Smith and Roberson’s Business Law
17th Edition
ISBN: 9781337094757
Author: Richard A. Mann, Barry S. Roberts
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 10, Problem 17CP
Summary Introduction
Given situation:
Company L advertised its used Volvo station wagon for sale in one of the popular newspapers. The newspaper agency mispriced the cost of car in their newspaper and published the same. Later on person O read the newspaper advertisement and he wants to purchase the car for the price published in the newspaper.
To discuss: Whether there is any contract in this situation if so, then determine the contract price.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
On March 17, Peckham bought a new car from Larsen Chevrolet for $16,400. During the first one and one-half months after the purchase, Peckham discovered that the car’s hood was dented, its gas tank contained no baffles, its emergency brake was inoperable, the car did not have a jack or a spare tire, and neither the clock nor the speedometer worked. Larsen claimed that Peckham knew of the defects at the time of the purchase. Peckham, on the other hand, claimed that he did not know the extent of the defects and that despite his repeated efforts the defects were not repaired until June 11. Then, on July 15, the car’s dashboard caught fire, leaving the car’s interior damaged and the car itself inoperable. Peckham then returned to Larsen Chevrolet and told Larsen that he had to repair the car at his own expense or that he, Peckham, would either rescind the contract or demand a new automobile. Peckham also claimed that at the end of their conversation he notified Larsen Chevrolet that he was…
Bob went out with his friends to celebrate his birthday. They went to a bar where they drank copious quantities of alcohol. In the morning, Bob had not slept and was still obviously intoxicated. He found his way to a car dealership near his house and entered into a contract to buy a Mercedes Benz SUV for the cost of $140,000.00. The car salesman could smell alcohol on Bob's breath, he noticed his eyes were bloodshot and "glossy" while they were signing the papers relating to the sale, and when Bob left he could see that he was unsteady on his feet. Bob left the dealership and went home and went to bed. He slept for two days. The car salesman from the dealership called Bob 4 days later to tell him that his vehicle was ready for pick up. Bob had no memory of the buying any car.
In these circumstances:A. the contract is void ab initio because Bob lacked capacity to contract due to his intoxicationB. Bob can avoid or repudiate the contract within a reasonable time after he regains capacity…
Shah, in response to an inquiry by Onyango regarding the possible sale of his (Shah’s) car, wrote to Onyango stating, “I have decided to sell to you my car for ksh 2,000,000. If I hear nothing from you before next Sunday, I will take it that you have accepted. “Onyango considered the price to be too high and decided to look for another car but forgot to reply to Shah’s letter. Shah is now threatening to sue Onyango for breach of contract. Advise Onyango.
Chapter 10 Solutions
Smith and Roberson’s Business Law
Ch. 10 - Prob. 1COCh. 10 - Prob. 2COCh. 10 - Prob. 3COCh. 10 - Prob. 4COCh. 10 - Prob. 5COCh. 10 - Prob. 1QCh. 10 - Prob. 2QCh. 10 - Prob. 3QCh. 10 - Prob. 4QCh. 10 - Prob. 5Q
Ch. 10 - Prob. 6QCh. 10 - Prob. 7QCh. 10 - Prob. 8QCh. 10 - Prob. 9QCh. 10 - Prob. 10QCh. 10 - Prob. 11QCh. 10 - Prob. 12QCh. 10 - Prob. 13QCh. 10 - Prob. 14CPCh. 10 - Prob. 15CPCh. 10 - Prob. 16CPCh. 10 - Prob. 17CPCh. 10 - Prob. 18CPCh. 10 - Prob. 19CPCh. 10 - Prob. 20CPCh. 10 - Prob. 21CPCh. 10 - Prob. 22CPCh. 10 - Prob. 23CPCh. 10 - Prob. 1TSCh. 10 - Prob. 2TSCh. 10 - Prob. 3TS
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Danny sells his second-hand car to BB Auto Traders, a used car dealer. During the verbal negotiations the vehicle is described as a 2017 Civit Honda. After the sale, BB Auto Traders discovered that the car was in fact a 2015 Civit Honda. The registration document stated it was first registered in 2017 and when Danny sold the car, he relied on the information detailed both within the car log book and on the registration document, but it turned out that the logbook was forged by the previous owner and the registration document was inaccurate. Advise Danny on the legal issues that arise in contract law. In doing so, you should interpret the terms of contract, identifying if any terms have been breached and what remedies might arise Would your answer be different if the negotiations between Danny and BB Auto Traders were all undertaken via email? why explain properly.arrow_forwardDorton, as a representative for