Oligopoly/Game Theory-- Questions 21-25 refer to Table 6-1 below.Two home-improvement stores (Lopes and HomeMax) in a growing urban area are interested in expanding their market share. Both are interested inexpanding the size of their store and parking lot to accommodate potential growth in their customer base. The following game depicts the strategicoutcomes that result from the game. Increases in annual profits of the two home-improvement stores are shown in the table below.Table 6-1Profits for Lopes & HomeMax under different strategiesLopesIncrease the size of storeDo not increase the size ofand parking lotstore and parking lotLopes $1.0 millionHomeMax - $1.5 millionLopes - $0.4 millionHomeMax = $3.4 millionIncrease the size of store andparking lotHomeMaxLopes $3.2 millionHomeMax = $0.6 millionLopes $2.0 millionHomeMax - $2.5 millionDo not increase the sizeof store and parking lot Question 23Refer to Table 6-1 in Question 21. Increasing the size of its store and parking lot is a dominant strategy for.O HomeMax, but not for Lopes.O Lopes, but not for HomeMax.both stores.O neither store.

"A dominant strategy is the optimal strategy for a player among all the competitive strategies no…

Question 23 Refer to Table 6-1 in Question 21. Increasing the size of its store and parking lot is a dominant strategy for. O HomeMax, but not for Lopes. O Lopes, but not for HomeMax. O both stores. neither store.

Question 23 Refer to Table 6-1 in Question 21. Increasing the size of its store and parking lot is a dominant strategy for. O HomeMax, but not for Lopes. O Lopes, but not for HomeMax. O both stores. neither store.

Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach

5th Edition

ISBN:9781337106665

Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor

Publisher:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor

Chapter15: Strategic Games

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 3MC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Table 17-6 Two home - improvement stores (Lopes and HomeMax) in a growing urban area are interested in expanding their market share. Both are interested in expanding the size of their store and parking lot to accommodate potential growth in their customer base. The following game depicts the strategic outcomes that result from the game. Increases in annual profits (in millions of dollars) of the two home - improvement stores are shown in the following figure. Refer to Table 17-6. Increasing the size of its store and parking lot is a dominant strategy for Question 8 options: Lopes, but not for HomeMax. HomeMax, but not for Lopes. both stores. neither store.
Refer to the normal-form game of price competition in the payoff matrix below Firm B Low Price High Price Firm A Low Price 0, 0 50, −10 High Price −10, 50 20, 20 Suppose the game is infinitely repeated, and the interest rate is 20 percent. Both firms agree to charge a high price, provided no player has charged a low price in the past. This collusive outcome will be implemented with a trigger strategy that states that if any firm cheats, then the agreement is no longer valid, and each firm may make independent decisions. Will the trigger strategy be effective in implementing the collusive agreement? Please explain and show all necessary calculations.
Suppose Telkomsel and Indosat are the only two firms in the internet market. They face the following payoff when the want to invest in the research budget: When both companies invest in small budget, Telkomsel will gain Rp 40 billion and Indosat will gain Rp 50 billion. When both of them invest in large budget, Telkomsel will gain Rp 20 billion and Indosat will gain Rp 30 billion. When Telkomsel invest in large budget and Indosat in small budget, Telkomsel will gain Rp 30 billion and Indosat will gain zero. When Telkomsel invest in small budget and Indosat in large budget, Telkomsel will gain zero and Indosat will gain Rp 70 billion. a). Draw the payoff matrix b). Is there a Nash Equilibrium for that case? Explain.
Two firms compete in prices in a market for a homogeneous product. In this market there are N > 0 consumers; each buys one unit if the price of the product does not exceed $10, and nothing otherwise. Consumers buy from the firm selling at a lower price. In case both firms charge the same price, assume that N/2 consumers buy from each firm. Assume zero production cost for both firms. Find the Bertrand equilibrium prices for a single-shot game, assuming that the firms choose their prices simultaneously
Alcoa and Kaiser, duopolists in the market for primary aluminum ingot, choose prices of their 500 foot rolls of sheet aluminum on the first day of the month. The following payoff table shows their monthly payoffs resulting from the pricing decisions they can make. Suppose Alcoa and Kaiser repeat their pricing decision on the first day of every month. Suppose they have been cooperating for the past few months, but now the manager at Kaiser is trying to decide whether to cheat or to continue cooperating. Kaiser’s manager believes Kaiser can get away with cheating for two months, but he also believes that Kaiser would be punished for the next two months after cheating. After punishment, Kaiser’s manager expects the two firms would return to cooperation. Kaiser’s manager ignores the time-value of money and does not discount future benefits or costs. Will Kaiser cooperate or cheat? Explain.
Alcoa and Kaiser, duopolists in the market for primary aluminum ingot, choose prices of their 500 foot rolls of sheet aluminum on the first day of the month. The following payoff table shows their monthly payoffs resulting from the pricing decisions they can make. Suppose Alcoa and Kaiser repeat their pricing decision on the first day of every month. Suppose they have been cooperating for the past few months, but now the manager at Kaiser is trying to decide whether to cheat or to continue cooperating. Kaiser’s manager believes Kaiser can get away with cheating for two months, but he also believes that Kaiser would be punished for the next two months after cheating. After punishment, Kaiser’s manager expects the two firms would return to cooperation. Kaiser’s manager ignores the time-value of money and does not discount future benefits or costs. 4. Suppose you were asked to manage a golf course that was currently charging a uniform price. Would you suggest that the course continue…
Alcoa and Kaiser, duopolists in the market for primary aluminum ingot, choose prices of their 500 foot rolls of sheet aluminum on the first day of the month. The following payoff table shows their monthly payoffs resulting from the pricing decisions they can make. Suppose Alcoa and Kaiser repeat their pricing decision on the first day of every month. Suppose they have been cooperating for the past few months, but now the manager at Kaiser is trying to decide whether to cheat or to continue cooperating. Kaiser’s manager believes Kaiser can get away with cheating for two months, but he also believes that Kaiser would be punished for the next two months after cheating. After punishment, Kaiser’s manager expects the two firms would return to cooperation. Kaiser’s manager ignores the time-value of money and does not discount future benefits or costs. What is the monthly gain to Kaiser from cheating? What is the present value of the benefit from cheating for the two months of cheating?
Alcoa and Kaiser, duopolists in the market for primary aluminum ingot, choose prices of their 500 foot rolls of sheet aluminum on the first day of the month. The following payoff table shows their monthly payoffs resulting from the pricing decisions they can make. Suppose Alcoa and Kaiser repeat their pricing decision on the first day of every month. Suppose they have been cooperating for the past few months, but now the manager at Kaiser is trying to decide whether to cheat or to continue cooperating. Kaiser’s manager believes Kaiser can get away with cheating for two months, but he also believes that Kaiser would be punished for the next two months after cheating. After punishment, Kaiser’s manager expects the two firms would return to cooperation. What is the monthly cost of punishment to Kaiser? What is the present value of the cost of cheating for the two months of punishment?
Assuming there are two companies selling personal computers,Company Jackfruit Computers and Company Mangoes Computer. They both have an inventory of personal computers that they would like to sell before a new generation of faster, cheaper machines is introduced. The question facing each competitor is whether or not they should widely advertise a “close out” sale on these discontinued items, or instead let excess inventory work itself off over the next few months. The net revenue to each firm in millions of $, is depicted in the payoff matrixbelow: Mangoes Jackfruit Advertise Don’t advertise Advertise M: $5 J: $5 M: $2 J: $20 Don’t advertise M: $20 J: $2 M: $10 J: $10 1. Determine the dominant strategy for each firm 2. Would collusion work in this case? Explain.
Table A shows the pricing options for two drone operators, Andrew and Jasmine, as an oligopoly in a local market. Which of the following pricing strategy scenarios does Table 2 depict, when there are at least two pricing periods expected? Table A Drone Operator Andrew LOW Price Drone Operator Andrew HIGH Price Drone Operator Jasmine LOW Price Drone Operator Andrew Charges LOW Price: gets $1,000 profit Drone Operator Jasmine Charges LOW Price: gets $1,000 profit Drone Operator Andrew Charges HIGH Price: gets $0 profit Drone Operator Jasmine Charges LOW Price: gets $2,000 profit Drone Operator Jasmine HIGH Price Drone Operator Andrew Charges LOW Price: gets $2,000 profit Drone Operator Jasmine Charges HIGH Price: gets $0 profit Drone Operator Andrew Charges HIGH Price: gets $1,500 profit Drone Operator Jasmine Charges HIGH Price: gets $1,500 profit Table 2 Pricing Strategy Scenario TABLE 2 First Period Price Choice (High or Low) First Period Profit Second Period…
Boeing and Airbus have to decide whether to invest in the development of a Super Jumbo for long distance travel; if they both develop successfully the new plane, their profits will drop by 50 millions a year; if only one develop the Super Jumbo, it will make 80 millions a year in additional profits, whereas the profits of the other firm will drop by 30 millions a year; if no firm develops the plane, nothing changes. Based on giveninformation, construct Matrix Representation of Boeing and Airbus Companies game
For the game in FIGURE 7.6, derive players’ best-reply functions, plot them as shown in Figure 7.5, and find the Nash equilibrium.