Please help with #1 Q1. Suppose player A and player B are playing the following game. Player A can choose "Up" and"Down", while player B can choose "Left" and "Right". The payoff matrix is depicted below. PlayerA's payoff is the first entry. Player B's payoff is the second entry.Player AUDPlayer BL(7,5)(1, 1)a. Suppose this is a one-shot, simultaneously-move game, find all the Nash equilibria (pure andmixed).RunQ2. Consider this sequential game. Assume the players can only use pure strategies(-25,-4)R(1, 1)(4, 10)Player 1DriveFlyFAPlayer 2Walk Run(10,0)(3, 20)WalkSwim(2,10) (1,9)a. Use backward induction to solve for the subgame perfect Nash equilibrium.

As per student request I will provide answer of Question number-1 in below.

Q1. Suppose player A and player B are playing the following game. Player A can choose "Up" and "Down", while player B can choose "Left" and "Right". The payoff matrix is depicted below. Player A's payoff is the first entry. Player B's payoff is the second entry. Player A U D Run a. Suppose this is a one-shot, simultaneously-move game, find all the Nash equilibria (pure and mixed). (-25,-4) Player B L (7,5) (1, 1) Q2. Consider this sequential game. Assume the players can only use pure strategies Drive Player 1 Player 2 Walk Run R (1, 1) (4, 10) Fly Walk Swim (10,0) (3,20) (2,10) (1,9) a. Use backward induction to solve for the subgame perfect Nash equilibrium.

Q1. Suppose player A and player B are playing the following game. Player A can choose "Up" and "Down", while player B can choose "Left" and "Right". The payoff matrix is depicted below. Player A's payoff is the first entry. Player B's payoff is the second entry. Player A U D Run a. Suppose this is a one-shot, simultaneously-move game, find all the Nash equilibria (pure and mixed). (-25,-4) Player B L (7,5) (1, 1) Q2. Consider this sequential game. Assume the players can only use pure strategies Drive Player 1 Player 2 Walk Run R (1, 1) (4, 10) Fly Walk Swim (10,0) (3,20) (2,10) (1,9) a. Use backward induction to solve for the subgame perfect Nash equilibrium.

Microeconomic Theory

12th Edition

ISBN:9781337517942

Author:NICHOLSON

Publisher:NICHOLSON

Chapter8: Game Theory

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 8.7P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

