Suppose that you have the following information, Cache capacity= 32KB, Cache block capacity = 4B, Main memory capacity 4MB. Based on this information, find the address structure of cache using %3! direct mapping algorithm. Show your work.

Suppose that you have the following information, Cache capacity= 32KB, Cache block capacity = 4B, Main memory capacity 4MB. Based on this information, find the address structure of cache using %3! direct mapping algorithm. Show your work.

Name: Suppose that you have the following information, Cache capacity= 32KB
Uploaded: 2024-03-20T06:51:23.000Z
Channel: Bartleby
Description: Suppose that you have the following information, Cache capacity= 32KB, Cache block capacity = 4B,Main memory capacity = 4MB. Based on this information, find the address structure of cache usingdirect mapping algorithm. Show your work.

Systems Architecture

7th Edition

ISBN:9781305080195

Author:Stephen D. Burd

Publisher:Stephen D. Burd

Chapter6: System Integration And Performance

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 22VE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

If we have to design a 4 - way set - associative cache of 8 MB size that could work for a main memory of size 4 GB , determine the following : 1. The total number of cache locations 2. The size of tag Consider the cache block size as 4 bytes . Note:- Here he want the number of cache locations And, the size of tag show all the steps.
Explore the concept of cache memory in-depth. How do cache levels (L1, L2, L3) work, and what strategies are employed to improve cache hit rates and reduce cache misses?
How many total bits are required for a direct-mapped cache with 2^12 blocks (12-bit index), two-word in each block, assuming 64-bit address? Compare this total cache size with the 2^13 words for storage of data as given above.
Consider a main memory with size 512MB with cache size 64KB and memory block is 4 bytes. Assume that the memory word is 1 byte . Answer following question How many address bits are required ti address the main memory locations ? How many blocks are there in the cache memory? Determine how to split the address (s-r, d ,w )for direct mapping? Determine how to split the address (s-d, d ,w )for set associative mapping .Assume each cache set is 4 line of cache
Consider a main memory with size 128 Mbytes with cache size 64 Kbytes and memory block is 4 bytes. Determine how to split the address (s-d, d, w) for set associative mapping. Assume each cache set is 2 lines of cache.
Assume a fully associative cache of size 32kiB and block size of 64Bytes. Determine: i) the number of cache blocks. ii) the number of bits required for the cache block offset. iii) the number of Tag bits
1. For a direct-mapped cache design with a 32-bit address, the following bits of address are used to access the cache. Tag Index Offset 31-14 13-7 6-0 a. What is the cache block size (in words)? b. How many entries does this cache have? c. What is the ratio between total bits required for such a cache implementation over the data storage bits?
Explain why a cache replacement technique for all address sequences is challenging.
What are some of the challenges involved in creating a cache replacement approach that works for all address sequences?
Please explain the question below Objective: Show the influence of the cache size on the miss rate Development Configure a system with the following architectural characteristics: Processors in SMP = 1 Cache coherence protocol = MESI Scheme for bus arbitration = Random Word wide (bits) = 16 Words by block = 16 (block size = 32 bytes) Blocks in main memory = 8192 (main memory size = 256 KB) Mapping = Fully-Associative Replacement policy = LRU Configure the blocks in cache using the following configurations: 2(cache size = 0,03 KB), 4,8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, and 512 (cache size = 16 KB). For each of the configurations, obtain the miss rate using the trace files: Hydro, Naasa7, Cexp, Comp, and Wave. Are there conflict misses in these experiments? Why? In these cases, it may be observed that for great cache sizes, the miss rate is stabilized. Why? We can also see great differences in miss rate for a concrete increment of cache size. What do these great differences indicate?
Explain why it is difficult to devise a suitable cache replacement technique for all address sequences.
A cache designer wants to increase the size of a 4 KiB virtually indexed, physically tagged cache. Given the page size shown above, is it possible to make a 16 KiB direct-mapped cache, assuming 2 words per block? How would the designer increase the data size of the cache?