EBK AUDITING+ASSURANCE SERVICES
17th Edition
ISBN: 9780135171219
Author: ARENS
Publisher: PEARSON CO
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 11, Problem 11RQ
To determine
Identify the major factors that allowed embezzlement to take place in Company BS.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Fleming and Company CPAs, issued an unqualified opinion the 20x3 financial statements of Walton Corporation Late in 20X4, Walton determined that its
controller had embezzled over $2,000,000. Fleming was unaware of the embezzlement. Walton has decided to sue Fleming to recover the $2,000,000. The
suit is based upon Fleming's failure to discover the missing money while performing the audit. Which of the following is Fleming's best defense?
Multiple Choice
The controller was Walton's agent and as such had designed the controls which facilitated the embezzlement
Fleming had no knowledge of the embezzlement.
That the audit was performed in accordance with GAAS
The financial statements were presented in conformity with GAAP.
As the auditor for Company A, you discover that a material sale ($500,000 sale; cost of goods of $300,000) was made to a customer this year. Because of poor internal accounting controls, the sale was never recorded. Your client makes a management decision not to bill the customer because such a long time has passed since the shipment was made. You determine, to the best of your ability, that the sale was not fraudulent. Using the framework for ethical decision making, determine whether the auditor should require either a recording or a disclosure of the sales transaction.
Instructions:
Using the framework for ethical decision making, determine whether the auditor should require either a recording or a disclosure of the sales transaction. Please make sure to use at least 100 words in your response. Once you give your response, please respond to at least two of your peers using at least 50 words in your responses. Remember to follow the netiquette guidelines found in the course…
Mark Williams, CPA, was engaged by Jackson Financial Development Company to audit the financial statements of Apex Construction Company, a small closely held corporation. Williams was told when he was engaged that Jackson Financial needed reliable financial statements that would be used to determine whether to purchase a substantial amount of Apex Construction’s convertible debentures at the price asked by the estate of one of Apex’s former directors.
Williams performed his audit in a negligent manner. As a result of his negligence, he failed to discover substantial defalcations by Carl Brown, the Apex controller. Jackson Financial purchased the debentures, but it would not have done so if the defalcations had been discovered. After discovery of the fraud, Jackson Financial promptly sold them for the highest price offered in the market at a $70,000 loss.
If Apex Construction also sues Williams for negligence, what are the probable legal defenses Williams’s attorney would raise?…
Chapter 11 Solutions
EBK AUDITING+ASSURANCE SERVICES
Ch. 11 - Prob. 1RQCh. 11 - Prob. 2RQCh. 11 - Prob. 3RQCh. 11 - Prob. 4RQCh. 11 - Prob. 5RQCh. 11 - Prob. 6RQCh. 11 - Prob. 7RQCh. 11 - Prob. 8RQCh. 11 - Prob. 9RQCh. 11 - Prob. 10RQ
Ch. 11 - Prob. 11RQCh. 11 - Prob. 12RQCh. 11 - Prob. 13RQCh. 11 - Prob. 14RQCh. 11 - Prob. 15RQCh. 11 - Prob. 16RQCh. 11 - Prob. 17RQCh. 11 - Prob. 18RQCh. 11 - Prob. 19RQCh. 11 - Prob. 20.1MCQCh. 11 - Actions, policies, and procedures that reflect the...Ch. 11 - Prob. 20.3MCQCh. 11 - Prob. 21.1MCQCh. 11 - Prob. 21.2MCQCh. 11 - Prob. 21.3MCQCh. 11 - Prob. 22.1MCQCh. 11 - Prob. 22.2MCQCh. 11 - Which of the following correctly describes an...Ch. 11 - Prob. 23DQPCh. 11 - Prob. 24DQPCh. 11 - The following are misstatements that have occurred...Ch. 11 - Prob. 26DQPCh. 11 - Prob. 27DQPCh. 11 - Prob. 28DQPCh. 11 - Prob. 29DQPCh. 11 - Prob. 30DQPCh. 11 - Prob. 31DQPCh. 11 - Prob. 32C
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Mark Williams, CPA, was engaged by Jackson Financial Development Company to audit the financial statements of Apex Construction Company, a small closely held corporation. Williams was told when he was engaged that Jackson Financial needed reliable financial statements that would be used to determine whether to purchase a substantial amount of Apex Construction’s convertible debentures at the price asked by the estate of one of Apex’s former directors. Williams performed his audit in a negligent manner. As a result of his negligence, he failed to discover substantial defalcations by Carl Brown, the Apex controller. Jackson Financial purchased the debentures, but it would not have done so if the defalcations had been discovered. After discovery of the fraud, Jackson Financial promptly sold them for the highest price offered in the market at a $70,000 loss. What liability does Williams have to Jackson Financial? Explainarrow_forwardMark Williams, CPA, was engaged by Jackson Financial Development Company to audit the financial statements of Apex Construction Company, a small closely held corporation. Williams was told when he was engaged that Jackson Financial needed reliable financial statements that would be used to determine whether to purchase a substantial amount of Apex Construction’s convertible debentures at the price asked by the estate of one of Apex’s former directors. Williams performed his audit in a negligent manner. As a result of his negligence, he failed to discover substantial defalcations by Carl Brown, the Apex controller. Jackson Financial purchased the debentures, but it would not have done so if the defalcations had been discovered. After discovery of the fraud, Jackson Financial promptly sold them for the highest price offered in the market at a $70,000 loss. Will the negligence of Mark Williams, CPA, prevent him from recovering on a liability insurance policy covering the practice of…arrow_forwardSam Jones has been the controller of Downtown Tires for 25 years. Ownership of the firm recently changed hands and the new owners are conducting an audit of the financial records. The audit has been unable to reproduce financial reports that were prepared by Sam. While there is no evidence of wrongdoing, the auditors are concerned that the discrepancies might contribute to poor decisions. Which of the following characteristics of useful information is absent in the situation described above? timelyaccessibleverifiablecompleterelevantarrow_forward
