![Lms Integrated Mindtap Business Law, 1 Term (6 Months) Printed Access Card For Mann/roberts’ Smith And Roberson’s Business Law, 17th](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781337094566/9781337094566_largeCoverImage.gif)
Given situation:
Person B contracted with person M for purchasing a house. Before several weeks they both negotiated about the sale of certain items of furniture in the house. Person M sent a letter on April 30 contains a list of furnishings that are to be furnished and includes an advance payment of $3,000. Later on June 3, the letter sent by person M to person B was misplaced and he sent another letter. Finally person M moved into dew house and he finds that there had been a misunderstanding relating to the listed purchase items.
To discuss: Whether person M will be able to collect the additional amount from person B.
![Check Mark](/static/check-mark.png)
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution![Blurred answer](/static/blurred-answer.jpg)
Chapter 10 Solutions
Lms Integrated Mindtap Business Law, 1 Term (6 Months) Printed Access Card For Mann/roberts’ Smith And Roberson’s Business Law, 17th
- Norma English made an offer to purchase a house owned by Michael and Laurie Montgomery (Montgomery) for $272,000. In her offer, English also proposed to purchase certain personal property—paving stones and a fireplace screen worth a total of $100—from Montgomery. When Montgomery received English’s offer, Montgomery made many changes to English’s offer, including deleting the paving stones and fireplace screen from the personal property that English wanted. When English received the Montgomery counteroffer, English accepted and initialed all of Montgomery’s changes except that English did not initial the change that deleted the paving stones and fireplace screen from the deal.Subsequently, Montgomery notified English that because English had not completely accepted the terms of Montgomery’s counteroffer, Montgomery was therefore withdrawing from the deal. That same day, Montgomery signed a contract to sell the house to another buyer for $285,000. English sued Montgomery for specific…arrow_forwardPalmer made a valid contract with Ames under which Ames was to sell Palmer’s goods on commission from January 1 to June 30. Ames made satisfactory sales up to May 15 and was then about to close an unusually large order when Palmer suddenly and without notice revoked Ames’s authority to sell. Can Ames continue to sell Palmer’s goods during the unexpired term of her contract?arrow_forwardWolcott and Sarah, both merchants and residents of Gainesville, Florida, aspire to enter into a contract with each other for the sale/purchase of goods. After Wolcott makes an offer to Sarah, Sarah responds with a written confirmation of acceptance; however, this written confirmation of acceptance states additional terms that are not present in Wolcott's offer. Nevertheless, Wolcott's offer did not expressly limit acceptance to the terms of his offer and Sarah's additional terms do not materially alter Wolcott's offer. If Wolcott does not give notification of objection to Sarah's terms within a reasonable time, which of the following will occur? O Due to the Mirror Image Rule, a contract is not founded until both Wolcott and Sarah agree to the same exact terms. ODue to Wolcott's failure to give notification of objection to Sarah's terms within a reasonable time, Sarah's terms will become part of the contract. O Sarah's additional terms constitute a rejection of Wolcott's offer and…arrow_forward
- made the following statements to danny: 'If you open your shop here, I'd say the business pulls in at least RM2,000 a week. No one so far is selling homemade products in this area. You can display your product outside as well." Danny decided to rent the business premises and operate the new branch of his shop. After running the shop for 3 months, the most the restaurant earned in a week was RM1,000. He also discovered that some other shops were selling the similar product at cheaper price in the area. He was very upset because he had suffered a loss. Danny was so worried about his loss in his business, and he wanted to hire Peter to provide him with a consultancy on how to increase the sale in his restaurant business. When Danny asked Peter about the fees, Peter said: " My fee is $10,000 but I know you cannot afford that in this current state. I will think about it and get back to you later. Perhaps we should wait and see what happens.” Danny wanted to give Peter something now. Peter…arrow_forwardA buver made an offer on a property on September 25th. The Seller countered on September 26th. Both parties signed the purchase contract on September 28th. The property closed on December 31st. What is the effective date of contract? O December 31st O September 26th O September 28th O September 25tharrow_forwardOn March 1, Lucas called Craig on the telephone and offered to pay him $190,000 for a house and lot that Craig owned. Craig accepted the offer immediately on the telephone. Later in the same day, Lucas told Annabelle that if she would marry him, he would convey to her the property he then owned, which was the subject of the earlier agreement. On March 2, Lucas called Penelope and offered her $25,000 if she would work for him for the year commencing March 15, and she agreed. Lucas and Annabelle were married on June 25. By this time, Craig had refused to convey the house to Lucas. Thereafter, Lucas renounced his promise to convey the property to Annabelle. Penelope, who had been working for Lucas, was discharged without cause on July 5; Annabelle left Lucas and instituted divorce proceedings. What rights, if any, have— a. Lucas against Craig for his failure to convey the property? b. Annabelle against Lucas for failure to convey the house to her? c. Penelope against Lucas for discharging…arrow_forward