two players, a and b are playing an asymmetrical game. there are n points on the game board. each turn player a targets a pair of points and player b says whether those two points are connected or unconnected. a can target each pair only once and the game ends when all pairs have been targeted. player b wins if a point is connected with all other points on the very last turn, while player a wins if any point is connected with all other points on any turn but the very last one or if no point is connected to all other points after the last turn. for what values of n does either player have a winning strategy?
PLAYER B LEFT RIGHT UP 5 FOR A, 30 FOR B 10 FOR A, 12 FOR B PLAYER A DOWN -2 FOR A, 10 FOR B 8 FOR A, 15 FOR B In the above game, the players are seeking to maximize the number they recieve. They choose at the same time. What is the Nash equillibrium? Player A will choose UP and player B will choose LEFT Player A will UP and player B will choose RIGHT Player A will choose DOWN and player B will choose LEFT Player A will choose DOWN and player B will choose RIGHT Player A will choose LEFT and player B will choose UP Player A will choose LEFT and player B will choose DOWN Player A will choose RIGHT and player B will choose UP Player A will choose RIGHT and player B will choose DOWN
Suppose two players play a two-period repeated game, where the stage game is the normal-form game shown below. Is there a subgame perfect Nash equilibrium in which the players select (A, X) in the first period? If so, fully describe such equilibrium. If not, explain why not. Player 1 has choice A, B; Player 2 has choice X, Y, Z. Payoff: (A,X)-(5,7), (A,Y)-(2,4), (A,Z)-(3,8), (B,X)-(1,4), (B,Y)-(3,5), (B,Z)-(1,4)
Players 1, 2, and 3 are playing a game in which the strategy of player i isdenoted yi and can be any nonnegative real number. The payoff function for player 1 is V1(y1,y2,y3) = y1 + y1y2 - (y1)2,for player 2 is V2(y1,y2,y3) = y2 + y1y2 - (y2)2,and for player 3 is V3(y1,y2,y3) = (10 - y1 - y2 - y3)y3.These payoff functions are hill shaped. Find a Nash equilibrium. (Hint: Thepayoff functions are symmetric for players 1 and 2.)
Suppose that Teresa and Caroline are both in the public eye. They get offers to sell secrets of the other to tabloids. If both keep the secrets, they are both better off than if they get exposed. If only one is exposed, the other person is better off than if no one was exposed. Their payoffs from each option are given in the payoff matrix. Suppose that Caroline and Teresa play the game over four television seasons, where each season is a new game. Consider the scenarios. Remember, a tit‑for‑tat strategy is one where the person starts by cooperating and then plays whatever strategy the other firm played last. Over four seasons, how much will Caroline make if she and Teresa both play tit‑for‑tat? $_______ Over four seasons, how much does Caroline make if she always exposes and Teresa plays tit‑for‑tat? $________
Suppose that Teresa and Caroline are both in the public eye. They get offers to sell secrets of the other to tabloids. If both keep the secrets, they are both better off than if they get exposed. If only one is exposed, the other person is better off than if no one was exposed. Their payoffs from each option are given in the payoff matrix. Suppose that Caroline and Teresa play the game over four television seasons, where each season is a new game. Consider the scenarios. Remember, a tit‑for‑tat strategy is one where the person starts by cooperating and then plays whatever strategy the other firm played last. Over four seasons, how much will Caroline make if she plays a tit‑for‑tat strategy and Teresa always exposes? $_______ Over four seasons, how much will Caroline make if she and Teresa both always expose? $_________ Does Caroline have a dominant strategy when she and Teresa play for four seasons? No, there is no dominant strategy…
Suppose that Kim and Nene are both in the public eye. They get offers to sell secrets of the other to tabloids. If both keep the secrets, they are both better off than if they get exposed. If only one is exposed, the other person is better off than if no one was exposed. Their payoffs from each option are given in the payoff matrix. Suppose that Nene and Kim play the game over four television seasons, where each season is a new game. Consider the scenarios. Remember, a tit‑for‑tat strategy is one where the person starts by cooperating and then plays whatever strategy the other firm played last. Over four seasons, how much will Nene make if she and Kim both play tit‑for‑tat? $ Over four seasons, how much does Nene make if she always exposes and Kim plays tit‑for‑tat? $ Over four seasons, how much will Nene make if she plays a tit‑for‑tat strategy and Kim always exposes? $ Over four seasons, how much will Nene make if she and…
Consider the following game. There are two payers, Player 1 and Player 2. Player 1 chooses a row (10, 20, or 30), and Player 2 chooses a column (10/20/30). Payoffs are in the cells of the table, with those on the left going to Player 1 and those on the right going to player 2. Suppose that Player 1 chooses his strategy (10, 20 or 30), first, and subsequently, and after observing Player 1’s choice, Player 2 chooses his own strategy (of 10, 20 or 30). Which of the following statements is true regarding this modified game? I. It is a simultaneous move game, because the timing of moves is irrelevant in classifying games.II. It is a sequential move game, because Player 2 observes Player 1’s choice before he chooses his own strategy.III. This modification gives Player 1 a ‘first mover advantage’. A) I and IIB) II and IIIC) I and IIID) I onlyE) II only
Firm A Firm B Low Price High Price Low Price (2, 2) (10, −8) High Price (−8, 10) (15, 15) Suppose the game is infinitely repeated, and the interest rate is 10 percent. The firms are allowed to collude and make joint decisions. Both firms agree to charge a high price, provided no player has charged a low price in the past. This collusive outcome will be implemented with a trigger strategy that states that if any firm cheats (by charging a low price), then the agreement is no longer valid and each firm may make their own independent decisions. Will the trigger strategy be effective in implementing the collusive agreement? Please explain and show all necessary calculations.
if Y = 4 (a) If ⟨a,d⟩ is played in the first period and ⟨b,e⟩ is played in the second period, what is the resulting (repeated game) payoff for the row player? (b) What is the highest payoff any player can receive in any subgame perfect Nash equilibrium of the repeated game?
Consider the game shown below. In this game, players 1 and 2 must move at the same time without knowledge of the other player’s move. Player 1’s choices are shown in the row headings (A, B, C, D), Player 2’s choices are shown in the column headings (E, F, G). The first payoff is for the row player (Player1) and the second payoff is for the column player (Player 2). Player 2 Player 1 E F G A 2, 7 7, 2 2, 6 B 5, 5 5, 4 8, 4 C 4, 6 8, 4 7, 5 D 1, 6 3, 5 6, 4 Highlight the correct answer: Player 1: Has a dominant strategy to choose A Has a dominant strategy to choose B Has a dominant strategy to choose C Has a dominant strategy to choose D Does not have a dominant strategy Player 2: Has a dominant strategy to choose E Has a dominant strategy to choose F Has a dominant strategy to choose G Does not have a dominant strategy The Nash equilibrium outcome to this game is: A/F B/E B/G C/F C/G There is no pure strategy Nash…
Two players bargain over $20. Player 1 first proposes a split of(n, 20 - n), where n is an integer in {0, 1, ..., 20}. Player 2 can either accept or reject this proposal. If player accepts it, player 1 obtains $n and player 2 obtains $(20 - n). If player 2 rejects it, the money is taken away from them and both players will get $0. Question: Find two subgame perfect Nash equilibria of this game and state clearly each player's equilibrium strategies (recall that in a dynamic game, a player's strategy is a complete-contingent plan). Explain why the strategy profiles form a subgame perfect equilibrium.