The Carpet Mart, purchased carpets from Collins & Aikman that were supposedly manufactured of 100 percent Kodel polyester fiber but were, in fact, made of cheaper and inferior fibers. Dorton then brought suit for compensatory and punitive damages against Collins & Aikman for its fraud, deceit, and misrepresentation in the sale of the carpets. Collins & Aikman moved for a stay pending arbitration, claiming that Dorton was bound to an arbitration agreement printed on the reverse side of Collins & Aikman’s printed sales acknowledgment form. A provision printed on the face of the acknowledgment form stated that its acceptance was “subject to all of the terms and conditions on the face and reverse side thereof, including arbitration, all of which are accepted by buyer.” Is the arbitration clause enforceable? Why or why not?arrow_forwardSmith, having contracted to sell to Beyer thirty tons of described fertilizer, shipped to Beyer by carrier thirty tons of fertilizer, which he stated conformed to the contract. Nothing was stated in the contract as to time of payment, but Smith demanded payment as a condition of handing over the fertilizer to Beyer. Beyer refused to pay unless he was given the opportunity to inspect the fertilizer. Who is correct? Explain.arrow_forward
- Carol White ordered a $225 pair of contact lenses through an optometrist. White, an emancipated minor, paid $100 by check and agreed to pay the remaining $125 at a later time. The doctor ordered the lenses, incurring a debt of $110. After the lenses were ordered, White called to cancel her order and stopped payment on the $100 check. The lenses could be used by no one but White. The doctor sued White for the value of the lenses. Will the doctor be able to recover the money from White? Explain.arrow_forwardAfter receiving a promotion to logistics manager, Shantil’s husband, Ashton, purchased a 2017 BMW SUV for $68,000; however, he financed $48,000 through First Florida Banc. The bank took a security interest in the vehicle. Ashton was out of town for work when Shantil found out he had been having an affair. Shantil took a baseball bat and broke the windows and put dents in the BMW. Shantil then dropped the car off at the girlfriend’s apartment. Ashton was furious. After taking the car to a body shop for repairs, Ashton was unable to pay the bill due to the divorce, so he negotiated terms with the body shop; however, the shop retained possession of the vehicle. The repair shop claimed a lien on the car for services and materials in the amount of $21,250. Ashton stopped making payments to the bank while he was trying to save money to pay off the repair. First Florida Banc claimed priority. Discuss the rights of each party and determine which party is in the best position to prevailarrow_forwardKate owned a small grocery store. One day John went to the store and purchased a can of chip dip that was, unknown to Kate or John, adulterated. John became seriously ill after eating the dip and sued Kate for damages on the grounds that she breached an implied warranty of merchantability. Is Kate liable? Why?arrow_forward
- The Case: Ben purchased a used Laptop from Smart store during the sales period. He asked the salesperson, Rodny, if the Laptop had ever been damaged. Rodny (the salesperson) had never seen the Laptop before that morning and knew nothing of its history but quickly answered Ben’s question by stating: ‘No. It has never been damaged’. In fact, the Laptop had been seriously damaged previously and, although repaired and bought during the sales, it was worth much less than the value Ben had paid. When Ben learned the truth, he wanted to return the Laptop. Smart store replied that he cannot do that because they have a legally binding agreement and as per the agreement the items purchased during the sales cannot be returned. Questions: A) Does the behavior of the salesperson, Rodny, constitute deception? If it constitutes deception please precise which type of deception and explain in detail all the elements of the type of deception selected. B) Decide, based on the analysis made under…arrow_forwardSalem Supply Co. sells new and used gardening equipment. Ben Buyer purchased a slightly used riding lawn mower for $1,500. The price was considerably less than that of comparable used mowers. The sale was clearly indicated to be “as is.” Two weeks after Ben purchased the mower, the police arrived at his house with Owen Owner, the true owner of the lawn mower, which had been stolen from his yard, and reclaimed the mower. What recourse, if any, does Ben have?arrow_forwardThe ABC Company, located in Chicago, contracted to sell a carload of television sets to Dodd in St. Louis, Missouri, on sixty days’ credit. ABC Company shipped the carload to Dodd. Upon arrival of the car at St. Louis, Dodd paid the freight charges and reshipped the car to Hines of Little Rock, Arkansas, to whom he had previously contracted to sell the television sets. While the car was in transit to Little Rock, Dodd went bankrupt. ABC Company was informed of this at once and immediately telephoned XYZ Railroad Company to withhold delivery of the television sets. What should the XYZ Railroad Company do?arrow_forward
