Creating menus to influence others. Refer to the Journal of Consumer Research (March 2003) study on influencing the choices of others by offering undesirable alternatives, Exercise 7.80(p. 402). In another experiment conducted by the researcher, 96 subjects were asked to imagine that they had just moved to an apartment with two others and that they were shopping for a new appliance (e.g.. television, microwave oven). Each subject was asked to create a menu of three brand choices for their roommates; then subjects were randomly assigned (in equal numbers) to one of three different “goal'’ conditions—(1) create the menu in order to influence roommates to buy a preselected brand, (2) create the menu in order to influence roommates to buy a brand of your choice, and (3) create the menu with no intent to influence roommates The researcher theorized that the menus created to influence others would likely include undesirable alternative brands. Consequently the number of menus in each goal condition that was consistent with the theory was determined. The data are summarized in the table below. Analyze the data for the purpose of determining whether the proportion of subjects who selected menus consistent with the theory depends on goal condition. Use α = .01.
Goal Condition | Number Consistent with Theory | Number Not Consistent with Theory | Totals |
Influence/preselected brand | 15 | 17 | 32 |
Influence/own brand | 14 | 18 | 32 |
No influence | 3 | 29 | 32 |
Source: Based on R W Hamilton, “Why Do People Suggest What They Do Not Want? Using Context Effects to Influence Others’ Choices,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol 29. No 4, March 2003 (Table 2). |
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 10 Solutions
Statistics For Business And Economics, Student Value Edition Plus Mystatlab With Pearson Etext -- Access Card Package (13th Edition)
- In a study of whether taking a garlic supplement reduces the risk of getting a cold, participants were assigned to either a garlic supplement group or to a group that did not take a garlic supplement.† Based on the study, it was concluded that the proportion of people taking a garlic supplement who get a cold is lower than the proportion of those not taking a garlic supplement who get a cold. Do you think that the study was conducted in a reasonable way? What additional information would you want in order to evaluate this study? (Select all that apply.) A) whether the patients knew which treatment they were receiving B) whether the patients were randomly assigned to the treatments C) whether the patient's last name started with A through M D) whether the patient's cold lasted more than a week E) whether the experiment was conducted on a sufficient number of patients so that the differences observed could not be attributed to chancearrow_forwardIn a study examining the effect of humor on interpersonal attractions, McGee and Shevlin (2009) foundthat a man’s sense of humor had a significant effect onhow he was perceived by women. In the study, femalecollege students were given brief descriptions of a potential romantic partner and then rated the attractivenessof the male on a scale from 1 (low) to 7 (high). Thefictitious male was described positively as being single,ambitious, and having good job prospects. In one condition, the description also said that he had a great senseof humor. The results showed that the description wasrated significantly higher when “a sense of humor” wasincluded. To further examine this effect, a researcherselected a sample of n = 16 college males and askedthem to read a brief description of a female and thenrate the attractiveness of the woman in the description.The description had been used in previous research butwas modified by adding a statement describing a goodsense of humor. Based on the…arrow_forwardIn studies examining the effect of humor on interpersonal attractions, McGee and Shevlin (2009) found that an individual’s sense of humor had a significant effect on how the individual was perceived by others. In one part of the study, female college students were given brief descriptions of a potential romantic partner. The fictitious male was described positively as being single and ambitious and having good job prospects. For one group of participants, the description also said that he had a great sense of humor. For another group, it said that he has no sense of humor. After reading the description, each participant was asked to rate the attractiveness of the man on a seven-point scale from 1 (very unattractive) to 7 (very attractive). A score of 4 indicates a neutral rating. The females who read the “great sense of humor” description gave the potential partner an average attractiveness score of M = 4.53 with a standard deviation of s = 1.04. If the sample consisted of n = 16…arrow_forward
