![The Legal Environment of Business: Text and Cases](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305764460/9781305764460_largeCoverImage.gif)
Case summary:The person S was a finance director at company T. He has frequently complained to the General Manager C of one of the managers IM for his behavior and attitude. The General Manager could not fire the person IM as he brought a lot of business to the company. One day, while IM was dropping a cash envelope into a safe, it got stuck. The person S stole it. General Manager asked the responsible party to return the envelope within twenty hours to avoid criminal charges. The person S returned the envelope after the due hours. He was charged with embezzlement.
To Find:The reasons for conviction on grounds of embezzlement instead of larceny.
Case summary:The person S was a finance director at company T. He has frequently complained to the General Manager C of one of the managers IM for his behavior and attitude. The General Manager could not fire the person IM as he brought a lot of business to the company. One day, while IM was dropping a cash envelope into a safe, it got stuck. The person S stole it. General Manager asked the responsible party to return the envelope within twenty hours to avoid criminal charges. The person S returned the envelope after the due hours. He was charged with embezzlement.
To Find:The difference between embezzlement and larceny.
![Check Mark](/static/check-mark.png)
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
![Blurred answer](/static/blurred-answer.jpg)
Chapter 10 Solutions
The Legal Environment of Business: Text and Cases
- What are the pertinent facts on the “The Lorax Harvard Case Stud”arrow_forward19-2. Duty of Loyalty. Peter hires Alice as an agent to sell a piece of property he owns. The price is to be at least $30,000. Alice discovers that the fair market value of Peter's property is actually at least $45,000 and could be higher because a shopping mall is going to be built nearby. Alice forms a real estate partnership with her cousin Carl. Then she prepares for Peter's signature a contract for the sale of the property to Carl for $32,000. Peter signs the contract. Just before closing and passage of tittle, Peter learns about the shopping mall and the increased fair market value of his property. Peter refuses to deed the property to Carl. Carl claims that Alice, as Peter's Agent, solicited a price above that agreed on when the agency was created and that the contract is therefore enforceable. Discuss fully whether Peter is bound to this contract. (See Duties, Right, and Remedies of Agents and Principals.)arrow_forwardLaud Humphrey 1970. Tearoom Trade: Impersonal Sex in Public Places. (Chicago: Aldine). In his book, Tearoom Trade (1970), Humphrey studied homosexual behavior by observing casual same-sex acts by male strangers who met at public restrooms in a park, referred to as “tearooms” by participants. He pretended to be a homosexual and acted as the lookout, known as the “watch queen,” whenever possible—a perfect opportunity to observed. To find out more about the participants, he secretly took down their license plate numbers when possible and used the police register to obtain their names and addresses. In disguise, he went to these men’s homes under the pretense that he was conducting a health survey, to gather more information about them. You are required to: Discuss the ethical issues involved in this study? Could the research have been done any other way that you deem to be ethical?arrow_forward
- 1. What is an Ultra Vires act? How is it different from an illegal act? Explainarrow_forwarddiscuss how the death penaly can be ethically justified and discuss circumstances if any that you think it is legally justified.arrow_forwardWhat is a reasonable victim standard? How does the court use it?arrow_forward
- Second-degree murder Involuntary manslaughter Burglary Larceny Forgery Extortion Embezzlement Cyber crime Money Laundering Fraud [Choose ] The taking of another's personal property other than from his or her person or building. The unintentional, unlawful killing of a human being by another person that is caused by a negligent or reckless act. The taking of personal property from another's home, office or commercial or other type of building. Knowingly engaging in a financial transaction involving the proceeds of an illegal activity. The fraudulent conversion of property by a person to whom that property was entrusted. The intentional, unlawful killing of a human being by another person that is not premeditated. The fraudulent making or alteration of a written document that affects the legal liability of another person. A threat to expose something about another person unless that other person gives money or property. Obtaining the title to property through deception or trickery A…arrow_forwardAnswer the question below thank you. 1. Mike Tyson walks up to Ethan and says, “I will punch you in the face.” Do you see any torts? If so whichones? What are the facts?2. Mike was angry with Joe his friend because he hit on his sister Mary. Mike is 6’4” and Joe is 6’. Mikesees Joe and grabs a baseball bat, walks up to Joe, and says, “I’ll break you!” Joe looks at Mike andbelieves he will really take a swing. Is Mike responsible for any torts? If so which one? What are thefacts?3. Sally’s boyfriend lives three blocks down the street. He has hit her before. He calls Sally because he ismad she is going out with her girlfriends on a Friday night. He says, “I am going to come over there andbeat you.” Sally is upset and frightened he will follow through. Is Sally’s boyfriend responsible for anytorts? If so which one? What are the facts?4. Michelle was walking through Target. She was looking at DVDs and without realizing it she placed theDVD in her purse. Paul watched her do it and stopped…arrow_forwardFind another example of corporate espionage and writea brief report on it. Did the guilty party pay restitutionor serve prison time? Discuss what punishments, ifany, should be levied in cases of corporate espionage.arrow_forward
- Hurry, please: 28. As per "Inside Ralph Nader's American Museum of Tort Law" what 1966 federal law did Ralph Nader influence?arrow_forwardWho may be called upon to do jury duty? What exemptions are there to this?arrow_forwardCompare and contrast the Durham and substantial capacity insanity tests with the M’Naghten test. Which test makes it more difficult for a defendant to prove in court? How different is the type and amount of evidence that needs to be submitted for each of the three tests? Which test do you think better serves the goal of only punishing people who can be considered worthy of blame for their behavior? Which test is better suited to serve the goal of deterring others from committing crimes?arrow_forward
- BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student EditionBusinessISBN:9781337407137Author:KellyPublisher:Cengage LearningEssentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...BusinessISBN:9781337386494Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana LoewyPublisher:Cengage LearningAccounting Information Systems (14th Edition)BusinessISBN:9780134474021Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. SteinbartPublisher:PEARSON
- International Business: Competing in the Global M...BusinessISBN:9781259929441Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. HultPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781337407137/9781337407137_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781337386494/9781337386494_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780134474021/9780134474021_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781947172548/9781947172548_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781259929441/9781259929441_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780357026595/9780357026595_smallCoverImage.gif)