Under what circumstances might an equal allocation of abatement responsibility across all firms in an industry do a pretty good job of achieving a desired overall level of abatement at the lowest overall cost, without the need to resort to market-based methods such as pollution taxes or cap-and-trade?

Under what circumstances might an equal allocation of abatement responsibility across all firms in an industry do a pretty good job of achieving a desired overall level of abatement at the lowest overall cost, without the need to resort to market-based methods such as pollution taxes or cap-and-trade?

Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies and Tactics (MindTap Course List)

14th Edition

ISBN:9781305506381

Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris

Publisher:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris

Chapter17: Long-term Investment Analysis

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1.2CE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Suppose that under the United States-Canada Air Quality Agreement, both countries agree to a combined 30 percent SO2 abatement standard. Further assume that the following SO2 abatement cost functions have been estimated by each country: TACUS = 500 + 1.5(AUS)2 MACUS = 3 AUS TACCAN = 1000 + 3(ACAN)2 MACCAN = 6 ACAN A. If the countries implement a uniform abatement standard, find the resulting values of TAC and MAC for each nation. Based on these values, is there an economic incentive the two nations to participate in an emissions trading program? Explain. B. Assuming a trading program is enacted, find the cost savings associated with a cost-effective abatement solution? C. What must be the price of a tradeable permit to achieve the cost-effective abatement allocation?
How does a cap-and-trade program deliver a minimum-overall-cost allocation of abatement responsibility? How is required abatement for each firm dictated within a cap-and-trade program? What information is conveyed by the equilibrium price of the permits being traded? How have recent cap-and-trade programs been modified to prevent market disruptions from resulting in either price spikes or extremely low prices?
For each of the policy objectives listed, identify each as a product of either financial incentives governments provide or the system of intellectual property that governments uphold. Some objectives may not be supported by governments at all. Financial Incentives Intellectual Property Fund basis research Make research and development less risky for private firms Ensure that inventors are rewarded for making useful inventions Transfer a significant share of new inventions under government control Prevent inventors from creating redundant inventions Ensure that inventors are the only beneficiaries of their invention's benefits.
Imagine a firm with a marginal abatement cost (MAC) function equal to: MAC = 45 - 5E. The government introduces a per-unit tax on emissions equal to $10. For a profit-maximizing firm, total compliance costs (total abatement costs plus tax payment) are $____.
The marginal benefit of being able to emit a ton of sulfur dioxide emissions for two firms are given by:MBX = 1000 – ( Ex / 2 )MBY = 600 – ( Ey / 3 ) Note that these marginal benefit figures can be interpreted as marginal cost of abating emission down to levels Ex and Ey.Government regulators want to reduce total sulfur dioxide emissions to a total of 1800 tons.a) If the government imposes the same standard of 900 tons maximum emissions on both firms what would be the total cost of abatement (calculated as the aggregated marginal benefits forgone)? b) If the government distributed 900 tradable pollution permits (one ton each) to each firm what would be the final allocation of these permits after the firms trade them?c) What would be the total cost of abatement in this latter case?
Respond to the question with a concise and accurate answer, along with a clear explanation and step-by-step solution, or risk receiving a downvote. n the table below are the marginal abatement costs of two firms. Note that an entry in the table indicates the cost of reducing emissions by one unit from the previous level. For example, $104 is the additional abatement cost for Firm 1 to reduce its emissions from 3 tons to 2 tons, and $40 is the cost for Firm 2 to reduce its emissions from 7 tons to 6 tons. 1.In an unregulated environment each firm produces 10 tons of emissions (20 tons total). Using the table above, what emissions levels (i.e., emissions standards) would you assign if you wanted to limit aggregate emissions to 7 tons in a cost-effective manner? Firm 1’s emissions level ________________ Firm 2’s emissions level ________________ 2.Given the emissions levels from Question 1, calculate the total abatement cost for each firm? Firm 1’s total abatement cost ________________…
The cost of reducing lead contamination of water for BigManufacture Inc. is shown in the table below. BigManufacture Inc currently releases lead in to the local waterways at a concentration of 5 parts per billion. The government regulations sets a limit to the lead pollution at 2 parts per billion accompanied by a $30,000 fine per year for each part per billion beyond the 2 part limit. What is BigManufacture Inc likely to do? Reduction of Lead Cost By 1 part per billion $20,000/year By 2 parts per billion $45,000/year By 3 parts per billion $80,000/year Group of answer choices Reduce lead pollution by 1 part per billion. Reduce lead pollution by 2 parts per billion. Reduce lead pollution by 0 part per billion. Reduce lead pollution by 3 parts per billion.
The costs of producing steel have declined substantially from building a conventional hot-rolled steel mill down to the new minimill technology that requires only scrap metal, an electric furnace, and 300 workers rather than iron ore raw materials, enormous blast furnaces, rolling mills, reheating furnaces, and thousands of workers. What effect on the potential industry profitability would Porter’s Five Forces framework suggest this new technology had? Why?
“Competition authorities in the world over have observably expanded their consideration of transactions fromapplying a purely competition-focused lens to one that incorporates the broader needs of society. ManyAfrican merger control regimes have developed a competition policy approach that balances traditionalcompetition law considerations with public interest concerns, especially in terms of market concentration,access to competitive markets for small and medium enterprises and employment considerations”.The economic problem being described above is ____ which can be solved through _____.A. Hyperinflation; fiscal policy measures.B. Unemployment; monetary policy adjustments.C. Market failure; enforcing antitrust laws and consumer protection regulations.D. Budget deficits; supply-side economic policies.
Consider the carbon tax in British Columbia that was imposed in 2008. Suppose that the regulator evaluated aggregate emissions levels a couple of years into the program and aggregate emissions were higher than predicted. Describe a potential reason for this in terms of the regulator’s beliefs about the marginal abatement costs of the regulated firms.
The DeBeers Company of South Africa was able to block competition through economies of scale. ownership of an essential input. government-imposed barriers. differentiating its product.
What factors are critical to the success of Dar's efforts to revive ICRISAT?