The payoff matrix of economic profits, below, displays the possible outcomes for Coles (C) and Woolworth (W who are involved in a game of whether to implement or not implement new warehouse technologies. The payoff: in dollars are indicated in the matrix below, and the companies are unable to communicate with each other. Coles (C) Implement Not Implement C: $30 million C: $10 million Implement W: $30 million W: $30 million Woolworth (W) C: $20 million C: $10 million Not Implement W: $10 million W: $20 million (a) With reference to the payoff matrix, work out whether each company has a dominant strategy and what tha dominant strategy is, if it exists. (b) Explain with reference to the above scenario, what the Nash Equilibrium is, if there is any? (c) Is this a Prisoner's dilemma game? Explain why or why not.

The payoff matrix of economic profits, below, displays the possible outcomes for Coles (C) and Woolworth (W who are involved in a game of whether to implement or not implement new warehouse technologies. The payoff: in dollars are indicated in the matrix below, and the companies are unable to communicate with each other. Coles (C) Implement Not Implement C: $30 million C: $10 million Implement W: $30 million W: $30 million Woolworth (W) C: $20 million C: $10 million Not Implement W: $10 million W: $20 million (a) With reference to the payoff matrix, work out whether each company has a dominant strategy and what tha dominant strategy is, if it exists. (b) Explain with reference to the above scenario, what the Nash Equilibrium is, if there is any? (c) Is this a Prisoner's dilemma game? Explain why or why not.

Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies and Tactics (MindTap Course List)

