Question

Transcribed Image Text:1. Stable sorting algorithms maintain the relative order of records with equal keys (i.e. values). That is, a
sorting algorithm is stable if whenever there are two records R and S with the same key (i.e. value) and
with R appearing before S in the original list, R will appear before S in the sorted list.
Consider Insertion Sort, Merge Sort, Quick Sort. Which of these is not a stable sorting algorithm?
Justify your answer.
Expert Solution

This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by stepSolved in 3 steps

Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Suppose that you sort a large array of integers by using mergesort. Next you use a binary search to determine whether a given integer occurs in the array. Finally, you display all the integers in the sorted array. Which algorithm is faster, in general: the mergesort or the binary search? Justify your answer. Which algorithm is faster, in general: the binary search or displaying the integers? Justify your answer.arrow_forwardStable sorting algorithms maintain the relative order of records with equalkeys (i.e. values). That is, a sorting algorithm is stable if whenever there aretwo records R and S with the same key and with R appearing before S in theoriginal list, R will appear before S in the sorted list. Is Counting-sort stable? please explain and answer this!arrow_forwardA corporation is attempting to expand its employee mental health and wellness initiative via an awareness campaign and is anticipating that up to four times as many employees will participate next year compared to the previous year. The Human Resources director will eventually need to be able to check whether a given employee has signed up, which means searching through the list of everyone who is participating in the campaign. Assuming the list is sorted and the HR director is using binary search, what will be the effect on the number of operations in the worst case if the list is four times longer than before? The number of operations will not change. O This will require two more operations. This will require twice as many operations. O This will require four times as many operations. A factory is planning on manufacturing a vehicle that gives customers the following assistive device customization features: (a) an optional ramp for wheelchair acess, (b) either a hand control or foot…arrow_forward
- Pls answer correctly and show all workarrow_forwardThe Big O of the linear search is O(n) and of the binary search is O(log n). What key aspectof both the binary search (Chapter 6) and the merge sort accounts for the logarithmic portion oftheir respective Big Os?arrow_forwardWe talked about the trade-off between using sequential search on an unsorted list as opposed to sorting the list and then using binary search. If the list size is n = 9,000, about how many worst-case searches must be done before the second alternative is better in terms of number of comparisons? (Hint: Let p represent the number of searches done.) Use selection search to sort the binary search list.arrow_forward
- Follow these steps every time it has to identify two arrays to merge in order to develop a bottom-up mergesort that takes use of the order of the arrays: To make a sorted subarray, locate the first item of an array that is smaller than its predecessor, then the second, and so on. Consider the array size and the number of maximal ascending sequences in the array when calculating the execution time of this method.arrow_forward6. Below is a table that shows the timing of three different algorithms using an array of integers as input. Explain which of the algorithms is most likely the selection sort and which is the merge sort, explain in details your answer. Algorithm 1 Algorithm 2 Algorithm 3 time to process 2000 integers 0.1431 sec 0.8011 sec 0.0132 sec time to process 4000 integers 0.5722 sec 1.4300 sec 0.0304 sec time to process 8000 integers 2.2989 sec 2.4512 sec 0.0634 secarrow_forwardt/farrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
arrow_forward_ios