- Mary, a keen pottery collector, saw a notice for an auction at James Pottery Limited on September 30th 2017 in the Daily News. She traveled 300 kilometers to attend the auction in order to bid for a particularly rare item of Mozart pottery, specifically mentioned in the list of items to be auctioned. However, when she got to the auction site she found a notice outside, stating that the auction had been canceled. Mary went into a nearby antique shop and saw an item of the same type of pottery she had come to bid for, which the price ticket stated $5000. Mary indicated to the shop owner, Anthony, that she was only willing to pay $4,000 for it. However, Anthony said he would sell it for $4,500. Mary then indicated to him that she would like time to think about it over lunch; Anthony thereafter, agreed not to sell it before Mary returned. However, when Mary returned to buy the pottery, she found that Anthony had already sold it to someone else, who had paid $4500 for it. In the context…arrow_forwardHelvey brought suit against the Wabash County REMC (REMC) for breach of implied and express warranties. He alleged that REMC furnished electricity in excess of 135 volts to Helvey’s home, damaging his 110-volt household appliances. This incident occurred more than four years before Helvey brought this suit. In defense, REMC pleads that the Uniform Commercial Code’s (UCC’s) Article 2 statute of limitations of four years has passed, thereby barring Helvey’s suit. Helvey argues that providing electrical energy is not a transaction in goods under the UCC but rather a furnishing of services that would make applicable the general contract six-year statute of limitations. Is the contract governed by the UCC? Why or why not?arrow_forward1) Donald met Daisy at the Mall. Donald saw that Daisy had a brand new Apple tablet in her hand, he immediately told Daisy that he is interested in purchasing her tablet for $5000.00: Daisy responded in the following manner; Daisy did not answer Donald and simply walked away. Based on Donald’s original offer to purchase the tablet for $5,000, Daisy inquired from him, the method of payment for the tablet. Daisy told Donald that she paid $10,000.00 for the Tablet and if he agrees to pay her that amount, she is willing to accept. Donald responded that he is only willing to pay $6,000. Advised Daisy on whether or not a valid agreement exists between Donald and her, pertaining to the three issues above.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Understanding BusinessManagementISBN:9781259929434Author:William NickelsPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Management (14th Edition)ManagementISBN:9780134527604Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. CoulterPublisher:PEARSON
Spreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis: A Pract...ManagementISBN:9781305947412Author:Cliff RagsdalePublisher:Cengage Learning
Management Information Systems: Managing The Digi...ManagementISBN:9780135191798Author:Kenneth C. Laudon, Jane P. LaudonPublisher:PEARSON
Business Essentials (12th Edition) (What's New in...ManagementISBN:9780134728391Author:Ronald J. Ebert, Ricky W. GriffinPublisher:PEARSON
Fundamentals of Management (10th Edition)ManagementISBN:9780134237473Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter, David A. De CenzoPublisher:PEARSON
Understanding Business
Management
ISBN:9781259929434
Author:William Nickels
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Management (14th Edition)
Management
ISBN:9780134527604
Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter
Publisher:PEARSON
Spreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis: A Pract...
Management
ISBN:9781305947412
Author:Cliff Ragsdale
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Management Information Systems: Managing The Digi...
Management
ISBN:9780135191798
Author:Kenneth C. Laudon, Jane P. Laudon
Publisher:PEARSON
Business Essentials (12th Edition) (What's New in...
Management
ISBN:9780134728391
Author:Ronald J. Ebert, Ricky W. Griffin
Publisher:PEARSON
Fundamentals of Management (10th Edition)
Management
ISBN:9780134237473
Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter, David A. De Cenzo
Publisher:PEARSON