- Rohini works as an accountant with PQR Ltd. She embezzled $20,000 from the company bank account. She was caught in the annual audit of the company. She justified her action saying that her employer has not given any pay rise, so she had to take $20,000 from the account. Explain in your own words the internal control that may have failed in the above situation. Also explain which element of the fraud triangle Rohini is referring to justify her action.arrow_forwardAn audit manager has led the audit of Topaz Ltd for the last three years. Evidence of a fraud involving the falsification of timesheets and supplier invoices to a significant value have been found. Senior management within Topaz are implicated. Discuss the extent to which the external auditor should be criticised for not discovering this fraud.arrow_forwardGordon & Moore, CPAS, were the auditors of Fox & Company, a brokerage firm. Gordon & Moore examined and reported on the financial statements of Fox, which were filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Several of Fox's customers were swindled by a fraudulent scheme perpetrated by two key officers of the company. The facts establish that Gordon & Moore were negligent, but not reckless or grossly negligent, in the conduct of the audit, and neither participated in the fraudulent scheme nor knew of Its existence. The customers are suing Gordon & Moore under the antifraud provisions of Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for alding and abetting the fraudulent scheme of the officers. The customers' sult for fraud is predicated exclusively on the negligence of the auditors in falling to conduct a proper audit, thereby failing to discover the fraudulent scheme. Required: Answer the following, setting forth reasons for any conclusions stated. a. What is…arrow_forward
- Gordon & Moore, CPAs, were the auditors of Fox & Company, a brokerage firm. Gordon & Moore examined and reported on the financial statements of Fox, which were filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Several of Fox’s customers were swindled by a fraudulent scheme perpetrated by two key officers of the company. The facts establish that Gordon & Moore were negligent, but not reckless or grossly negligent, in the conduct of the audit, and neither participated in the fraudulent scheme nor knew of its existence. The customers are suing Gordon & Moore under the antifraud provisions of Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for aiding and abetting the fraudulent scheme of the officers. The customers’ suit for fraud is predicated exclusively on the negligence of the auditors in failing to conduct a proper audit, thereby failing to discover the fraudulent scheme. What is the probable outcome of the lawsuit? Explain. What other…arrow_forwardWhich of the following risk factors can result in auditors collecting more audit evidence? A. The client is a private company owned by five shareholders, and all of them are involved in the day-to-day operations. B. The company has decreased its credit limit for new customers from $6,000 to $2,000. C. The client’s CFO left for alternative employment, and no one acted as an interim CFO in the last six months of the financial year. D. Auditors found that the purchase manager had approved 100% of purchase transactions tested. E. The auditor did not detect any material misstatements from the client’s financial reports in the past five financial years.arrow_forwardHatfield Industries is a large manufacturing conglomerate based in the United States with annual sales in excess of $300 million. Hatfield is currently under investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for accounting irregularities and possible legal violations in the presentation of the company’s financial statements. A due diligence team from the SEC has been sent to Hatfield’s corporate headquarters in Philadelphia for a complete audit in order to further assess the situation.Several unique circumstances at Hatfield are discovered by the SEC due diligence team during the course of the investigation:∙ Management has been involved in ongoing negotiations with the local labor union, of which approximately 40% of its full-time labor force are members. Labor officials are seeking increased wages and pension benefits, which Hatfield’s management states is not possible at this time due to decreased profitability and a tight cash flow situation. Labor officials have…arrow_forward
- Hatfield Industries is a large manufacturing conglomerate based in the United States with annual sales in excess of $300 million. Hatfield is currently under investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for accounting irregularities and possible legal violations in the presentation of the company’s financial statements. A due diligence team from the SEC has been sent to Hatfield’s corporate headquarters in Philadelphia for a complete audit in order to further assess the situation.Several unique circumstances at Hatfield are discovered by the SEC due diligence team during the course of the investigation:∙ Management has been involved in ongoing negotiations with the local labor union, of which approximately 40% of its full-time labor force are members. Labor officials are seeking increased wages and pension benefits, which Hatfield’s management states is not possible at this time due to decreased profitability and a tight cash flow situation. Labor officials have…arrow_forwardHatfield Industries is a large manufacturing conglomerate based in the United States with annual sales in excess of $300 million. Hatfield is currently under investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for accounting irregularities and possible legal violations in the presentation of the company’s financial statements. A due diligence team from the SEC has been sent to Hatfield’s corporate headquarters in Philadelphia for a complete audit in order to further assess the situation.Several unique circumstances at Hatfield are discovered by the SEC due diligence team during the course of the investigation:∙ Management has been involved in ongoing negotiations with the local labor union, of which approximately 40% of its full-time labor force are members. Labor officials are seeking increased wages and pension benefits, which Hatfield’s management states is not possible at this time due to decreased profitability and a tight cash flow situation. Labor officials have…arrow_forwardaccountant reviews the report from the internal audit function that ensures the company's internal controls and risk management policies are functioning properly. According to report, there were discrepancies in the internal controls that are not in conformance with the organizational policy and applicable law. The accountant suspects that the CEO is pezzling approximately $30,000 per quarter. What should the accountant do about this discrepancy? te accountant fails to act on this issue, what standard according to the IMA Statement of Ethical Professifal Practice does the accountant violate? the toolbar, press ALT + F10 (PC) or ALT + FN + F10 (Mac).arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
