Representing a large auto dealer, a buyer attends car auctions. To help with the bidding, the buyer built a regression equation to predict the resale value of cars purchased at the auction. The equation is given below. Estimated Resale Price ($) = 20,000 - 2,050 Age (year), with ? = 0.46 and s, = $3,300 Use this information to complete parts (a) through (c) below. (a) Which is more predictable: the resale value of one two-year-old car, or the average resale value of a collection of 16 cars, all of which are two years old? O A. The average of the 16 cars is more predictable by default because it is impossible to predict the value of a single observation. O B. The resale value of one two-year-old car is more predictable because only one car will contribute to the error. OC. The average of the 16 cars is more predictable because the averages have less variation. O D. The resale value of one two-year-old car is more predictable because a single observation has no variation. (b) According the buyer's equation, what is the estimated resale value of a two-year-old car? The average resale value of a collection of 16 cars, each two years old? The estimated resale value of a two-year-old car is $. (Type an integer or a decimal. Do not round.) The average resale value of a collection of 16 cars, each two years old is $. (Type an integer or a decimal. Do not round.) (c) Could the prediction from this equation overestimate or underestimate the resale price of a car by more than $2,250? O A. No. Since $2,250 is less than the standard error of $3,300, it is impossible for the regression equation to be off by more than $2,250. O B. Yes. Since $2,250 is less than the standard error of $3,300, it is quite possible that the regression equation will be off by more than $2,250. OC. Yes. Since $2,250 is greater than the absolute value of the predicted slope, $2,050, it is quite possible that the regression equation will be off by more than $2,250. OD. No. Since $2,250 is greater than the absolute value of the predicted slope, $2,050, it is impossible for the regression equation to be off by more than $2,250.

Functions and Change: A Modeling Approach to College Algebra (MindTap Course List)
6th Edition
ISBN:9781337111348
Author:Bruce Crauder, Benny Evans, Alan Noell
Publisher:Bruce Crauder, Benny Evans, Alan Noell
Chapter3: Straight Lines And Linear Functions
Section3.CR: Chapter Review Exercises
Problem 16CR: XYZ Corporation Stock Prices The following table shows the average stock price, in dollars, of XYZ...
icon
Related questions
icon
Concept explainers
Question
Representing a large auto dealer, a buyer attends car auctions. To help with the bidding, the buyer built a regression equation to predict the resale value of cars purchased at the auction. The equation is given below.
Estimated Resale Price ($) = 20,000 – 2,050 Age (year), with r2 =0.46 and
Se
= $3,300
Use this information to complete parts (a) through (c) below.
(a) Which is more predictable: the resale value of one two-year-old car, or the average resale value of a collection of 16 cars, all of which are two years old?
O A. The average of the 16 cars is more predictable by default because it is impossible to predict the value of a single observation.
O B. The resale value of one two-year-old car is more predictable because only one car will contribute to the error.
OC. The average of the 16 cars is more predictable because the averages have less variation.
O D. The resale value of one two-year-old car is more predictable because a single observation has no variation.
(b) According the buyer's equation, what is the estimated resale value of a two-year-old car? The average resale value of a collection of 16 cars, each two years old?
The estimated resale value of a two-year-old car is $.
(Type an integer or a decimal. Do not round.)
The average resale value of a collection of 16 cars, each two years old is $
(Type an integer or a decimal. Do not round.)
(c) Could the prediction from this equation overestimate or underestimate the resale price of a car by more than $2,250?
O A. No. Since $2,250 is less than the standard error of $3,300, it is impossible for the regression equation to be off by more than $2,250.
O B. Yes. Since $2,250 is less than the standard error of $3,300, it is quite possible that the regression equation will be off by more than $2,250.
O C. Yes. Since $2,250 is greater than the absolute value of the predicted slope, $2,050, it is quite possible that the regression equation will be off by more than $2,250.
O D. No. Since $2,250 is greater than the absolute value of the predicted slope, $2,050, it is impossible for the regression equation to be off by more than $2,250.
Transcribed Image Text:Representing a large auto dealer, a buyer attends car auctions. To help with the bidding, the buyer built a regression equation to predict the resale value of cars purchased at the auction. The equation is given below. Estimated Resale Price ($) = 20,000 – 2,050 Age (year), with r2 =0.46 and Se = $3,300 Use this information to complete parts (a) through (c) below. (a) Which is more predictable: the resale value of one two-year-old car, or the average resale value of a collection of 16 cars, all of which are two years old? O A. The average of the 16 cars is more predictable by default because it is impossible to predict the value of a single observation. O B. The resale value of one two-year-old car is more predictable because only one car will contribute to the error. OC. The average of the 16 cars is more predictable because the averages have less variation. O D. The resale value of one two-year-old car is more predictable because a single observation has no variation. (b) According the buyer's equation, what is the estimated resale value of a two-year-old car? The average resale value of a collection of 16 cars, each two years old? The estimated resale value of a two-year-old car is $. (Type an integer or a decimal. Do not round.) The average resale value of a collection of 16 cars, each two years old is $ (Type an integer or a decimal. Do not round.) (c) Could the prediction from this equation overestimate or underestimate the resale price of a car by more than $2,250? O A. No. Since $2,250 is less than the standard error of $3,300, it is impossible for the regression equation to be off by more than $2,250. O B. Yes. Since $2,250 is less than the standard error of $3,300, it is quite possible that the regression equation will be off by more than $2,250. O C. Yes. Since $2,250 is greater than the absolute value of the predicted slope, $2,050, it is quite possible that the regression equation will be off by more than $2,250. O D. No. Since $2,250 is greater than the absolute value of the predicted slope, $2,050, it is impossible for the regression equation to be off by more than $2,250.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps with 1 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Correlation, Regression, and Association
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
Functions and Change: A Modeling Approach to Coll…
Functions and Change: A Modeling Approach to Coll…
Algebra
ISBN:
9781337111348
Author:
Bruce Crauder, Benny Evans, Alan Noell
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Algebra and Trigonometry (MindTap Course List)
Algebra and Trigonometry (MindTap Course List)
Algebra
ISBN:
9781305071742
Author:
James Stewart, Lothar Redlin, Saleem Watson
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill
College Algebra
College Algebra
Algebra
ISBN:
9781305115545
Author:
James Stewart, Lothar Redlin, Saleem Watson
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
College Algebra
College Algebra
Algebra
ISBN:
9781938168383
Author:
Jay Abramson
Publisher:
OpenStax