- Anderson, a farmer, orally agreed to buy a used tractor from the Copeland Equipment Company for $475. Copeland delivered the tractor to Anderson, who used it for 11 days. During this period, Anderson could not borrow enough funds to cover the purchase price. Anderson therefore returned the tractor to Copeland. Both parties agreed that their sales contract was canceled when the tractor was returned. However, Copeland later claimed that under the doctrine of quasi- contract, Anderson was required to pay for the 11-day use of the tractor. Do you agree with Copeland? Explain your answer. [See Anderson v. Copeland, 378 P.2d 1006 (OK).]arrow_forwardFacts: On February 1, 2004, Buyer entered into a contract to buy Seller’s house in Las Vegas for $532,500 with a March closing date. On February 3, 2004 Seller notified Buyer that he was terminating the contract (without any legal basis for taking such action). The Seller then told Buyer that he would sell him the house for a higher price. On February 3, 2004, Buyer and Seller entered into a new contract for a price of $578,000. On February 16, 2004, the Seller refused to perform under the contract. The Buyer sued seeking to enforce the contract. Question: Under the common law of contracts, is the modification to the original contract enforceable? Deliverable: Write a clear, grammatically correct answer being sure to address the following points in your answer: Provide a clear statement of the governing legal principle (also called a ‘black letter law’). The ‘governing legal principle’ in any case is the legal principle that is the key to completing the legal analysis of the problem…arrow_forwardThe Thoelkes were owners of real property located in Orange County, which the Morrisons agreed to purchase. The Morrisons signed a contract for the sale of that property and mailed it to the Thoelkes in Texas on November 26. The next day the Thoelkes executed the contract and placed it in the mail addressed to the Morrisons’ attorney in Florida. After the executed contract was mailed but before it was received in Florida, the Thoelkes called the Morrisons’ attorney in Florida and attempted to repudiate the contract. Does a contract exist between the Thoelkes and the Morrisons? Discuss.arrow_forward
- On March 5, 2020, A wrote a letter to B offering to him the lease of a building. On March 6, 2020, at 1:00 P.M. sent a letter of acceptance which h was received by A at 4:00 P.M. that day. But at 2:00 P.M., A had already sent B a letter of withdrawal of the offer which was received by B at 5:00 P.M. Was the contract perfected ? Reasons?arrow_forwardDiscuss and explain whether there is valid consideration for each of the following promises:a. A and B entered into a contract for the purchase and sale of goods. A subsequently promised to pay a higher price for the goods when B refused to deliver at the contract price. b. A promised in writing to pay a debt, which was due from B to C, on C’s agreement to extend the time of payment for one year. c. A orally promised to pay $150 to her son, B, solely in consideration of past services rendered to A by B, for which there had been no agreement or request to pay.arrow_forwardBarnes accepted Clark’s offer to sell to him a portion of Clark’s coin collection. Clark forgot that his prized $20 gold piece at the time of the offer and acceptance was included in the portion that he offered to sell to Barnes. Clark did not intend to include the gold piece in the sale. Barnes, at the time of inspecting the offered portion of the collection and prior to accepting the offer, saw the gold piece. Is Barnes entitled to the $20 gold piece? Explainarrow_forward
- Understanding BusinessManagementISBN:9781259929434Author:William NickelsPublisher:McGraw-Hill EducationManagement (14th Edition)ManagementISBN:9780134527604Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. CoulterPublisher:PEARSONSpreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis: A Pract...ManagementISBN:9781305947412Author:Cliff RagsdalePublisher:Cengage Learning
- Management Information Systems: Managing The Digi...ManagementISBN:9780135191798Author:Kenneth C. Laudon, Jane P. LaudonPublisher:PEARSONBusiness Essentials (12th Edition) (What's New in...ManagementISBN:9780134728391Author:Ronald J. Ebert, Ricky W. GriffinPublisher:PEARSONFundamentals of Management (10th Edition)ManagementISBN:9780134237473Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter, David A. De CenzoPublisher:PEARSON
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781259929434/9781259929434_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780134527604/9780134527604_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305947412/9781305947412_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Text book image](https://compass-isbn-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/isbn_cover_images/9780135191798/9780135191798_smallCoverImage.jpg)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780134728391/9780134728391_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780134237473/9780134237473_smallCoverImage.gif)