Concept explainers
a)
According to figure Edgeworth box is to be drawn with the help of total quantities of capital and labor.
b)
supposing the lower left corner of the box to be the origin for the isoquant map for good x then a few of the X isoquants is to be drawn.
c)
considering the upper right corner of the box to be the origin for the origin for the isoquant map for good Y then few Y isoquants in the Edgeworth box is to be drawn.
d)
Efficient points in the box is to mentioned and efficient conditions for given allocation of K and L is to be described.
e)
The
f)
By using the connection between box diagram and the production possibility frontier some cases are to be discussed.
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 10 Solutions
EBK INTERMEDIATE MICROECONOMICS AND ITS
- Suppose country A has 5000 units of capital and 2000 units of labor while country B has 6000 units of capital and 3000 units of labor: A: Which country is capital abundant and which one is labor abundant? Explain! Now suppose the production one unit of good X requires 3 units of capital and 2 units of labor and the production of one unit of good Y requires 6 units of capital and 3 units of labor. B: Which good is the capital intensive good and which one is the labor intensive good? Explain!! C: Which country should specialize in and export good X and which country should specialize in and export good Y. Explain!!! D: Using appropriate graphs, demonstrate that trade is beneficial if two countries have identical technology but different preferences. Does a country specialize in producing the good where they have the strongest preference? Explainarrow_forwardWhy do we use general equilibrium analysis rather than partial equilibrium analysis to study comparative advantage? Explainarrow_forwardWhat is the axiom of consumer choice that implies that consumers spend all their income in order to maximize utility? and Explain the main assumption behind a concave production possibilities frontierarrow_forward
- Suppose there are two individuals, Casey and Rick, who live in a very simplified world where only two goods are produced and consumed; rice and beans. The production opportunity cost for Casey is 4.00kg of rice for every kilogram of beans. Rick has a production opportunity cost of 2.00 kg of rice for every kilogram of beans. Casey eventually realizes that, through trade, both individuals can be better off. Rick is willing to trade. What price can be settled between these two parties such that both individuals can enjoy more rice and beans?arrow_forwardUse the Fundamental Theorem of Exchange and draw Edgeworth Box diagrams to show the conditions necessary for an 'efficient' allocation of two goods between two individuals. Use this model to evaluate the statement: "If two individuals have identical endowments of both goods there are no possible gains from trade". Hint: you need to develop your explanation of the theory and the efficiencyconditions step-by-step. You need to draw several diagrams showing Edgeworth Boxarrow_forwardIf the production possibilities frontier can be expressed as 4X2+y2=16, then the point X=√3; Y+2 is a)inside the production possibilities frontier b)outside the production possibilities frontier c)in the wrong quadrant to be on the graph d)on the production possibilities frontierarrow_forward
- Consider the figure attached below which shows the combined production function of Anna and Bob. Assume a case where Anna works on the land owned by Bob. By referring to the diagram above, explain how does Anna ranks the possible allocations marked as X, Y, Z and A according to production functions and their curves and slopes ? Question is completearrow_forwardIn the above diagram above which of the following statement is TRUE? A) To move from production combination A to production combination B requires that we transfer resources from guns to butter. B) To move from production combination A to production combination B requires that we either increase the available resources or improve the available technology. C) To move from production combination A to production combination B requires that we expand gun production by reducing butter production. D) To move from production combination A to production combination B requires that we reduce the amount of resources that are either unemployed or underemployed. E) To move from production combination A to production combination B requires that we transfer resources from butter to guns.arrow_forwardQ2. Suppose that there are two countries (A and B) and two goods (a labor-intensive good X, textile, and a capital-intensive good Y, electronics). The two countries have identical demand for the two goods but different labor and capital endowments. Suppose (Px/Py)A < (Px/Py)B in autarky. Identify the capital-abundant country and the labor-abundant country, respectively. Use a PPF-indifference-curve graph to identify the autarky equilibrium for country B. In the same graph, show country B's gains from trade when the two countries trade at a level of Px/Py that is between the two countries' autarky price ratios. In the above graph, identify the trade triangle (including export and import quantities) for country B. What would be the effect of trade on country B's relative nominal wage rate, i.e., the ratio of nominal wage rate relative to nominal capital rental rate (w/r)? Illustrate your answer graphically. Your answer:arrow_forward
- State the first theorem of welfare economics of a production and exchange economy. Which conditions must be satisfied for the Pareto efficiency of an allocation of a production and exchange economy (assuming that all goods are used, produced and consumed in strictly positive quantities)? Discuss and explainarrow_forwardQ/ Country X and Country Y are neighbours. Both Country X and Country Y can produce two goods: food and clothing. In one week, Country X can produce 4,400 clothing units or 2,200 food units, or a mix of the two. In one week, Country Y can produce 5,000 clothing units or 2,000 food units, or a mix of the two.For both Country X and Country Y, their individual trade-offs between clothing units and food units are constant, regardless of how they allocate their time. Currently, Country X produces 2,400 clothing units and 1,000 food units per week while Country Y produces 2,500 clothing units and 1,000 food units per week. c. Which country has a comparative advantage in food production? Which country has acomparative advantage in clothing production? Illustrate your answer using the PPC and showall the calculations. d. Should Country X and Country Y specialize and trade with one another? Why?arrow_forwardNot a previously graded question. Suppose the fictional country of Katmai produces only two goods: millet and microprocessors. The following graph plots Katmai's current production possibilities frontier, and includes six different output combinations given by black points (plus symbols) labeled A to F. Complete the following table by indicating whether each point represents output combinations that are inefficient, efficient, or unattainable. Check all that apply.arrow_forward