- The marketing department of ABC Ltd is interested in assessing whether those people who currently buy cars from a rival do so because they view ABC’s cars as being of poor quality. In carrying out a survey, the marketing department asked 200 people two questions. Firstly, have you purchased a car from ABC in the last month? Secondly, which of the following best describes your view of the quality of cars sold by ABC? The responses to these questions are shown in the Table below. Is there evidence of an association between customers’ purchasing behaviour and their perception of the quality of cars sold by ABC Ltd? Explain your results in terms that would be comprehensible to a manager with little knowledge of statistics.arrow_forwardA study in Sweden looked at former elite soccer players, people who had played soccer but not at the elite level, and people of the same age who did not play soccer. Here is a two-way table that classifies these subjects by whether or not they had arthritis of the hip or knee by their mid-fifties: Elite Non-elite Did not play Arthritis 10 9 24 No arthritis 61 206 548 Based on this study, you can conclude thatarrow_forward3] We all recognize the difference between naughty and nice, right? What about children less than a year old - do they recognize the difference and show a preference for nice over naughty? In a study reported in the November 2007 issue of Nature, researchers investigated whether infants take into account an individual’s actions towards others in evaluating that individual as appealing or aversive, perhaps laying the foundation for social interaction (Hamlin, Wynn, and Bloom, 2007). In one component of the study, infants were shown a “climber” character (a piece of wood with “google” eyes glued onto it) that could not make it up a hill in two tries. Then they were alternately shown two scenarios for the climber’s next try, one where the climber was pushed to the top of the hill by another character (“helper”) and one where the climber was pushed back down the hill by another character (“hinderer”). The infant was alternately shown these two scenarios several times. Then the child was…arrow_forward
- Aronson and Mills (1959) conducted an experiment to see whether people's liking for a group is influenced by the severity of initiation. They reasoned that when people willingly undergo a severe initiation to become members of a group, they are motivated to think that the group membership must be worthwhile. Otherwise, they would experience cognitive dissonance: Why put up with severe initiation for the sake of a group membership that is worthless? In their experiment, participants were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups: Group 1 (control) had no initiation. Group 2 (mild) had a mildly embarrassing initiation (reading words related to sex out loud). Group 3 (severe) had a severely embarrassing initiation (reading sexually explicit words and obscene words out loud). After the initiation, each person listened to a standard tape-recorded discussion among the group that they would now supposedly be invited to join; this was made up made to be as dull and banal as possible.…arrow_forwardA survey of 2645 consumers by DDB Needham Worldwide of Chicago for public relations agency Porter/Novelli showed that how a company handles a crisis when at fault is one of the top influences in consumer buying decisions, with 73% claiming it is an influence. Quality of product was the number one influence, with 96% of consumers stating that quality influences their buying decisions. How a company handles complaints was number two, with 85% of consumers reporting it as an influence in their buying decisions. Suppose a random sample of 1,100 consumers is taken and each is asked which of these three factors influence their buying decisions. Appendix A Statistical Tables https://education.wiley.com/was/ui/v2/assessment-player/index.html?launchId=2333882f-0c41-4ee5-8a4b-7f87d5b49481# a. What is the probability that more than 810 consumers claim that how a company handles a crisis when at fault is an influence in their buying decisions?b. What is the probability that fewer than 1,030…arrow_forwardA survey of 2645 consumers by DDB Needham Worldwide of Chicago for public relations agency Porter/Novelli showed that how a company handles a crisis when at fault is one of the top influences in consumer buying decisions,with 73% claiming it is an influence. Quality of product was the number one influence, with 96% of consumers stating that quality influences their buying decisions. How a company handles complaints was number two, with 85% of consumers reporting it as an influence in their buying decisions. Suppose a random sample of 1,200 consumers is taken and each is asked which of these three factors influence their buying decisions. Appendix A Statistical Tables a. What is the probability that more than 920 consumers claim that how a company handles a crisis when at fault is an influence in their buying decisions?b. What is the probability that fewer than 1,125 consumers claim that quality of product is an influence in their buying decisions?c. What is the probability that between…arrow_forward
- Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition...AlgebraISBN:9780547587776Author:HOLT MCDOUGALPublisher:HOLT MCDOUGAL