of nature whose profit payoff table is shown below. Decision Alternative State of Nature 1 State of Nature 2 Decision 1 25 30 Decision 2 45 15 The probability of state of nature 1 is 0.4.(a) Compute the expected value of each alternative.(b) Which decision is the optimal decision?(c) Compute the expected value with perfect information.(d) Compute the expected value of perfect information.
Market Data Rate of Return Standard Deviation Treasury Bills 4.25% 0.00% S&P 500 12.00% 21.00% Required: Using the information in the table above and the varying risk aversions below, please calculate allocations to the risky and risk-free assets. (Use cells A5 to C6 from the given information to complete this question.) Risk Aversion Percent Allocated to the Market (S&P 500) Percent Allocated to Treasury Bills 4.00 2.00 1.50