Assume the following hypothetical situation:A company is being sued for negligent hiring. They hired an employee who at the time of recruitment disclosed verbally and stated in writing about their prior drug addiction. They have successfully completed a rehab program.Was this a negligent hire? Why or why not?If the employee came to work one day under the influence but no one noticed and the employee ran a hand truck into a customer causing injuries, was this a negligent hire? Why or why not?Ignoring the information from Question B, how do you reconcile not hiring a recovering addict for safety concerns with this from the EEOC? "Current illegal drug use is not protected, but recovering addicts are protected under the ADA." According to the EEOC's manual, "Persons addicted to drugs, but who are no longer using drugs illegally and are receiving treatment for drug addiction or who have been rehabilitated successfully, are protected by the ADA from discrimination on the basis of past drug addiction."

1) This did not at all involve a negligent hiring decision. The employer verified the employee's…

Answered: Was this a negligent hire? Why or why…

Practical Management Science

6th Edition

ISBN:9781337406659

Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.

Publisher:WINSTON, Wayne L.

Chapter2: Introduction To Spreadsheet Modeling

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 20P: Julie James is opening a lemonade stand. She believes the fixed cost per week of running the stand...

See similar textbooks

Related questions

Question

100%

Assume the following hypothetical situation:

A company is being sued for negligent hiring. They hired an employee who at the time of recruitment disclosed verbally and stated in writing about their prior drug addiction. They have successfully completed a rehab program.

Was this a negligent hire? Why or why not?
If the employee came to work one day under the influence but no one noticed and the employee ran a hand truck into a customer causing injuries, was this a negligent hire? Why or why not?
Ignoring the information from Question B, how do you reconcile not hiring a recovering addict for safety concerns with this from the EEOC? "Current illegal drug use is not protected, but recovering addicts are protected under the ADA." According to the EEOC's manual, "Persons addicted to drugs, but who are no longer using drugs illegally and are receiving treatment for drug addiction or who have been rehabilitated successfully, are protected by the ADA from discrimination on the basis of past drug addiction."

Expert Solution

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

SEE SOLUTION Check out a sample Q&A here

Knowledge Booster

Learn more about

Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, operations-management and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.

Similar questions