14th Edition

ISBN:9781305506381

Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris

Publisher:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris

Chapter15A: Auction Design And Information Economics

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 10E

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

14. Company A and Company B are each telecommunications manufacturers. Both companies manufacture the same products, and they make their decisions based on the other's actions. Both companies are considering opening retail outlets to increase their profits. The payoff matrix shows the profits of the companies in millions of dollars if they choose to open retail outlets. The government imposes a new $5 million tax to open retail outlets. What is the expected outcome of the new payoff matrix, given the tax? The Nash equilibrium is for Company A to not open retail outlets and for Company B to open retail outlets. The Nash equilibrium is for Company A to open retail outlets and for Company B to not open retail outlets. The Nash equilibrium is for both Company A and Company B to open retail outlets. The Nash equilibrium is for both Company A and Company B to not open retail outlets. There is no Nash equilibrium after the change given in the scenario.…
Two rival communications companies (Alpha and Beta) are both considering bringing out a revolutionary 8G wireless technology. Unfortunately, the costs of development are so high that the potential market could only support one firm. Both companies understand these possible outcomes. If one firm enters the 8G market and the other does not, the entering firm will receive $500 billion in profits over the next 5 years; the other firm will receive $100 billion over the same 5 years (by concentrating on their current 5G service). If neither enters the 8G field, they can both expect to receive $75 billion over the 5-year period, as they fight over the 5G market. Lastly, if both enter the 8G market, each will end up suffering a $50 billion loss over the same 5 years. Use a game table with “ENTER” and “STAY OUT” to decide each player’s options and the payoffs. Explain why each company has a strong reason to want to announce its intentions before the other company announces theirs.
3. Describe some interaction your company has with another entity (firms producing complementary or substitute products, upstream sup- pliers, or downstream customers), or between internal divisions within your firm that can be described as a sequential or simultaneous game. Diagram the strategies, players, and compute payoffs as best you can. Compute the Nash equilibria. What can you do to change the rules of the game to your advantage? Compute the profit consequences of your advice.
Game Theory a) Consider the following game represented by the game tree below. If you observe Blue Bank playing medium and Green Bank playing bottom, would you be surprised by their choices? Carefully explain why or why not. b) Now assume that Blue and Green Banks play the game with the same actions and payoffs as in a) but they make their choices simultaneously. What is the payoff matrix for this new game? What do you predict will happen in the game? Explain. c) Assume that the game from part a) is played five times, i.e. Blue and Green Banks play a repeated game with the stage game described in a). What do you predict will happen in the game? Explain.
4). The following is a payoff matrix showing profit in millions of dollars when two companies simultaneously decide on various advertising budgets ($1 million, $2 million, or $3 million): a. In the first round of strategy elimination (when all three possible budgets are under consideration), which ad budget would the companies exclude? b. After the first round of elimination (previous question), would either company make a second-round elimination? c. What would be the likely outcome of this simultaneous advertising decision (i.e. what ad budget would each company end up choosing)?
5 Suppose there are only two electric vehicle producers–Tesla and BMW. Using game theory in microeconomics, explain whether BMWand Tesla willdesign the same charge plug or different plug. What factors should the firms take into consideration?
A) Focus on the strategic game at the lower-right side of the gametree. Find all the Nash equilibria for this subgame, including the mixed-strategyones. (b) Find all the subgame perfect equilibria for the entire game, allowingfor both pure and mixed strategies
Suppose Toyota and Honda must decide whether to make a new breed of side-impact airbags standard equipment on all models. Side-impact airbags raise the price of each automobile by $1,000. If both firms make side-impact airbags standard equipment, each company will earn profits of $0.5 billion. If neither company adopts the side-impact airbag technology, each company will earn $1.5 billion. If one company adopts the technology as standard equipment and the other does not, the adopting company will earn a profit of $2 billion and the other company will earn $-1 billion.If you were a decision maker at Honda, would you make side-impact airbags standard equipment?multiple choice 1 There is not enough information to answer the question. No Yes If Toyota and Honda were able to cooperate, would you expect this same outcome?multiple choice 2 Yes No There is not enough information to answer the question.
q52 If you advertise and your rival advertises, you each will earn 14 million in profits. If neither of you advertises, you will each earn 20 million in profits. However, if one of you advertises and the other does not, the firm that advertises will earn 10 million and the non-advertising firm will earn 16 million. If you and your rival plan to be in business for only one year, the Nash equilibrium is a. for each firm to advertise. b. for the other firm to advertise and your firm not to advertise. c. for your firm to advertise and the other not to advertise. d. for neither firm to advertise.
a) Derive a bid-rent function for a "typical" firm. Draw a graph of the bid-rent function that is clearly labeled, including any intercepts or slopes.b) For a typical city, discuss what types of firms you are likely to see closest to downtown, and what types of firms you are likely to see further away. Do these firm locationsfit the model? Why or why not?c) Are these firms likely to change locations after covid? Why or why not?.
Answer all questions, show all working. Consider the following game in strategic or normal form. A2 B2 C2 A1 1,0 1,2 -2,1 B1 6,2 0,3 2,3 C1 2,2 -2,1 2,3 Use the iterative elimination of strictly dominated strategies to reduce the game as much as possible. What is the set of rationalizable strategies for each player? What is/are Nash equilibrium(s) in this game? Explain the differences between cooperative and non- cooperative games. What are the fundamental hypotheses about the behavior of the persons in Game theory?
The U.S. government has decided to build a new off ramp for Interstate 5 in California. Exxon and Shell are both interested in building a gas station near the new off ramp. They can build the gas station near the off ramp for northbound traffic or they could build the gas station near the off ramp for southbound traffic. The profits for each outcome are illustrated in the accompanying payoff table: Shellnorthbound Shellsouthbound Exxon northbound Exxon receives$60,000 profitShell receives$50,000 profit Exxon receives$110,000 profitShell receives$100,000 profit Exxonsouthbound Exxon receives$80,000 profitShell receives$120,000 profit Exxon receives$50,000 profitShell receives$50,000 profit a. Select the Nash equilibrium, or equilibria, that occur if Exxon and Shell make these decisions simultaneously. Exxon builds northbound and Shell builds northbound. Exxon builds southbound and Shell builds northbound. Exxon builds southbound and Shell builds southbound.…